BMW 1 Series (2019) International Launch Review

We've had the opportunity to sample this – the all-new BMW 1 Series – in Munich, Germany. Has the loss of the 3.0-litre straight-6 engine and a switch to a (primarily) front-wheel-drive layout affected the premium hatchback's famed driving experience? Is its interior now well and truly up to date? Does it look like an SUV? It's time to find out…

As an entry point to the brand, the 1 Series is pivotal for BMW. The premium hatchback has a funkier, more youthful appeal to BMW's increasingly conservative and upmarket 3 Series sedan, which has become out of reach for many consumers who want to buy into the Bavarian brand (from new). Their first port of call is now most likely to be the often controversial 1 Series, so the fundamentals of the F40-generation car need to be right.


The all-new BMW 1 Series adopts the brand's latest exterior styling language and has switched to a front-wheel-drive focused platform

Controversy has most certainly followed this newcomer too! When the new 1 Series broke cover, many of our users reacted negatively to its styling. "Looks like a baby SUV," was the most common complaint. Even though the old cliche: "photos don't really do it justice" applies, the F40 does kind of resemble a new addition to BMW's X family. However, when you walk around the vehicle and view it from multiple angles, it quickly loses its SUV figure and settles into a more pleasing hatchback shape. Of course, because the 1 Series is a new BMW, its grille is a hot topic. In this iteration, not only does the grille dominate – in M135i xDrive spec, it looks fantastic with intricate detailing. Lesser models have to make do with a plainer grille. 

Own a BMW? Tell us about your experience here

Platform


Being the performance variant, the BMW M135i needs to have the aggressive looks. A wing and twin exhausts should do it.

The F40-generation 1 Series is built on the UKL2 platform, which simply means the 1 Series is no longer a rear-wheel driven. This platform focuses on front-wheel drive and all-wheel drive setups and makes provision for electrification. Current BMW Group models built on this modular architecture range from the X1 and X2 crossovers to the Mini Clubman and Mini Countryman. While petrolheads are upset, we can see the logic behind BMW's strategy. Not only is it cheaper to have more models sharing the same platform, but BMW claims there are notable gains in terms of interior space.


The 1 Series' cabin space has increased in several dimensions thanks to the new platform.

Speaking of space, the newcomer will be sold exclusively as a 5-door hatchback. Front- and rear occupants are availed 42 mm and 13 mm extra elbow room respectively, but, more importantly, aft passengers benefit from an additional 33 mm of knee room and 19 mm of headroom (if the outward-opening sliding panoramic sunroof is specified, BMW's press material notes). The Bimmer's luggage capacity is also said to have increased by an additional 20 litres. The total now sits at 380 litres, but if you fold the 40/20/40 rear seats down, you gain access to 1 200 litres of utility space.

Cabin


The cabin gains the new digital dashboard seen in the X5, 3 Series and X7. 

When you step inside the newcomer's cabin, it's immediately apparent that most of the criticisms of the previous model's interior have been addressed. Firstly, the 1 Series' fascia has a fresh, modern and connected appeal, thanks primarily to the introduction of BMW's Operating System 7.0. We've experienced the comprehensive system, which encompasses an all-digital instrument cluster and crisp-looking and slick touchscreen infotainment interface in a number of new BMWs, and every time we've come away impressed with its intuitive functionality. In the new 1 Series, things are no different; we sampled the "Hey BMW" assistant, swiped away using gesture control and made full use of the wireless charging pad. Even though the F20 was only recently discontinued, it now looks and feels positively ancient inside compared to its successor's s(l)ick setup.


The crisp digital instrument cluster is not only aesthetically pleasing – it displays a host of information in the space provided.

SA's 1 Series engines

With a healthy balance of turbopetrol and -diesel engine choices, with the option of 2- or all-wheel drive, the 1 Series' line-up is diverse. However, South Africa will only be getting 2 petrol-powered derivatives initially, with diesel-powered versions coming later. Kicking off the range is the 118i, which is powered by a 1.5-litre turbocharged 3-cylinder engine. It produces 103 kW and 220 Nm, giving it a claimed 0-100 kph time of 8.5 seconds.

It's available with either a 6-speed manual or a 7-speed dual-clutch transmission. We'll have final clarity on transmission choice for the SA market closer to the vehicle's launch. The diesel options include the 116d (85 kW/270 Nm), 118d (110 kW/350 Nm) and 120d xDrive (140 kW/400 Nm).

