Following the announcement of the 2023/24 #CarsAwards winners, Cars.co.za rocked Sandton City with a 3-day Consumer Awards Roadshow that brought the 39 finalists directly to the South African public with Absa facilitating finance and insurance solutions on the spot!
The 7th iteration of the Cars.co.za Consumer Awards sponsored by Absa and endorsed by Naamsa (The Automotive Business Council) was a resounding success!
The glitzy gala event took place on the Sandton City rooftop on Thursday, 29 February 2024 where industry leaders, OEM’s, dealer partners and media representatives enjoyed the #CarsAwards category winner announcements hosted by South African comedian, Nik Rabinowitz and Radio and TV personality, Khutso Theledi.
Consumer Awards Roadshow with Absa brings SA’s best cars to the people
For the entire weekend from 1-3 March 2024, and for the first time in the history of #CarsAwards, Cars.co.za together with Absa, painted Sandton City red with an industry-first Consumer Awards Roadshow that saw all 39 finalists on display, allowing consumers to engage with the best cars in South Africa. Cars.co.za also hosted a similar event at the Mall of Africa late in 2023.
In partnership with Absa, South Africa’s leading Financial Services Provider (FSP), consumers requiring car finance and car insurance were assisted quickly and efficiently on the spot, providing an instantaneous car purchasing solution.
But that’s not all, the public also had the unique opportunity to gain buying advice directly from #CarsAwards judges including Ciro De Siena, Jacob Moshokoa, Juliet McGuire, David Taylor, Gero Lilleike, Muzi Sambo, Kumbi Mtshakazi, MrHowMuch, Rebaneilwe Semakane and Mpho Mahlangu.
Hannes Oosthuizen, Consumer Experience Manager at Cars.co.za, commented, “Following the successful Mall of Africa activation last year, we were confident that a more focused approach to the Sandton City Consumer Roadshow, in partnership with Absa, would allow us to bring consumers even closer to the point of buying.”
“It was interesting to observe consumer behaviour, with hundreds of consumers jumping from one car to the next, seriously considering their next purchase. I think the opportunity to directly compare rival vehicles right there-and-then was key to the appeal, and with Absa there to answer any finance-related questions, consumers walked away fully armed with all the information they needed to make a decision”, said Oosthuizen.
Visitors to the Consumer Roadshow were also encouraged to register for Absa’s competition which will see one lucky person win R500 000 towards any car of their choice! The winner will feature in a Cars.co.za YouTube video with Ciro De Siena assisting with making the car purchasing decision at one of our dealer partners. The competition winner will be announced in March 2024.
It was a busy weekend and shoppers enjoyed seeing and touching the cars on display.
Cars.co.za Journalist and #CarsAwards judge, Gero Lilleike, had this to say, “Sandton City was buzzing! Where else in South Africa can you examine 39 of the best cars on sale all in one place? For anyone looking to buy a car, the Consumer Roadshow was a fantastic opportunity for buyers to get professional car-buying advice and finance on-the-go.”
“Cars.co.za has positioned itself as a consumer champion and with Absa, our judges and test team present to offer advice, the Consumer Roadshow was a one-stop solution for anyone interested in purchasing a car and it was amazing to see the public making the most of this unique opportunity”
Hyundai SA working to keep i30 N hot hatch alive locally
It’s not over yet! While the i30 N has indeed been axed in Europe, Hyundai Automotive South Africa says it’s working to keep the hot hatch on sale locally…
Reports suggesting the Hyundai i30 N has been discontinued in South Africa may turn out to be a mite premature. Yes, Hyundai Automotive South Africa has confirmed to Cars.co.za that it’s working to keep the hot hatch on sale locally.
Towards the end of February 2024, Hyundai Motor Europe released a statement confirming that production of both the i20 N (which isn’t offered here in SA) and i30 N for Europehad ceased, explaining that the N division would instead turn its attention – on that continent, at least – to high-performance electric vehicles (EVs).
However, the company’s Australian division soon thereafter told CarExpert that its market is “not affected by the recent European market announcement” (with the publication furthermore suggesting another facelift is on the cards). So, we asked Hyundai Automotive SA whether the i30 N would likewise continue to be offered here in South Africa.
Though Hyundai Automotive SA told us its bid to keep the i30 N alive in Mzansi is “not yet a definite yes”, it confirmed it’s currently following the process required to keep importing the Czech-built hot hatch. Of course, time will tell whether its efforts prove successful.
There’s certainly something to be said for having a high-performance model in the line-up, even if the i30 N is by no means a volume driver for the South Korean automaker’s local division. In 2023, for instance, Hyundai registered 60 units of the i30 N in South Africa, followed by 6 units in January 2024 and 7 examples in February 2024.
As a reminder, the i30 N launched in South Africa in February 2020, with its turbocharged 2.0-litre, 4-cylinder engine sending 202 kW and 353 Nm to the front axle via a 6-speed manual gearbox. Hyundai’s local distributor then switched to a refreshed version in April 2022, ditching the pre-facelift model’s manual cog-swapper in favour of an 8-speed dual-clutch transmission.
The updated i30 N’s motor delivers improved outputs of 206 kW and 392 Nm through the aforementioned dual-clutch cog-swapper, facilitating a claimed 0-100 kph time of 5.4 seconds. Topping out at 250 kph, Hyundai’s hot hatch is currently priced at R848 900 (March 2024).
Interestingly, in September 2023, Hyundai Automotive SA confirmed to Cars.co.za that production of the closely related Kona N had ended, though added there was “more than enough stock” in Mzansi – considering this flagship derivative’s “niche” standing – to satisfy local demand for some time. At the time of writing, the Kona N was also still listed on the company’s local website.
VW Polo for farmers? New ‘Robust’ hatch revealed overseas
Meet the Volkswagen Polo Robust, a fresh version of the popular hatchback aimed directly at farmers but seemingly exclusive to Brazil…
If we say “farmer’s vehicle”, your mind will probably immediately conjure up an image of some or other tried-and-tested workhorse bakkie (perhaps a Toyota Hilux or Isuzu D-Max). But Volkswagen in Brazil has other ideas, having just launched a new Polo derivative called the “Robust” – and pitched it directly at farmers.
Yes, the German firm’s Brazilian arm has revealed the new farmer-spec Polo Robust, saying it was “developed and tested with customers in the agricultural segment”.
What sets this newcomer apart from the standard version of the hatchback? Well, the Polo Robust – the latter badge has also been used on the Saveiro half-tonne bakkie in that market – comes with raised front and rear suspension (the company hasn’t yet provided a specific ground-clearance figure), and is furthermore fitted with a pair of special accessory kits.
The first of these, which VW Brazil says is focused on the “protection and conservation of the vehicle”, includes vinyl seat covers, rubber floor mats and “grille protectors” up front. The second accessory kit adds a rubber mat in the luggage compartment as well as a tow bar.
Like the Polo GTS we covered early in 2023, the Polo Robust features an older taillamp design still used in some South American markets, rather than the latest rear-end styling employed by the Kariega-built Polo hatch we know here in Mzansi. In addition, it appears to ride on steel wheels (though the latter at least bear plastic covers), while a “Robust” badge has been added to the tailgate.
From what we can gather, the Polo Robust is based on the Polo Track – a budget version of the hatchback launched in Brazil in late 2022 as a replacement for the long-running Gol – and is thus likely powered the same 1.0-litre MPI engine. That naturally aspirated motor has peak outputs of 62 kW and 100 Nm, and drives the front axle via a 5-speed manual gearbox.
Will we see the Polo Robust in Mzansi? We’d speculate that such a launch seems extremely unlikely, despite the fact Volkswagen SA did once offer a hatchback-based light-commercial vehicle in the form of the locally developed Polo Vivo Xpress.
Instead, we’d say VW’s local division will push ahead with its plans to create a new half-tonne bakkie based on the upcoming mystery 3rd product pencilled in for Kariega production…
What To Buy: Honda Elevate vs Toyota Urban Cruiser vs Chery Tiggo 4 Pro
The Honda Elevate recently arrived in South Africa and it appears to be getting some positive reviews from the local press, but how does it stack up against Toyota’s segment stalwart the Urban Cruiser and the top-selling Chery Tiggo 4 Pro?
Honda, however, has introduced its new Elevate to the South African market where it has replaced the outgoing WR-V in the Japanese firm’s local line-up. Honda has been struggling to compete against newer products from rival brands, but along with a growing consumer appetite for affordable and well-specced compact SUVs, Honda is hoping that the new Elevate will find favour with local buyers.
How then does the new Honda Elevate compare against segment top-seller, the Chery Tiggo Pro 4 and the tried-and-trusted Toyota Urban Cruiser?
The main aim of this article is to help you, the consumer, make an informed buying decision. To help you do this, we will provide you with the need-to-know information and insight based on available vehicle information and our experience with the cars in question.
This article will cover key aspects including Exterior Styling, Performance & Efficiency, Interior Execution and Features, Dimensions & Practicality, as well as Pricing & Warranty details.
If, at the end of this article, you are still undecided as to what to buy, you are more than welcome to reach out to us for advice via X, Facebook or Instagram. Our experienced test team will gladly assist you.
What To Buy: Honda Elevate vs Toyota Urban Cruiser vs Chery Tiggo 4 Pro
Exterior Styling
Honda Elevate
The Elevate comes to market with an overtly boxy look and stout stance. It features a large, upright grille, contoured bonnet, plus LED headlights (with daytime running lights) and -taillights. The newcomer gains some ruggedness thanks to the plastic cladding around the squared-off wheel arches and skirting.
The base Elevate 1.5 Comfort rides on 16-inch steel wheels (clad with wheel covers), while the range-topping 1.5 Elegance derivative rides on 17-inch alloy wheels as standard.
Toyota Urban Cruiser
The Toyota Urban Cruiser adopts a sleek front-end design with a split grille design with an upper and lower section. Chrome trim adds a degree of sophistication to the design and the slim double Daytime Running Light (DRL) strips give the Urban Cruiser a unique look. The projector headlight units are positioned below the DRLs and are finished with chrome garnish.
The base 1.5 XS derivatives ride on 17-inch steel wheels (clad with turbine-inspired wheel covers), while the range-topping 1.5 XR derivative gains black-lattice 17-inch alloy wheels.
Chery Tiggo Pro 4
The Chery Tiggo 4 Pro perhaps adopts the boldest front-end design with a large studded grille and, on the 1.5T Elite, LED headlamps with DRLs. The Tiggo 4 Pro, in line with the segment trend, also features rugged all-around plastic cladding. The Tiggo 4 Pro is offered with 16-inch alloy wheels in LiT, Urban and Comfort trim, while the range-topping Elite derivative rides on 17-inch alloy wheels as standard.
All 3 of these cars offer attractive styling in their own right and as styling is subjective/a matter of taste, you will have to decide for yourself which one you like the most. Let us know which look you prefer!
The Honda Elevate offers good overall performance and is claimed to have frugal fuel consumption. The Elevate accelerates comfortably to highway speeds and its continuously variable automatic transmission CVT (with steering-mounted “shift paddles”) is one of the better units available in this segment.
Because the Honda has a naturally aspirated engine, buyers should expect a performance reduction of around 15% at altitude (Gauteng), which will be most apparent when the vehicle is fully loaded with luggage and occupants. This characteristic will also apply to its non-turbocharged Urban Cruiser rival.
In terms of efficiency, the Elevate returned a fuel consumption figure of below 7 L/100 km when we drove it, which in our opinion, makes the Elevate more fuel-efficient than the Urban Cruiser and Tiggo 4 Pro.
NVH (noise, vibration and harshness) is well suppressed from entering the cabin and the Elevate delivers a very forgiving ride quality, while exhibiting minimal body roll while cornering.
Overall, the Elevate’s performance doesn’t disappoint.
As an urban runabout, the Urban Cruiser (the cousin of the 2023/24 #CarsAwards category winner, the Suzuki Grand Vitara) is difficult to fault. Even though its outputs are comparatively lower than those of the Honda, the Toyota’s performance is adequate (average) for general use. Like the Elevate, the Urban Cruiser’s performance will wane at altitude, so buyers will have to factor this into their buying decision.
When we reviewed the Urban Cruiser for a comparison with the Grand Vitara, it consumed more than 7.5 L/100 km in manual guise (the automatic version was thirstier still). However, its ride quality is admirable, courtesy of a comfort-oriented suspension setup and refinement benefits from good NVH suppression.
Top-spec derivatives of the Tiggo 4 Pro are powered by a turbopetrol engine that delivers comparatively higher outputs, so they will perform better at altitude and deliver more urgent acceleration when needed.
The Tiggo 4 Pro’s ride quality is average – while fairly comfortable on smooth roads, a lack of sufficient damping does become evident on poor surfaces where the jolts and vibrations can be felt in the cabin.
And whereas the Chery offers perkier performance, that does come at the expense of fuel efficiency. When we tested a 1.5T, it returned figures above 8.5 L/100 km – not ideal for a model in this segment.
With the above in mind, the Honda Elevate appears to deliver a better balance between performance and economy than its rivals. Let’s see how it fares in terms of interior execution!
For this comparison, we will highlight the standard features for the range-topping derivatives in each of the respective model ranges. See the full comparison here!
Honda Elevate 1.5 Elegance
Toyota Urban Cruiser 1.5 XR
Chery Tiggo 4 Pro 1.5T Elite
Infotainment system
8-inch touchscreen
7-inch touchscreen
10.25-inch touchscreen
Digital Instrument Cluster
7-inch TFT display
Analogue dials
7-inch digital cluster
Android Auto / Apple CarPlay
Yes, both
Yes, both (wireless)
Yes, both
Bluetooth, Voice Control, USB,
Yes to all, 2 x front USB ports
Yes, but no voice control, 1 x front USB port
Yes to all, 2 x front + 1 x rear USB
Wireless Charging
Yes
No
No
Rear View Camera
Yes
Yes
Yes, 360-degree surround view
Steering Adjustment: Rake / Reach
Yes, both
Yes, both
Yes, both
Cruise Control
No
Yes
Yes, adaptive
Air Conditioning
Yes, automatic climate control
Yes, automatic climate control
Yes, automatic dual-zone climate control
Panoramic Sunroof
Yes
No
Yes
Upholstery / electric seats
Artificial leather, manual seat adjustment
Fabric, manual adjustment
Artificial leather, manual adjustment
Front / Rear Park Distance Control
Rear only
Rear only
Rear only
Honda Elevate
The Elevate’s cabin adopts an uncomplicated design approach, which is to say it’s neat and classy, but lacks a bit of flair. A mix of both hard-wearing plastics and soft-touch materials are used throughout the cabin and the perceived build quality is indeed very good. The tactile quality of the switchgear is also impressive. Honda is known for solid build quality and the Elevate lives up to that expectation.
As far as standard features are concerned, the Elevate 1.5 Elegance derivative comes well-specified, but it would have been near-perfectly equipped if it had a cruise control function. Cruise control is an odd omission, because it would be very handy on longer trips. Wireless smartphone charging, however, is a welcome feature. The safety specification is fairly comprehensive too, with a total of 6 airbags fitted.