M135i powertrain


The 3.0-litre straight-6 engine is gone and has been replaced by a transversely-mounted 2.0-litre 4-cylinder motor

The now-discontinued M140i's 3.0-litre straight-6 is undoubtedly revered by BMW aficionados, but the M135i xDrive's all-new 2.0-litre 4-cylinder engine is no slouch. It stems from BMW's modular B48 family, but has been revised to deliver additional performance. Interestingly, this engine also does duty in the X2 M35i as well as JCW-branded Mini models. The twin-scroll turbocharged motor produces 225 kW and 450 Nm, which puts the flagship version of the new 1 Series right in the middle of the current crop of 2.0-litre turbocharged all-wheel-drive hatchbacks. In fact, a quick glance at the Cars.co.za Compare New Cars tool suggests the Bavarian hatch packs a 50 Newton metre advantage over its rivals. Cue dramatic music!

With power going to all 4 wheels via BMW's xDrive all-wheel-drive system, the M135i should be quick – and it is, with a claimed 0-100 kph time of 4.8 seconds thanks to a launch control system (supported by ARB – actuator contiguous wheel slip limitation technology borrowed from the BMW i3s) and a quick-shifting 8-speed automatic transmission. Despite its performance slant, it boasts a claimed economy figure of 7.1 L-6.8 L/100 km.

What's it like to drive?


There's an admirable focus on ride quality and comfort in the new BMW 1 Series, but the real test will be on SA roads

We had an opportunity to sample the blue M135i xDrive you see here as well as a diesel derivative. Given that we're not likely to receive the latter in the immediate future, we chose to spend our time behind the wheel of the range-topper.

The driving experience commences the moment you plant your posterior in the body-hugging driver's seat. We're told that front sports seats will be standard fare, but we'll confirm that closer to the 1's SA launch in October. Stab that engine start button and hear that new motor fire up. If you're a petrolhead, you're most likely to select Sport mode from the get-go (to prompt those exhaust flaps to open up). The sound is a deep, throaty burble especially when the engine's cold, but we can't say its radically different to that of, say, an Audi S3. Granted, there's only so much acoustic trickery one can apply to the note of a 4-cylinder engine, but thankfully BMW has tuned it to emit generic pops and splutters on overrun. The best part? Even when the M135i xDrive is in Comfort mode, you're reminded that this is the performance version – a pleasant, engaging engine hum is omnipresent.


In its most aggressive settings, the BMW M135i made some terrific noises when accelerating at full throttle.

The new launch control system engages promptly, compared with those of previous dual-clutch-transmission-endowed M models that tended to hesitate (as if to insist on absolutely perfect conditions before they'd deliver the goods). The revs build, a Launch Control Active message appears on the digital dash' and then you release the brake pedal. You can either shift cogs yourself or, do what we did: let the 'box do its business. The 1st gear is short enough to give you a slingshot feeling as the Bimmer hurtles towards the horizon and I appreciated the loud tyre chirps between gear changes; they enhance the sensation of performance. It'd be ever so simple to dial them out with electronic intervention, but we're glad they're there.

Speaking of gear changes, you can actuate them by using the steering-wheel-mounted shift paddles, but note that when you manually change up at high revs, the next gear arrives with a deliciously mechanical thud. It's not too dissimilar to a hard dual-clutch 'box upshift, which is satisfying, but perhaps some users may complain about "whiplash"? The in-gear acceleration is thoroughly satisfying – the engine delivers its maximum torque on the proverbial silver platter from as low as 1 750 rpm and the thrust duly continues until the redline comes up. Grab the next gear, rinse and repeat! 


The xDrive offers terrific grip and inspires you to press on, something you couldn't casually do in the rear-wheel-drive 1 Series.

Being an M Sport model, the M135i xDrive features a thick-rimmed steering wheel as standard. It's not to my personal preference (I am happier with a slightly thinner rim), but aficionados will be most pleased. As for steering feel, the flagship comes with an electromechanical M Sport steering setup, which is thankfully not as ultra-direct or darty like that of the Z4 M40i, but conveys a modicum of sporty feel. However, there's always room for improvement; BMW should draw inspiration from hot hatches with "talkative tillers", such as the Honda Civic Type R and Renault Megane RS.