Toyota Urban Cruiser
Like the Elevate, the Urban Cruiser adopts a basic, but functional cabin design with good ergonomics. The Urban Cruiser’s infotainment touchscreen is mounted vertically on top of the dashboard and also features a mix of hard and soft materials with good general build quality.
Even if it features fabric instead of faux leather upholstery, the top-spec 1.5 XR is reasonably equipped, but nice-to-have features, such as wireless charging and a sunroof are, however, not available.
Chery Tiggo 4 Pro
When it comes to overall feature value, the Tiggo 4 Pro is tough to beat in 1.5T Elite trim. Unlike the Elevate and Urban Cruiser, the Tiggo Pro 4’s cabin adopts an upmarket, fashion-forward design with plush, stitched leather surfaces, a larger infotainment screen and a digital instrument cluster.
The Chery’s standard feature list is also mightily impressive when compared to those of its Japanese rivals. Features such as adaptive cruise control, a 360-degree camera and additional safety features are typically found on more expensive models. Perceived build quality is also good.
Chery’s strong standard feature value is one of the reasons why the Tiggo 4 Pro is currently the best-selling compact family car in South Africa…
Dimensions & Practicality
Honda Elevate
Toyota Urban Cruiser
Chery Tiggo 4 Pro
Length
4 312 mm
4 365 mm
4 318 mm
Width
1 790 mm
1 795 mm
1 831 mm
Height
1 650 mm
1 635 mm
1 662 mm
Wheelbase
2 650 mm
2 600 mm
2 610 mm
Kerb Weight
1 259 kg
1 165 kg
1 364 kg
Ground Clearance
199 mm
210 mm
180 mm
Load Capacity
458 L
353 L
340 to 1 100 L
Summary
While these 3 models are similarly sized, the Honda Elevate stands out with its longer wheelbase, which ultimately translates into more legroom for rear passengers as well as luggage space. With its rear seatback Note that the Elevate also offers significantly more luggage space than its rivals at 458 litres.
It’s also worth pointing out that the Urban Cruiser has the most generous ground clearance which is useful for traversing over gravel surfaces while the Tiggo 4 Pro offers only 180 mm which will limit its ability to tackle trickier unsealed surfaces.
What To Buy: Is the Honda Elevate worth a closer look?
The Honda Elevate offers a strong combination of performance and economy, standard features, as well as practicality, but its buying proposition is eroded due to its premium over its Japanese and Chinese rivals. At the time of writing (March 2024), the top-of-the-range 1.5 Elegance CVT (automatic) derivative cost R47k and R43k more than its Urban Cruiser 1.5 XR auto and Tiggo 4 Pro 1.5 Elite rivals respectively.
Nonetheless, the well-made, if slightly conservative, newcomer makes a compelling case for itself, at the very least prospective buyers should be encouraged to book a test drive at their local Honda dealer.
Buyers in this segment are price-sensitive and seek value for money. Chinese brands such as Chery and Haval are gaining significant market share simply by offering well-specified cars at hugely competitive prices that rival brands aren’t able to match. To illustrate our point, even the lavishly-equipped 1.5T Elite SE Tiggo 4 Pro flagship (R408 900, in March 2023) is more affordable than the top-specced Elevate.
Legacy brands with a proven track record of reliability, however, still command strong demand and products such as the Toyota Urban Cruiser and Suzuki Grand Vitara are likely to continue to sell strongly.
As always, we advise buyers to do their research on Cars.co.za and reach out to us if you require any further information or advice.
Whereas the Ford Ranger double-cab is an off-road-capable family vehicle with limited workhorse capability, its SuperCab variant offers a different skill set. It may only seat 2 occupants, but as a light commercial vehicle, it’s far more practical than a single cab.
We like: Excellent infotainment system, clever storage behind the seats, modern looks, punchy powertrain and excellent off-road capability.
We don’t like: has a very specific target market, transmission can hesitate, jittery ride when unladen
In the land of the bakkie (ute, pickup or truck, if you’re reading this outside South Africa), the double-cab (DC) is king. What’s not to like? DCs offer seating for at least 4 occupants, a variety of passenger-car features, a reasonably sized load tub and 4×4 versions even have good off-road ability. The single cab, in turn, is often utilised as a workhorse for businesses such as plumbers, electricians and other service providers; accessories and assorted paraphernalia are usually stored under roller shutters or in canopies.
And, whereas a single cab lacks versatility due to its limited in-cab passenger capacity, the double-cab’s biggest drawback (as a family car) is its lack of secure storage space. That’s because if you need full use of the load tub, there’s only so much oddment storage space in the cab. And face it, leaving your laptop bag on one of the seats is not a smart idea, given the prevalence of opportunistic crime in South Africa.
Enter the SuperCab, which is Ford’s extended cab variant of its Ranger bakkie. Essentially, it’s a single-cab bakkie that offers additional versatility by having generous storage capacity (located behind the seats). Tested here is the flagship Wildtrak derivative, which this author nicknamed the “Ranger coupe”.
There has been much discussion about the P703-gen Ranger’s looks since the bakkie debuted in late 2022, but our test team remains enthralled by the model’s macho and muscular exterior design. It looks most impressive clad in the bold Cyber Orange finish, but that is admittedly not to everyone’s taste. Still, our test unit’s Frozen White paintwork contrasted nicely with its dark grey 18-inch alloy wheels…
As a reminder, this generation of Ranger has a 50-mm longer wheelbase than its predecessor, which means it incorporates improved packaging and offers more practicality than before. Going the SuperCab route adds a pair of rear-hinged doors that allow easier access to the extra space behind the front seats.
There are 2 neat storage bins: the one contains the vehicle’s jack and warning triangle, while the other is ready for your valuables. This author, for example, stored his camera gear and fishing tackle in the latter.
Even if you don’t use those bins, the area directly above them can hold quite a lot of incidental luggage too (it’s a perfect space to stack shopping- or work bags). Our fear of falling victim to a smash-and-grab incident was greatly reduced because the rear doors have tinted windows – there’s no way to see inside.
The 2.0 BiTurbo SuperCab Wildtrak 4×4 comes with a plastic-lined load tub fitted with clever C-clamp mounting points, an integrated ruler and a 400W inverter (with 12V and 240V plug points). If you’d like to secure larger cargo, Ford offers its Cargo Management System, which comprises an internal rail with spring-loaded, adjustable cleats on either side of theload tub,for an additional R2 910 (March 2024).
Our test unit came accessorised with a neat roller door that hid the load tub’s contents from prying eyes.
Performance and Efficiency
The flagship variant of the Ranger SuperCab needs a muscular engine to match its bold image but, even though this body style is unavailable with a brawny V6 (that motor is reserved for the headlining double-cab derivatives), the 2.0-litre 4-cylinder bi-turbodiesel engine is more than up to the task. With outputs of 154 kW and 500 Nm, the test unit dashed from 0 to 100 kph in 9.58 sec (according to our Dragy app).
The 2.0 BiTurbo SuperCab Wildtrak 4×4 has a 10-speed automatic transmission that drives the rear wheels by default. If you turn the dial on the centre tunnel to 4H, you activate 4-wheel-drive and when off-road conditions get truly challenging, you can call on 4L (low range) and even a diff-lock. To engage the latter, you must select its function in the touchscreen menu (the same goes for hill descent control).
During the test, the auto ‘box tended to shift tardily around town at lower speeds (it seemed to hesitate) and some downshifts weren’t smooth, but the ‘changes improved markedly at freeway/cruising speeds.
As for the bakkie’s performance in cut-and-thrust driving conditions, it showed no shortage of grunt on the open road. Those 500 Newtons (from 1 750 rpm) came in very handy when overtaking slower traffic.
There are various drive modes, including Eco, which adjusts the powertrain to optimise fuel economy. With its 80-litre fuel tank, the 2.0 BiTurbo Wildtrak 4×4 has an estimated range of just over 1 000 km, but during its tenure in our test fleet, the SuperCab proved thirstier than expected. It indicated an average fuel consumption of 10.1 L/100 km, which was notably higher than its claimed figure (7.5 L/100 km).
Ride and Handling
While there’s not much of a kerb weight difference between this derivative and its double-cab equivalent (2 285 kg vs 2 334 kg), the SuperCab’s handling felt a little shaper (or less lumbering) by comparison, but the laws of physics still apply… This is a ladder-frame-based bakkie; it’s no corner-carving machine!
Our test unit came with its 18-inch alloy wheels wrapped in 255/65 all-terrain tyres (R2 180 to specify those), but Ford also offers eye-catching 20-inch aluminium wheels (R7 600) if you want maximum visual impact, even at the expense of some all-terrain ability (you wouldn’t want to damage those rims).
If off-roading is your passion, opt for the former. The plumper tyre offers a softer ride quality and despite it being a 4×4 tyre, road noise was minimal, which speaks volumes for the cabin’s noise suppression.
Like virtually all body-on-frame vehicles, the SuperCab’s ride quality is inconsistent. First, the bad news: when its load tub is unladen, the SuperCab rides nervously when it traverses bumps or dips in the road. When travelling on a poorly maintained road, such as one that’s been wrinkled by tree roots underneath it, the Ranger’s suspension feels unsettled, but that remark isn’t meant as an indictment of this particular model – to reiterate, most double-cab bakkie are afflicted by that characteristic to some degree.
The good news is that in terms of overall road manners, the Ranger offers the most resolved, reasonably pliant ride quality in its class. When cruising on the open road, it absorbs road imperfections adroitly.
Of course, the compromise that a body-on-frame setup demands in terms of on-road refinement is made up for by added strength, rigidity and 4×4 capability when negotiating an off-road route or course.
What’s more, the Ranger has an arsenal of off-road drive modes, a low-range transfer case, 237 mm ground clearance, as well as an impressive 800-mm wading ability. We have considerable experience testing derivatives of the current Ranger model in off-road conditions, such as during the test days of the 2023/24 CarsAwards programme at the Gerotek last year; we remain impressed with its 4×4-ing talents.
Comfort and Features
When you climb inside the SuperCab, the bakkie instantly delivers a class-leading in-car experience; most other bakkies’ cabins feel ancient in comparison to the Ranger’s state-of-the-art cockpit. The headline act is, of course, that portrait-orientated infotainment screen powered by Sync4A software.
Not only does it boast impressive resolution, but its voice control functionality is some of the best, and the integration with Apple CarPlay and Android Auto is pretty slick. We also appreciated the smartly finished multifunction ‘wheel and the digital instrument cluster – they befit a flagship Ranger offering.
There’s a sporty theme to the leather-trimmed cabin, which stands out for its durable – yet nonetheless upmarket-feeling – build quality. The Wildtrak designation is stitched into the seats and you cannot miss the orange stitching on the steering wheel rim, seat edges and the transmission lever knob and -boot.
We’re also big fans of Ford’s focus on practicality and an intuitive user experience. The wireless charging pad, for example, is positioned neatly away from prying eyes (ahead of the transmission tunnel, beneath the fascia), while USB-A and USB-C charging ports are also conveniently positioned. The door handles are neatly integrated into the armrests and, you can open a door with one smooth motion of the hand.
At this price level, buyers will expect the Ranger to be fitted with numerous semi-autonomous safety features and it is: emergency automatic braking, lane-keeping assist and adaptive cruise control are standard and a 360-degree camera system makes parking manoeuvres in tight spaces much easier.
What’s more, 7 airbags (front-, side-, curtain and driver knee ‘bags), ABS, dynamic stability- and trailer- sway control are fitted; for the record, the Ranger scored 5 stars in the 2022 Euro NCAP safety test.
Ford Ranger SuperCab price and After-sales support
Ford offers the Ranger SuperCab in manual and automatic, 4×2 and 4×4 and numerous trim levels. The range’s prices start from R504 900 and go up to R788 300 for the 2.0 BiTurbo SuperCab Wildtrak 4×4.
The SuperCab ships with a 4-year/120 000 km warranty, 4-year/unlimited km roadside assistance and a 5-year/unlimited km corrosion warranty. The recommended service interval is every 15 000 km/annually, whichever occurs first, but note that, unlike its rivals, the Ford doesn’t come with a standard service plan.
Instead, Ford Ranger SuperCab customers can purchase service- or maintenance plans that are valid for up to 8 years or 165 000 km. The warranty can be extended to (up to) 7 years or 200 000 km.
Verdict
We thoroughly enjoyed our time with the SuperCab variant of the Ford Ranger. While most prospective buyers will aspire to buy the top-of-line double-cab derivatives, those bakkies are not within everyone’s purchasing power. However, the SuperCab Wildtrak is over R135k cheaper than its double-cab sibling.
Also, unlike a double cab, if the SuperCab is procured to serve a VAT-registered small business, for example, that company can claim back the value-added tax in the bakkie’s purchase price AND deduct at least a part (if not all) of the vehicle’s depreciation against income tax over a period (such as 3 years).
Beyond being a more user-friendly source of daily transport than a single-cab light commercial vehicle – the SuperCab Wildtrak comes equipped with the luxury appointments of a desirable lifestyle vehicle.
Should you buy one? If your budget can’t stretch to a new double-cab and you don’t have offspring to cart around, a Ranger SuperCab does make a lot of sense. Apart from its clever storage system behind the seats (where there’s more space than you’d expect), the Ford is a highly accomplished offering.
Farewell, Mazda BT-50! Bakkie discontinued in South Africa
The Mazda BT-50 bakkie has been officially discontinued in South Africa, bringing an end to the nameplate’s 18-year run in the country…
Yes, it’s the end of an era. The Mazda BT-50 been officially discontinued in South Africa, ending the nameplate’s 18-year run (and even longer B-Series heritage) in the country.
We noticed the bakkie was no longer listed on the Japanese firm’s local website and asked the company for comment on the BT-50’s local fate. Our suspicions were unfortunately correct: the Isuzu-built model was indeed axed at the start of March 2024.
For the record, the bakkie was also recently discontinued in New Zealand, another right-hand-drive market, though Mazda says it “will continue to manufacture the BT-50 as part of its alliance with Isuzu for other global markets”.
Why has the axe fallen on the BT-50? Well, Mazda Southern Africa says the current version “has not made inroads into our extremely competitive double-cab market, especially in comparison to brands that manufacture locally”, making reference to the likes of the Toyota Hilux, Ford Ranger and Isuzu D-Max.
“The South African LCV [light-commercial vehicle], and in particular the double-cab market, is extremely well developed and competitive, with locally manufactured brands and nameplates dominating sales. This factor, as well as an extremely challenging landscape for imported vehicles, competing directly with locally manufactured products, has led Mazda SA to make this difficult decision,” said Craig Roberts, Managing Director of Mazda SA.
As a reminder, the BT-50 range had comprised 4 double-cab derivatives, last priced from R630 400 and running through to R818 400. The line-up kicked off with a pair of 4×2 Active variants using a 1.9-litre, 4-cylinder turbodiesel engine (110 kW and 350 Nm), and available in either 6-speed manual or 6-speed automatic guise. There was also a 3.0-litre, 4-cylinder turbodiesel engine (producing 140 kW and 450 Nm), offered in either 4×2 Dynamic or 4×4 Individual form but exclusively with a 6-speed self-shifting transmission in either case.