In terms of ride quality, our media launch units rode on 18-inch alloy wheels wrapped in Pirelli 225/40 R18 rubber. Despite the smallish size of these wheels, I think they looked the part and offered a fair blend of ride comfort and dynamic grip. However, on some of the coarser surfaces, some road noise presented itself, but it wasn't excessive. Our test units also featured optional adaptive damping, which aided the suspension's pliancy.


These 18-inch alloy wheels looked great. M Performance brakes are standard fare on the M135i

As our test route comprised B-roads through Bavarian hamlets and a few stints on the Autobahn, we didn't push the newcomer to its limits, but got a good inkling of its capabilities. I'll discuss the merits of the xDrive (the M135i comes with a Torsen limited-slip differential mounted to its front axle) in the next section, but suffice to say I experienced enough of the range-topper on this "first date" to make me very keen to sample it on home turf a second time. When the test team reviews the newcomer on our favourites stretches of twisty tarmac, more of the BMWs talents will come to light.  

M135i vs M140i?

It seems the question that nearly everyone wants an answer to is this: Can this new M135i xDrive match the outgoing M140i (a finalist in the hot hatch category of the 2018/19 #CarsAwards) in terms of performance? Truth be told, there's no simple answer to that – you cannot compare the 2 vehicles with their on-paper specifications. This isn't a game of top trumps. Yes, there are detractors lined up on social media with their metaphorical pitchforks at the ready to lynch anyone who doesn't show due reverence to the straight-6, but the critical factor here is accessible performance.

I'd bet the majority of BMW M140i owners have not ventured into the "DSC Off" territory and tried to coax their cars' rears to step out deliberately. The risks are simply too great on public roads and if you dare to explore the limits of your personal car on a race track, your maintenance plan will go up in smoke if BMW finds out about it. Purists will always hold rear-wheel-drive in high regard, but with the addition of xDrive, BMW has made its flagship 1 Series' performance limits more safely attainable. An average driver will feel the confidence to press on, even in lower-grip conditions, without this constant worry in the back of their mind that, should their vehicle suddenly want to pirouette, they'd be skilful/lucky enough to control it.


How pretty are these performance seats? They're also very comfortable and feel upmarket.

The primary benefit of the xDrive setup is that it endows the M135i with a tremendous amount of mechanical grip. We estimate that it'd take some serious talent from a BMW M140i driver to try to overtake a newer M135i xDrive on a tight and twisty road, especially when it's wet or even damp.  In slippery conditions, the newer car will simply make the most of what grip it can muster and power away into the distance. Some of you have asked if BMW could fit a more potent engine in this new 1 Series? In terms of what's possible engineering-wise, no… This new platform only works with the engine mounted in a transverse position (parallel to the front axle), so a longitudinally-mounted straight-6 engine won't physically fit.

Verdict


It's a big step forward for the BMW 1 Series and it brings new levels of tech and refinement to the premium hatchback segment

Does the all-new BMW 1 Series impress? Once you see the newcomer in the metal and realise that photos obscure its hatchback proportions, you'll disregard derogatory comments such as "It looks like an SUV!" The cabin deserves the lion's share of the praise because the previous generation's interior felt outdated compared with those of its digital dashboard-endowed rivals. Given the arrival of Mercedes-Benz MBUX and Audi Virtual Cockpit, BMW desperately needed something to match its rivals and the F40-generation car's infotainment system is a significant step up. Having experienced it in many applications, we've become quite fond of its slick touchscreen interface and gorgeous graphics. As for the luggage capacity and occupant space improvements yielded by the new platform, the 1 Series is more practical than before, but it's still no "family hatchback".


Whereas previous versions of the 1 Series offered meagre luggage compartments, the F40 generation's load bay is at least workable.

On balance, does the switch to an all-new platform work? Yes, it does. While the newcomer's improvements are incremental, they're enough to make this the most sensible 1 Series to date, especially in terms of the packaging. The build quality is even better than before, so much so that it feels more solid and better finished inside than the Mercedes-Benz A-Class. It's ahead of the Audi A3 in most departments too, but in the Ingolstadt-based firm's defence, there's an all-new A3 due in 2020. It'll be very illuminating to compare the 3 combatants back-to-back when the time comes.

To reiterate, our first taste of the all-new 1 Series was restricted to the M135i xDrive. While we lament the departure of the soulful 3.0-litre straight-6, we appreciate BMW's efforts to make the new 2.0-litre twin-scrolled turbo 4-pot as tractable and charismatic-sounding as possible. Granted, it's going to be damn-near impossible to replicate that glorious wail of the 6, but there's enough of a performance "note" to keep things interesting. 

With this flagship derivative, BMW has elbowed its way into a segment dominated by the Audi S3, Volkswagen Golf R and Mercedes-AMG A35, the latter of which will soon be launched in the South African market. The M135i xDrive may be late to the party, but I'm glad it's here (well, you know, proverbially speaking…) and given the anodyne handling traits of the current crop of all-wheel-drive 2.0-litre turbocharged hot hatches, it's fair to say that the BMW injects some genuine vigour into the segment. We're itching to put all of them together for a face-off and see which one ends on top.

BMW 1 Series Price in South Africa (July 2019)

The all-new BMW 1 Series will be arriving in South Africa in October 2019, with 2 models offered initially. 

BMW 118i – R480 897

BMW M135i – R705 451

Further Reading

BMW Showcases All-New 1 Series with M Performance Parts

Front-Driven BMW 1 Series to use i3 Traction Tech

Can BMW Build an AMG-rivalling 2.0-litre Turbo?

Hennessey Ranger VelociRaptor Unleashed

If there was one easy criticism of the Ford Ranger Raptor, it would be the choice of a diesel powertrain. Petrolheads are craving authentic muscle and it appears that Hennessey Performance has the solution.

While we like the 2.0-litre twin-turbocharged diesel setup in the new Ford Ranger Raptor, we do find ourselves asking if diesel is the most appropriate fuel for a performance bakkie. Hennessey Performance has killed 2 birds with 1 stone as it not only replaces the diesel engine with a petrol-powered engine but also gives the American market a hardcore Ranger as the Ranger Raptor is not sold there. This is the 2019 Hennessey VelociRaptor Ford Ranger!

Hennessey Performance is famous for its work on the F-150 Raptor and has used its bakkie expertise on the current Ford Ranger, which is sold in the United States with a turbocharged 2.3-litre petrol engine. In stock tune, it delivers 200 kW and 420 Nm, but after some under-the-bonnet work from Hennessey Performance, power is increased to 261 kW and 521 Nm. These gains are achieved thanks to the addition of a new high-flow air induction kit, less restrictive stainless steel exhaust system as well as an engine control unit (ECU) reflash. In terms of acceleration, the uprated Ranger hits 100 kph in a claimed 6.1 seconds, which is a 1.3-second improvement.

However, there's so much more to this vehicle than just engine performance. It also features proper offroad kit in the form of Hennessey's Stage 1 suspension upgrade which sees ride height increased by 10 cm. There are also monster BF Goodrich All-Terrain Tires 285/70 R17 offroad tyres and for those wanting more offroad goodies, you can opt for a winch too. Flared wheel arches are thrown into the mix for some proper visual appeal.

“We are so excited to introduce our 2019 Hennessey VelociRaptor upgrades for the 2019 Ford Ranger truck,” said company founder & CEO, John Hennessey. “The demand for our VelociRaptor upgrades for the Ford Raptor truck has been incredible over the past 10 years. We are thrilled to be able to offer increased power, performance – on and off-road all packed in our exclusively-branded VelociRaptor package.”

As for the price, well Hennessey will sell you one for $64 950 which comes to around R900 500, before import duty. Hennessey will be making just 500 of these bad boys, and for the American market who don't have access to the Ranger Raptor, this is the next best thing. 

Hennessey VelociRaptor vs Ford F-150 Raptor Drag Race

Further Reading

Ford Ranger Raptor (2019) Launch Review

Building the Ford Ranger Raptor

 

First Ford Ranger Raptor Built in SA

Ford Ranger Raptor: 7 Things You Need to Know

Mercedes-Benz to axe the X-Class?

Rumours are rife that Daimler will be killing off the Mercedes-Benz X-Class double-cab bakkie completely. Here's what we know.

According to Automotive News Europe, the Mercedes-Benz X-Class is going to be cancelled as parent company Daimler posted another profit warning recently. 

Much was expected of the X-Class when it was launched back in 2017, but it was simply too expensive in comparison to its more established rivals and lacked the premium feel that most expect from the 3-pointed star. Automotive News Europe reported that only 16 700 units were sold in 2018 around the world, which is pitiful, given the numbers that Toyota Hilux, Ford Ranger, Nissan Navara and Volkswagen Amarok are doing. 