The current-generation, SA-spec Mazda BT-50 was imported from Thailand, where it was produced by Isuzu (and based on the latest-generation D-Max). Though this TF-series BT-50 was revealed in mid-2020, it touched down in Mzansi only in July 2021.
During its time on the local market, this latest BT-50 wasn’t terribly well received. In 2023, for instance, it was South Africa’s slowest-selling traditional bakkie, with 69 units registered across the entire year (that’s a monthly average of fewer than 6 units). Interestingly, sales improved to 15 units apiece in January and February 2024, though perhaps dealers were offering promotions in order to move the last of the stock.
The original BT-50 was revealed back in 2006, based on the Ford Ranger and built at the Blue Oval brand’s Silverton facility right here in South Africa. The 2nd-generation version debuted in Mzansi in 2012, initially again produced locally by Ford, before Mazda SA switched to a Thai-built version at the facelift in 2017.
Mazda says “current inventory at dealers will be the final available BT-50 vehicles for retail sale in SA, confirming “no further imports of the BT-50” will be made. Existing BT-50 owners, though, needn’t worry since current and previous generations “will continue to be supported by Mazda SA and its 42 dealers around the country”.
“As with the runout of any specific model, Mazda SA will continue to support BT-50 with all service, repair and replacement parts,” the Japanese company’s local arm concluded.
10 interesting facts from SA’s February 2024 new-vehicle sales
We’ve combed through South Africa’s new-vehicle sales figures for February 2024 and pulled out 10 interesting facts. Here are your bite-sized new-vehicle nuggets…
February 2024 was another fascinating month for South Africa’s new-vehicle market. Overall, it was the industry’s 7th consecutive month of year-on-year decline, with total registrations falling 0.9% to 44 749 units. But dig a little deeper into the sales statistics and there are plenty of interesting facts to be found.
Yes, while we’ve already covered the big news – such as the fact Suzuki Auto SA cut the gap to the 2nd-placed Volkswagen Group to a mere 112 sales, while the Toyota Hilux continued its domination of the bakkie space – it’s now time to unearth a few fascinating nuggets. Let’s dive right in…
1. GWM sold 8 units of its Ora electric car
With a starting price of R686 950, the GWM Ora – which launched locally in November 2023 – is currently positioned as South Africa’s least-expensive full-sized electric vehicle (EV). In February 2024, the Chinese firm’s local division sold 8 units (7 through the dealer channel and a single example registered to the company itself). As a reminder, EVs accounted for 931 sales in Mzansi last year.
2. New Elevate added 57 sales for Honda
Honda Motor Southern Africa surely has high hopes for the new Elevate, which has the potential to become its main driver of volume. In February 2024, the Japanese firm’s local arm registered 57 units of the new Ballade-based crossover (13 for its own use), despite the fact the market launch took place with less than a week of the month to go. Another interesting titbit: as many as 60 examples were registered in the opening month of the year, well ahead of the launch.
3. Hyundai i30 N edged Mégane RS 300 Trophy
Hyundai Automotive SA sold 7 units of the i30 N – which is set to be pulled from European markets in the near future – last month, which made the Korean automaker’s hot hatch slightly more popular than fellow C-segment screamer, the Renault Mégane RS 300 Trophy (5 units). Still, with just 55 examples of the latter set aside for South Africa, the French firm must surely be running out of stock. Bonus interesting facts? The Volkswagen Golf 8 GTI and R together managed 97 sales in February 2024, with 7 sold to government and 8 registered by VW for its own use.
4. Nissan NP200’s sales spike before demise
Yes, production of the Nissan NP200 is scheduled to end at Rosslyn this month (March 2024). Since there’s no half-tonne bakkie alternative on the local market, sales of the NP200 spiked in February, with the 16-year-old contender climbing back into 4 figures for the first time since November 2023, to end on 1 276 units. Fascinatingly, 4 of those were sold to government, with 260 purchased by the rental industry. Meanwhile, Nissan South Africa registered 10 units of the NP200 for its own use.
5. Ferrari SF90 outsold Honda Civic (and others)
Considering the Italian firm’s low-volume production strategy, Scuderia South Africa had a bumper month in February 2024, registering as many as 12 units. The most popular Prancing Horse in Mzansi last month was the SF90, with 5 registrations. That means the SF90 outsold the likes of the Honda Civic (3 units), Subaru WRX (3 units), Alfa Romeo Stelvio (2 units) and Audi A6 sedan (2 units) in the year’s 2nd month.
6. Government boosted Isuzu D-Max sales
The Isuzu D-Max put in a strong showing in February 2024, with its tally of 1 740 registrations proving enough for the Struandale-manufactured bakkie to jump 2 positions overall to 5th place (while retaining 3rd place on the list of South Africa’s best-selling bakkies). Intriguingly, the Japanese bakkie topped the table of vehicles sold to government last month, receiving a useful boost of 416 sales via that channel.
7. Toyota’s full-fat GR models hit 10 units
From what we understand, it’s no easy task getting your hands on a brand-new version of any of Toyota’s full-fat GR products, with only a limited number of each coming into the country every month. In February 2024, the Japanese company’s local division registered 6 units of the GR86, along with a pair of GR Supra examples and a single unit of each of the GR Yaris and GR Corolla all-paw hot hatches.
8. Grand i10’s best effort in over a year
February 2024 saw the Hyundai Grand i10 put in its best performance for more than a year, ending the month on a healthy 1 313 units (including 50 sales in the light-commercial vehicle segment) and thus grabbing 8th position overall. As many as 517 of those registrations came via sales to the rental industry, where the Grand i10 topped the charts last month. As a reminder, the range was refreshed in the 3rd quarter of 2023, gaining sedan derivatives at the same time.
9. No Alfa Romeo Giulia sales in February
Yes, Alfa Romeo failed to register a single unit of the Giulia sedan in February 2024 … having sold just one in January. Though the Veloce derivative is still up on the Italian company’s local configurator, it’s interesting to note that the vehicle-information specialists over at duoporta.com currently list only the high-performance Quadrifoglio version, suggesting the Veloce may well be on its way out. For the record, Alfa registered 6 units of the Tonale and 2 examples of the Stelvio last month.
10. VW Polo (again) led the export charts
Though the Volkswagen Polo hatchback fell from the top 10 in February 2024 (ending up in 11th with 988 registrations), the Kariega-built model was again at the very top of the export charts. Indeed, a whopping 12 715 units of the Polo hatch were shipped overseas last month, putting the B-segment hatch miles ahead in the export race. Interestingly, February also saw the 1.5-millionth vehicle (in this case, a GTI destined for a customer in the United Kingdom) built for export at Kariega rolling off the line.
Does the Volkswagen Up represent a compelling used car purchase? Let’s examine this classy little city car’s strengths and weaknesses, and find out what you can expect to pay for a good 2nd-hand example…
Though the Volkswagen Up went into production way back in 2011, the German firm’s diminutive city car touched down in South Africa only in early 2015. What was the reason for the delayed local introduction?
Well, the Wolfsburg-based firm’s division in Mzansi was understandably cautious of treading on the toes of its locally produced Polo Vivo. In fact, when the Volkswagen Up finally did make local landfall, the top-spec version was positioned a mere R3 300 below the base Vivo 5-door hatchback.
To make matters worse, the Up – which VW stylised as “up!”, dispensing with capitalisation of the initial letter and adding an entirely superfluous exclamation mark – jumped headfirst into what was an ailing A-segment, with many buyers instead turning to (larger but similarly priced) sub-B-segment options such as the Toyota Etios, Ford Figo, Renault Sandero and indeed Volkswagen’s very own Polo Vivo.