Perhaps the worst business decision was to not offer the X-Class to the bakkie/pickup-crazed Americans where it surely would have had some degree of success. The writing was already on the wall as former Daimler boss Dieter Zetsche cancelled plans to build the Mercedes-Benz X-Class in Argentina for the South American markets. 

As for the profit warnings, this is Daimler's 4th forecast in 13 months, with the brand preparing to pay dearly for diesel emission irregularities and vehicle recalls.

Further Reading

X-Class Future in Doubt

Mercedes-Benz X-Class Edition 1 Revealed

Mercedes-Benz X-Class by Carlex Design

Maybach-inspired Mercedes-Benz X-Class Anyone?

Mercedes Benz X-Class (2018) Video Review

VW’s Got a New 6-Speed Manual

Volkswagen has engineered a new six-speed manual that should reduce consumption.

VW might be directing most of its engineering resources at electrification, but it remains committed to providing updated elements for its internal-combustion vehicles too.

Although manual transmissions might be featuring on fewer vehicles than a decade ago, they do reduce the purchasing price point of any model – making them particularly attractive to buyers in the more affordable segments, where a few thousand Rands make a real difference.

The latest transmission advancement from VW carries an internal company codename of MQ281, and it is a six-speed manual transmission with significantly reduced friction. Built around a 2.5 shaft concept, the MQ281 boasts a high gear spread peak of 7.89, which should allow you to short-shift it into higher ratios at cruising speeds – reducing fuel burn. 

VW’s engineers focussed on incorporating smoother running bearings and slicker seals to improve the mechanical meshing and optimise lubrication. This new six-speed manual also requires less oil than any of VW’s previous manual transmission.

Housed in a new casing the MQ281 transmission externalises less vibration too, which should improve the NVH of those VW’s optioned with it. The company has not confirmed an exact production roll-out of the new transmission, beyond that it will debut in the Passat – with Golf8 the next likely candidate.

According to VW’s technical specification for the MQ281 transmission, it is torque output rated for between 200- and 340Nm, which covers a very broad spread of the brand’s current 1- to 2-litre engines.

Read about the next Golf 8 here:

Official Volkswagen Golf 8 Sketches Released

New Volkswagen Golf 8 – What to Expect

Spy Shots: 2020 Volkswagen Golf 8 GTI

BMW M1 Procar: SentiMETAL Stories

The rare BMW M1 supercar – the first official "M model" that the Bavarian brand produced – is an icon, but the racing version, the M1 Procar… that's the stuff dreams are made of! Cars.co.za attended the BMW M1 Procar revival held at the Norisring, in Nuremberg, Germany in July 2019.

In celebrating 40 years since the M1 Procar appeared on a race circuit, BMW Group Classic unleashed not just 1, but 14 examples to the street circuit of the Norisring. Not only were the cars present, but some of the original drivers were there too. Jan Lammers and Marc Surer, both of whom are former F1 and Le Mans 24 Hour drivers, raced these cars competitively 40 years ago; it was epic to see them pilot these machines again.

The creation of the M1 and M1 Procar is a fascinating story. Designed by Giorgio Giugiaro, the mid-engined BMW M1 was created for homologation purposes (the Bavarian manufacturer hoped to compete with Porsche in the Group 5 championship). Interestingly, it had a Lamborghini connection as the Sant Agata-based supercar firm was contracted to supply the body and the chassis. However, the Italians ran into cashflow difficulties and Italian companies Marchesi and T.I.R. took over to supply the M1's spaceframe and glass-fibre reinforced plastic bodyshell respectively.

Designer Giugiaro's outfit ItalDesign assembled and supplied the interiors for the M1s, after which the vehicles were shipped to Germany for the fitment of mechanical components and final assembly. The BMW M1 made its official debut in 1978 and came to market with a 3.5-litre 24-valve straight-6 petrol engine. With outputs of 204 kW and 330 Nm, it was capable of a top speed of 260 kph – potent for the era. It's interesting to note that this engine also featured in the E28 M5 (the world's first super saloon) and E24 M635i CSi, as well as the South African special 745i.


After the Norisring event in Nuremberg, we caught up with a pair of BMW M1 Procars arriving back at BMW Group Classic in Munich

However, when BMW developed the road-going supercar into a track-focused racer (as it had originally intended), things changed dramatically. As you can see, the bewinged M1 Procar looks race-ready, with a dominant rear wing, flared wheel arches and, depending on which category it competed, a more powerful motor. Revisions to the M88 saw power climb to 345 kW and 390 Nm, while later Group 5 versions were turbocharged, with cars developing between 630 kW and 745 kW (1 000 hp)! The additional power meant the top speed moved beyond 320 kph. Under the skin, there were revisions to the suspension and braking setups, to cope with the extreme stresses of demanding circuit racing.


Few things are as emotional as watching a BMW M1 Procar hurtle down the main straight at full throttle.

The Procar Series formed part of a typical European Formula 1 race weekend, where 5 of the fastest F1 drivers in practice would be invited to race BMW M1 Procars against one another, as well as other racers. In terms of marketing and public relations value, the strategy was priceless. In its first season in 1978, the overall winner was the late (3-time F1 champion) Niki Lauda, with (another 3-time F1 champion) Nelson Piquet taking the title the following year. The BMW M1 Procar wasn't just an F1 attraction though – it competed at Le Mans as well as many championships around the world. The BMW M1 Procar series lasted just 2 seasons and was cut short when BMW shifted focus from Procar to creating F1 engines. 

Watch SA-born DTM racer meet the iconic BMW M1 Procar

 

11 minutes of glorious BMW M1 Procar goodness…

 

Why BMW’s Supercar is an unnecessary risk

At a time when mass manufacturers, especially premium marques, are racing towards electrification, BMW announces a new supercar project. Can the Bavarian brand not learn from its past mistakes?

BMW does not often make a product planning error, but its M1 mid-engined supercar remains the brand’s most heroic failure. 

During the tumultuous '70s, a decade which saw fuel rationing and huge energy price surges, the wedge-shaped supercar emerged. Lamborghini’s Countach created a product target with the promise of enticingly fat margins and the technically resource-rich German brands responded. 

Mercedes-Benz’s 1970s supercar was the C111 – but sense prevailed and it was never produced in notable numbers beyond a few concept cars. BMW was far more daring. It built the M1, a homologated supercar with great agility, but one crucial issue – way too few cylinders for its purpose.


As a supercar, the M1 had too few cylinders and not enough power.

Supercars are about dramatic design and the promise of crushing performance. Owners might never use even a fraction of the performance available, but statistics support status and a supercar must either have a large engine or a very powerful one – preferably both. 

The M1 was powered by naturally-aspirated 3.5-litre 24-valve in-line six, whilst its rivals featured much larger V8 and V12 engines. Complicating matters even more for M1 was the presence of Porsche’s first 911 Turbo, which came to market at the same time. 

History has chronicled the M1 as a heroic failure, but now BMW has confirmed that it is going to try a supercar again. Is that a better idea, this time around?

The 1990s BMW supercar revival – that didn’t happen

A decade after the M1 disaster, BMW was convinced to attempt another supercar, lured by the extreme automotive materialism of the 1980s. 

By 1991, a concept, called the Nazca, was ready. It looked fantastic and was powered by a V12 engine instead of an in-line six, but BMW became nervous and cancelled the project. Shortly thereafter, BMW supplied a V12 engine for McLaren to use in one of the most iconic supercars, the F1. 


The 90s BMW Nazca, a supercar project BMW binned before production.

Without any threat of a pending supercar from Mercedes-Benz, there was no need for BMW to develop anything of the type during the mid-1990s. 

Today’s supercars are massively expensive vehicles that share virtually no components with any other platform – and that makes them very problematic for large automotive companies to produce. The profit margins and brand development might entice, but often the production cost of designing, engineering and manufacturing a low-volume supercar is ruinous and can create unnecessary drag on an automotive company with a large and/or diverse product portfolio. 

Supercars don’t make sense if you build sedans and SUVs

If you list brands that dominate the market for outrageous road machines, they mostly have 1 thing in common: their raison d'être is the production of super- and hypercars. McLaren. Lamborghini. Ferrari. Pagani. Koenigsegg. But for Lamborghini, none of these car companies does anything else but produce exotic supercars (the St'Agata-based firm recently branched off with the Urus performance-SUV based on the VW Group's MLBevo platform). Their staffing, design resources and production assets are expertly tailored for low-volume, labour-intensive production.

There is no distraction among the staff of McLaren or Ferrari to collaborate on a new hatchback – or autonomous driving technology. All the focus is on producing a supercar without any pressure to find synergies that share components or optimised clustering costs. For BMW, as a car company that sells a broad portfolio of models and volumes in excess of 3 million units a year – the sacrifice to produce a supercar could be very risky. 