During its 5-year lifecycle in South Africa – and its 12-year global production run at the VW Group’s Bratislava factory in Slovakia, ending in 2023 – the boutique city car was available in both 3- and 5-door body styles. Interestingly, the Volkswagen Up won the World Car of the Year title in 2012, beating fellow top-3 finalists the F30-generation BMW 3 Series and the 991-series Porsche 911 to the award.
Volkswagen Up model line-up in South Africa
Previewed by a 2007 concept, the production version of the Volkswagen Up was unveiled in August 2011, just ahead of the Frankfurt Motor Show. It’s thought this lengthy gestation period was thanks to the Wolfsburg-based manufacturer’s decision to switch from the show car’s rear-engine configuration to a conventional (not to mention more economical-to-build) front-engine layout.
After much deliberation from VWSA, seemingly owing to concerns of a potential overlap with the Polo Vivo, the Up officially arrived in Mzansi in February 2015 (though, likely in a bid to minimise any such sales cannibalisation, the city car was initially offered exclusively in 3-door form). At launch, buyers had the choice of 2 trim levels, but just a single engine-and-gearbox combination was available:
1.0 MPI Take Up 5MT 3-Door (55 kW/95 Nm)
1.0 MPI Move Up 5MT 3-Door (55 kW/95 Nm)
The local line-up gained the option of a special-edition Club package in August 2015. Available for Move derivatives finished in Pure White, Blueberry or Dark Silver exterior paint, the kit added items such as 15-inch “Ravenna” alloy wheels, leather trim for the steering wheel, a painted dashboard panel, silver-hued side-mirror caps, tartan cloth upholstery and plenty of “Club” branding.
In May 2016, by which time around 3 500 examples of the 3-door variant had been sold in South Africa, VW decided to introduce the 5-door body style. Like its 3-door sibling, the 5-door Up was offered in Take and Move trim levels, though Volkswagen further expanded the range with the addition of Colour and Cross derivatives at this point.
The Colour Up – offered in either Dark Silver or Pure White – was billed as the flagship variant; it rode on 17-inch “Polygon” alloy wheels (finished in either Fortana Red or Sandstorm Yellow) and was fitted with side-mirror caps painted the same hue. The Colour specification further included tinted windows, a stripe down each flank and yet more vibrant tones inside.
Meanwhile, the Cross Up brought the usual array of SUV-inspired styling cues, including black plastic body cladding, anodised silver roof rails, branded scuff plates and 18 mm of extra ride height (taking ground clearance to 162 mm). In addition, the Cross version’s side-mirror caps were painted silver, while it sported model-specific 16-inch rims and chrome-effect bezels for its front fog lamps. Inside, there was a leather-trimmed tiller, special seat fabric (offered in red or grey) and a dash pad finished in Deep Black Pearl (or, optionally, in Tornado Red).
Then, in November 2016 – by which time about 4 800 units had been registered locally – the facelifted Up was introduced to South Africa. The exterior changes were subtle, led by revised headlamps, updated taillights, redesigned bumpers, as well as new side mirrors and fresh wheel designs. Inside, VW rolled out new materials and lengthened the list of standard features.
Interestingly, VWSA opted to cull the 3-door body style at this point, instead offering the Take and Move derivatives in 5-door form only. By the opening quarter of 2017, the updated Cross had joined the range, along with the new Beats variant. Though the latter boasted several extra features, it was defined by its uprated 300W sound system, which comprised an 8-channel amplifier, a digital signal processor, a pair of A-pillar tweeters, 2 front-door woofers, a duo of rear-sited broadband speakers and a subwoofer positioned in the spare-wheel well (the full-size spare was thus binned in favour of a mobility kit).
By around August 2020, Volkswagen’s local division had quietly stopped importing the Up, though production for many other markets continued until the final quarter of 2023. According to VWSA, as many as 12 047 units of the Up were sold locally.
What are the advantages of a VW Up?
Cabin finishes and packaging: Despite playing in the A-segment, the materials used on frequent touchpoints in the Up’s cabin were anything but “budget” (bar the steering wheel, which was initially polyurethane as standard). In fact, we’d wager the finishes were far closer in quality to “premium”, while also going as far as to say the diminutive Volkswagen was class-leading for fit and finish, besting even the impressive TA-generation Kia Picanto in this department.
Outward visibility was exceptional, while the 251-litre load bay – expandable to 951 litres in the 3-door variant and 959 litres in the 5-door (though note that Take derivatives were saddled with a single-piece folding rear bench) – was above class average.
Moreover, with a wheel pushed to each corner, the designers managed to squeeze a surprising amount of passenger space into compact exterior dimensions (the 5-door version measured just 3 600 mm long). Ingress and egress were, of course, far simpler in the case of the 5-door.
Featuring integrated headrests, the slim front seats freed up valuable knee room in the rear, while the fascia layout was ergonomically sound (though some taller drivers complained that the steering wheel obstructed their view of part of the speedometer). Note, however, that the Up was technically a 4-seater since the centre of the rear bench did without a headrest or seatbelt.
Refined, fuel-efficient engine: Though other motors (including a TSI unit) were offered in certain overseas markets, the Up was available in South Africa with just a single engine option: the atmospheric 1.0-lite 3-pot from the EA211 family. While its peak outputs of 55 kW at 6 200 rpm and 95 Nm from 3 000 rpm might appear meagre on paper, they were more than sufficient in the real world, since all derivatives weighed well under 900 kg.
Perhaps more pertinent is the fact this willing little engine was also pleasingly refined (despite the inherently unbalanced nature of 3-cylinder mills) and capable of returning wallet-friendly fuel economy, with Volkswagen claiming combined figures of 4.6 or 4.7 L/100 km, depending on the derivative.
We should point out the 1.0 MPI engine used a timing belt rather than a chain and the Volkswagen dealer we spoke to recommended that it be changed at either 8 years or 120 000 km (and further suggested the condition of the belt should be “monitored” from 90 000 km).
Ride comfort and stability: Despite employing a conventional small-car suspension arrangement comprising MacPherson struts up front and a torsion beam at the rear, the Up was endowed with the on-road stability and ride comfort of a larger, more expensive vehicle.
Most derivatives ran on high-profile tyres (for instance, the steel wheels of the base models were wrapped in particularly chunky 165/70 R14 rubber), which helped soak up road imperfections. For the record, the lowest-profile tyres offered locally were the 195/40 R17 items fitted to the Colour Up.
What are the disadvantages of a VW Up?
Spec anomalies (mostly pre-facelift): When the Up was launched in South Africa, its list of standard features seemed short of a few items. Both derivatives rode on steel wheels, while the city car initially did without any form of smartphone integration and lacked a USB port (Volkswagen did, however, offer a rudimentary aftermarket Bluetooth system via its dealers). In fact, the entry-level Take grade didn’t even feature a radio at launch, while also settling for manually adjustable side mirrors (with black rather than body-coloured housings) and window winders up front.
The Up’s infotainment shortcomings were partly remedied at the facelift, when the Take derivative gained an audio system run through a 3.1-inch monochrome display (but still sans Bluetooth and USB), with other variants upgrading to a 5-inch colour display. Volkswagen also offered a “Maps + More” dock for more comprehensive smartphone connectivity, though this was optional on all versions bar the Beats.
While ABS, 4 airbags, ISOfix child-seat anchors, remote central locking and an electronic immobiliser were standard across the range from launch, the Up made do with drum brakes at the rear and gained electronic stability control only at the facelift (along with an indirect tyre-pressure monitoring system).