BMW's most successful supercar venture to date: the V12 motor that powered the McLaren F1.

Supercars are a low-volume game, with terrible economies of scale, which is why mainstream brands face huge risks with any supercar projects (it was reported a few years ago that Volkswagen (Bugatti's parent company) lost money on each and every Veyron sold). Custom componentry requires delicate planning. You must own all the risk and become your own supply chain. And if you share components from within your larger product parts-bin, there is the risk that customers and the market will question the authenticity of your supercar (when it finally goes on sale). 

Nobody questions McLaren or Ferrari for producing only supercars, because there is never an expectation for the Woking- and Maranello-based brands to do anything else. In a world where analysts and governments want to see autonomous tech and electric vehicles from manufacturers who produce in excess of 100 000 units a year, is a supercar project really that appropriate for a 3 million vehicle-per-annum brand such as BMW?

Supercars and a share price slide

If Mercedes-Benz identifies a performance car profit opportunity surrounded by all the risks associated with low-volume production, it can simply task its (now wholly owned) AMG division to execute. And for every action of Mercedes-Benz (and by implication Mercedes-AMG), there be an equal and opposite reaction from BMW – and vice versa. 

Mercedes-AMG’s One hypercar is a very ambitious project. BMW feels it must now do the same with the Vision M Next supercar. But the automotive realm is changing, rapidly. Over the last 5 years, Mercedes-Benz and BMW have seen their share prices halve as the cost of developing technologies to meet changing consumer demands have drained their finances. BMW announced a profit warning in May, after announcing its first loss in a decade. 


Is a supercar likely to improve profits and share prices?

On 13 March 2013, both companies saw share price peaks. For BMW, it was €119.95. Mercedes-Benz topped-out on the same day, at €93.10. This week, those same shares are worth 44- and 48% less. If we imagine that most automotive design projects run on a 5-year development horizon, what appeared affordable in 2013, is suddenly a potential debt burden in 2019. 

BMW’s supercar concept has previewed many futuristic technologies, but the risk of making those a reality – will burden the company's design and engineering teams. Some of the technologies are very clever, such as the head-up display, which projects idea cornering lines and braking points. This is also technology which could prove litigious if driver’s make an error of judgement and crash. And the Vision M Next’s facial recognition technology? Perhaps that's not quite as necessary. 

For BMW, the Vision M Next won’t be easy to bring to market. If it contains too much common componentry from series-production BMWs, it will be dismissed as derivative. If BMW dedicates too many engineering resources to make it a custom platform with unique trimmings, the input costs soar and potential profit margin shrinks – which will have shareholders asking questions. 

Another issue is its actual positioning. Can BMW expect to sell a car at mid-engined supercar prices to rival McLaren, Lamborghini or Ferrari? Its current most expensive sportscar is the new M8, which at R3 million, is still priced some distance below a new Lamborghini Huracán or Ferrari 488. Will there be demand if BMW positions the Vision M Next supercar to compete directly with Italian and British rivals? 


BMW has a habit of pulling out of supercar projects well into the process.

Supercar pricing power increases proportional to exclusivity and there is a thread of logic which says that nobody will pay true supercar money for a vehicle which shares its badge with a hatchback… 

There is also a unique continuation trap with supercars. Once you do one, the pressure is always to do another. Staff seconded to the Vision M Next project must jealously regard the immense success McLaren has had with reviving its road car division, effectively leveraging off the F1’s legendary status – a vehicle which would have been impossible without BMW’s V12 engine involvement. 

Adding to the pressure is BMW having to decide on replacing its CEO within this month. The Vision M Next project could either be a phoenix or Icarus moment for the brand's supercar ambitions. 

Other interesting content

BMW M1 Procar: SentiMETAL Stories

Classic Drive: BMW 325iS "Gusheshe" & 333i

BMW 530 MLE: Restoration of an SA icon

Mid Month Fuel Price Outlook

A stronger rand and oil price has a mixed effect on presumed fuel prices for August.

The Rand has firmed to the Dollar over the first half of July but the global oil price has increased of late. Concern over oil stocks and more than usual political instability in the Middle East has pushed the price of ‘black gold’ upwards of $67 (Brent Crude). 