Lack of auto gearbox option: In South Africa, the VW Up was available only in 5-speed manual guise, with no option of an automatic transmission. Those who required a 2-pedal vehicle thus had to look elsewhere in the segment. An automated manual gearbox was offered in some other markets, but it was decidedly clunky in operation, by all accounts.
No Up GTI for South Africa: Yes, the Wolfsburg-based brand did develop an Up GTI, but the little warm hatch unfortunately never made it to South Africa. The cheekily styled baby GTI employed a 1.0-litre, 3-cylinder turbopetrol engine sending 85 kW and 200 Nm of torque to the front wheels via a 6-speed manual cog-swapper, resulting in a claimed 8.8-second dash to 100 kph and a top speed of 197 kph.
VWSA blamed the Rand’s poor exchange rate for the Up GTI’s no-show on local shores, suggesting the tiny tyke’s would-be pricing would have seen it competing with far larger models in the range. In addition, the South African market didn’t ever receive the option of an R-Line package for the Up, while the fully electric e-Up likewise failed to materialise in Mzansi.
How much is a used VW Up in South Africa?
Though the Up was covered by a 3-year/120 000 km warranty, it did without a standard service plan in South Africa. So, when shopping for a used model, make sure there’s evidence that the vehicle has been regularly serviced (VWSA’s recommended intervals were 1 year or every 15 000 km).
Somewhat unusually for an A-segment car, the Up was available with many optional extras, including a panoramic sunroof and various equipment packages. Early versions of the Take grade could be specified with a comfort package (which added front electric windows and a height-adjustable driver seat), while the Move trim level could be bolstered with a driver package (adding cruise control, rear parking sensors and a multi-function display) and a winter package (with heated seats and front fog lamps).
Of the used Volkswagen Up examples listed on Cars.co.za at the time of writing, 69% were 5-door models. The mid-tier Move grade was the most widespread, accounting for 51% of listings, followed by the entry-level Take specification (28%). Cross and Beats derivatives each made up around 10%, with the remaining 1% representing the seldom-seen Colour and Club variants.
The most common model year was 2016, followed by 2018. Mileages varied from just 23 000 km to a lofty (for a city car, anyway) 268 000 km, with the latter achieved by a 2015 3-door in Move trim. White was the most popular colour at 43% of all listed Up models, followed by silver (24%) and red (12%).
Below R100 000: Units listed for 5 figures were in short supply, but most were predictably early model years with mileages above 150 000 km. We also found a 2019 Beats variant here, though it was heavily modified (featuring components such as large aftermarket alloys and air suspension).
From R100 000 to R125 000: Pickings are slim below R125 000 as well, with most vehicles listed here being pre-facelift examples in 3-door guise. Interestingly, the Move trim level was still easily the most popular grade between these pricing bookends.
From R125 000 to R150 000: At the time of writing, this was the most densely populated pricing bracket, with nearly half of all listings positioned here. All model years but the final one were represented, while we found a small number of Cross and Beats examples in this space.
R150 000 and up: Spending upwards of R150 000 would get you into a facelifted 5-door Up, potentially with well under 100 000 km on the clock. Most of the few Cross and Beats variants on offer were found here, too. The most expensive Up we uncovered was a 2018 Cross with 39 000 km on the odometer (and fitted with a few factory options) for R199 900.
Which Volkswagen Up should I buy?
So, which derivatives should be on your radar? Well, unless you have your heart set on the 3-door body style, we’d recommend sticking to examples of the facelifted model, since these gained extra standard equipment, including the much-improved infotainment- and all-important stability control systems.
While the Take grade gained some kit at the mid-cycle update, we’d argue the Move spec still offers slightly better value today (however, we’d suggest trying to find an example fitted with the optional 15-inch alloys). Naturally, the Beats derivative is best suited to audiophiles, while the plucky little Cross will hold broad appeal with buyers keen on the extra ride height and those SUV-inspired looks.
Is the VW Up a smart used purchase?
During its 5-year run on the local market, the Volkswagen Up had to contend with various similarly sized rivals, from the TA-series Kia Picanto and BA-generation Hyundai i10 to a trio of platform siblings in the form of the 2nd-gen Toyota Aygo, AB40-series Citroen C1 and Peugeot 108 (the under-appreciated latter model boasting segment-leading levels of safety kit).
Other traditional – but more “cheap and cheerful” – city-car options included the Honda Brio and the underwhelming A00-series Mitsubishi Mirage, as well as Suzuki’s FE-gen Celerio and the high-roofed (though short-lived locally) Splash. In addition, the VW Up was pitched against a few more upmarket competitors, with the 3-door version fighting the Fiat 500 and Opel Adam, and the 5-door variant taking on the W453-gen Smart ForFour (the latter featuring a rear-engine, rear-wheel-drive configuration).
That said, the Volkswagen Up’s eminently solid build quality helped set it apart from its more obviously built-to-a-budget mainstream rivals, endowing it with a sense of sophistication that was out of the ordinary for the segment. In short, it didn’t feel like a small budget car, whether from a driving perspective, or simply in terms of its cabin structure.
So, why didn’t this charming little car sell in greater volumes in South Africa? Well, that was largely down to the tremendous popularity of the Polo Vivo, which was so strong that it almost prevented the Up’s local introduction altogether. And it’s also why the Volkswagen Up remains a somewhat overlooked – yet still entirely compelling – option on the used market today.
Because electric vehicles require notably less maintenance than cars with internal combustion engines, legacy car brands and their dealers sacrifice future revenue whenever they sell a new EV. What does that mean for your car ownership future?
Do you buy a new car every 3 years? Probably not. Very few people do. However, 3 years is an important marker: that’s when most new-car warranties end and car maintenance can become rather expensive.
Even with the most intriguing lease or guaranteed future value finance deals, most drivers will keep a car for 5 years or longer. The latest data supports the reality that it’s more a case of “longer than 5 years”.
The United States is the world’s most developed car market (where owners are also daily drivers) and Americans are keeping their vehicles longer than ever due to the new-car affordability crisis. Suffice it to say, that if consumers in the ‘States are struggling to buy new cars, all global car buyers are struggling.
In America, where prices and lease deals are many times more attractive than in South Africa, average car ownership has edged towards 10 years. That’s a telling statistic that helps to explain why electric vehicle (EV) uptake is so low. And it has less to do with price, and a lot to do with how car companies and dealerships make money from car buyers and owners.
For the record, EV uptake in South Africa is very low. Much lower than most people think, because BEVs (battery-electric vehicles, also known as fully-electric vehicles) are cleverly clustered with hybrids, and reported as NEVs (new-energy vehicles). And that’s sneaky, because only 267 true EVs were sold in South Africa – a market that recorded slightly more than 500 000 new car sales – last year.
Cars are produced to make money, not aid mobility
Look, the car industry’s mission is not to provide affordable transport… That’s supposed to be the role of public infrastructure, such as trains and other shared transport options. Most carmakers produce models that appeal to fulfil the desires of specific types of customers – but they’re usually wants, not needs.
High-performance cars aren’t necessary, but they have a considerable safety margin when overtaking slower traffic on the N1 or during emergency braking and collision avoidance. Same with luxury SUVs. Nobody needs ’em, but they serve a purpose when you want to undertake the most comfortable journey when and to where you like – from home to an exclusive lodge or venue at the end of an untarred road.
And for car companies to finance all of the diversity they provide the market in models and derivatives, they need to make money – lots of it. Despite the high purchase price of new vehicles, the profit margins aren’t as phenomenal as you assume, especially on affordable cars, which have the lowest margins.
Most car companies rely on specialist suppliers and contract engineers to develop and produce the necessary technology, creating vehicles that meet regulatory standards and trigger customer interest regarding features. But those technology suppliers take a primary profit, reducing the end profit for car companies, from the price you pay their dealers.
But why is that important, and what does it have to do with the issues around EV adoption and pricing? It’s about where the real profits happen in the car business and how more EV sales, which can only happen when carmakers introduce smaller, better and more affordable electric cars, is an existential threat to many car companies and their business models.
How car companies prefer to make money
Some companies control their own technology and vertical integration (Tesla, for example) or manage the balance between internal R&D and external suppliers brilliantly (such as Porsche and Toyota), but most car companies rely heavily on services and maintenance for dealership profitability.
OEM-guaranteed parts are a significant part of a car company’s revenue stream; most dealerships would never survive purely on new-car sales margins. The service centre/workshop is where the real money is made because many drivers keep their cars well after their service- (from 2 to 5 years) or maintenance plan (usually 5 years) has expired. The cost of maintaining a modern car beyond its initial service plan can become significant for owners and is wonderfully profitable for car companies and their dealerships.
With a new-car affordability crisis in most markets, the longer duration of car ownership and extended wear period means a tidy business in parts and servicing for the automotive parts supply chain.
EVs and evaporated service revenue
But what happens when the cars that a brand is retailing through its dealerships no longer require servicing or at least need only a fraction of the servicing a legacy petrol or diesel vehicle would? That’s the promise that EV advocates have been championing for years, but it’s very bad business for OEMs, parts manufacturers and dealerships.
EVs have so few moving parts compared to petrol or diesel-engined vehicles and, because they are devoid of complex lubrication-, cooling- and gearbox systems, their servicing costs are minimal.
Car companies speak publically about their willingness to create more EVs and be part of a global effort to decarbonise transport. But the truth is that for every new EV they sell, they lose the future servicing revenue on a petrol or diesel car – and that’s not great business.
The only people not complaining about more EVs are tyre manufacturers. Due to their sheer weight and generous torque delivery of EV motors, tyre wear has become an unexpected maintenance factor for battery-powered cars. But all those tyre profits aren’t being earned by the car companies who make EVs.
Tyre purchasing and fitment are services that vehicle owners can access without going to an official dealership. The revenue of EV-induced tyre wear is ringfenced beyond traditional car companies and their dealers – again, not great for business.
EVs, data and in-car service revenue
EVs are expensive to build and offer manufacturers and their dealers none of the downstream revenue sources of petrol and diesel cars. That begs the question: why would carmakers want to sell more EVs?
Surely revenue substitution planning must be happening at legacy car companies? With vast R&D resources, brilliant market research and laser-focused product development, car companies must have a solution for the issue of EVs diluting traditional revenue streams, right? But, what if they don’t?
If EVs are the future, and governments keep incentivising people to buy them, will many traditional car brands falter because their dealerships might go out of business without conventional servicing revenue?
Clever consultants with impressive PowerPoint presentations and slide decks promise legacy car companies that data harvesting and in-car services are the future.
EVs are designed to be more software-integrated and offer impressive driver- and passenger-centric UX, which should stimulate higher customer demand for in-car data services. Drivers are also familiar with large screens and menus because digital interfacing is omnipresent in our lives. But there are issues…
Privacy laws make data harvesting contentious, and you must have the best UX and flawless software deployment to deliver in-car services that people are willing to pay for. And the truth is that traditional car companies have made a mild disaster of software development and in-house UX.
Who will profit from in-car services?
But what about data services, streaming video, and those proximity venue/retail suggestions as you drive? Are those services you expect and trust from Apple and Google, or your car’s operating system?
A car company data-service platform with menu lag, software bugs and poor UX cannot compete with that of an established tech company (even if “over-the-air” online updates have become ubiquitous). That is why most brands make their infotainment systems compatible with Android Auto and Apple CarPlay; it’s a tacit acknowledgement that there’s no way that they could develop a superior interface.
The question of mobility risk isn’t unfamiliar to South African drivers… Any VIP protection specialist will admit that people are most vulnerable when they enter or exit a vehicle. Do you want all your vehicle movement and associated personal routine data to be available and potentially hackable? No, you don’t.
Simply put, car companies and their dealers can’t make money from affordable EVs and future data and in-car service revenue will be pocketed by Big Tech, not legacy car companies. Traditional servicing costs create revenue for the car industry, and increased EV uptake is too much of a risk to that business.
10 best-selling bakkies in South Africa: February 2024
The numbers are in! Here your monthly look at South Africa’s best-selling (as well as least popular) bakkies, this time for February 2024…
In February 2024, South Africa’s new-vehicle market endured a marginal year-on-year decline of 0.9% to end on 44 749 units. Bucking the industry trend yet again, the light-commercial vehicle (LCV) segment experienced some growth, improving 2.5% to 13 306 units.
So, what happened on the list of South Africa’s best-selling bakkies? Well, while every single contender in the top 10 enjoyed some sort of month-on-month growth, there wasn’t all that much movement on the table, with only one bakkie climbing the ranks.
Sales of the Toyota Hilux grew to a pleasingly round 3 100 units in February 2024, giving the Prospecton-produced bakkie range – which will soon welcome both 48V mild-hybrid derivatives (see pricing for the Hilux MHEV here) and a new widebody GR Sport variant – the monthly crown once more.
That meant the Silverton-built Ford Ranger (2 187 units) – with the high-Performance Raptor version fresh off winning the Leisure Double Cab title at the 2023/24 Cars.co.za Consumer Awards – again had to settle for 2nd position, ending the month 913 units off the pace. The Struandale-made Isuzu D-Max (1 740 units) completed the podium, with its tally lifted by 416 sales to government.
In its penultimate month of manufacture at Rosslyn, the Nissan NP200 (1 276 units) surged back into 4 figures to retain 4th place, boosted by 260 sales to the rental industry. Meanwhile, the KwaZulu-Natal-assembled Mahindra Pik Up ended February 2024 on 715 units, its best monthly showing in almost a year.
The only bakkie to move up the table last month was the Rosslyn-produced Nissan Navara (449 units, including 114 sales to government), which climbed a single spot to 6th. That saw the GWM P-Series (378 units) fall a ranking to 7th, though the Chinese-built contender remained the highest-placed imported bakkie.
While sales of the Volkswagen Amarok improved to 324 units, the Ford-built bakkie stayed in 8th position. The refreshed Toyota Land Cruiser 79 (now available in 4-cylinder guise, complete with an automatic transmission), meanwhile, wasn’t far behind in 9th on 315 registrations. Finally, the GWM Steed (146 units) completed the table.
Best of the rest in February 2024: bakkies outside top 10
So, which bakkies didn’t crack the top 10 in February 2024? Well, the JAC T-Series – the Chinese automaker unfortunately reports only a combined figure for its T6, T8 and T9 line-ups – was next on 143 units, finishing ahead of the Mitsubishi Triton (88 units) and Mahindra Bolero (39 units).
Then came the Peugeot Landtrek, with a total of 24 units. As a reminder, this Stellantis-backed bakkie is expected to go into production in Coega (near Gqeberha in the Eastern Cape) by early 2026. Meanwhile, the Mazda BT-50 repeated its January 2024 effort of 15 units, meaning it has accumulated 30 sales so far this year (compared with just 69 over the entirety of 2023).
That meant the Jeep Gladiator (a facelifted version is scheduled to launch in Mzansi only towards the end of this year) again brought up the rear, ending the 2nd month of 2024 on 8 registrations.
10 best-selling bakkies in South Africa for February 2024