The result is split depending on whether you fill with diesel or petrol. Diesel is set to decrease by 20 cents while petrol could increase by 7 cents a litre.

The AA makes these predictions at the half-way mark of the month, but are not a dead certainty as both prices could deviate further before month end. We will update you later on this month when the outlook is confirmed.

Related Content

Fuel Price Breakdown: What do you pay for?

5 Ways to Beat the Fuel Price Hike

Most Fuel Efficient Budget Cars in SA

Most Fuel-Efficient Double-Cab Bakkies in SA

5 Fuel-Saving Car Features & How They Work

Most Fuel Efficient Budget Cars in SA

Most Fuel Efficient Diesel Cars in SA (2018)

Most Fuel Efficient Petrol Cars in SA (2018)

10 Ways To Save Fuel

Toyota Supra (2019) Price in South Africa

The Toyota Supra launches this week and we have pricing. Here's how much the Japanese sportscar will cost.

Under that curvy and striking body is a 3.0-litre twin-scroll turbocharged 6-cylinder motor. It produces 250 kW and 495 Nm. Power goes to the rear wheels via an 8-speed automatic transmission and Toyota claims that it's offering will hit 100 kph in just 4.1 seconds. 

It's the under-the-skin details which have us interested. Toyota is claiming a 50/50 weight distribution, high structural rigidity, and a low center of gravity which should make for an entertaining drive. While the platform is shared with BMW, Toyota tuned the spring and shock absorber settings for the new double-joint spring strut front suspension and multi-link rear suspension. Toyota also set specific parameters for the Supra's stability control system performance. Adaptive Variable Suspension is standard and features 2 modes: Normal and Sport. There is also an active differential.

Toyota is marketing its new Supra as a premium Grand Tourer and there will be considerable premium features fitted like Keyless Smart Entry, dual automatic climate control, auto-dimming rearview mirrors, rear camera, rain sensor windshield wipers, garage door opener, power folding mirrors, and a leather-wrapped steering wheel will be standard. There will be a high-end multimedia setup, satellite navigation, Apple CarPlay as well as a JBL audio system, but we're going to wait for official local confirmation to see what SA-spec Supras will receive in terms of tech.

We'll be driving the Toyota Supra in SA this week, and we'll have final confirmation of specification and features then, as well as a launch review.

Toyota Supra Price in South Africa

Toyota GR Supra Track                   R953 000

Toyota GR Supra                             R1 072 300

Toyota Supra Matte Grey edition     R1 092 300

H/T to Zero2Turbo

Further Reading

Read the incredible story of how BMW and Toyota worked together 

How Toyota revived the Supra

Toyota Supra (2019) International Prototype Drive

BMW Z4 M40i (2019) International Launch Review

BMW Boosts X7 Tow Rating

Slight rear-end redesign enables big-rig hauling capability for BMW

Engineers have added a great deal more credibility to the ‘utility’ aspect of BMW’s SUVs, by announcing a 30% increase in towing capacity for the brand’s luxury gravel travel vehicles.

All three of BMW’s new large SUVs – X5, X6 and X7 – have been technically reinforced to meet Australia’s increasingly stringent design rule requirements.

Some of the most stringent homologation requirements in the world are found in the Australian automotive market. BMW realised that its hugely powerful engines available in the X5, X6 and X7 were being underutilised by customers who wanted to tow horseboxes or watercraft.

Responding to the Australian towing regulation challenge was not a momentary decision. Engineers at BMW have been working for nearly five years to find a solution for boosting the tow-capacity of its CLAR platform SUVs.

Customers Down Under will now have the choice to option a strengthened aft section for their X5, X6 or X7, which supports a tow ball and wiring harness unique to the design. The entire upgrade increases tow capacity from 2.7t to 3.5t and positions BMW’s large SUVs as serious heavy hauling alternatives to some very robust legacy off-road SUVs.

Other vehicles which feature 3.5t towing capacity are Toyota’s Land Cruiser 200 and Range Rover’s Vogue, both of which are traditional luxury SUVs with proven off-road exploration pedigree and low-range gearing.

Although the upgraded tow-capacity X5, X6 and X7 are only being launch for the Australian market at first, it would make a very appropriate South African product evolution too – consider the similar road conditions and towing requirements of customers in both markets. And of course, the convergences in both markets being right-hand drive.

Related content

Five Times Carmakers Over-customised Cars for Hobbies

Namibian Road Trip with a BMW X3 xDrive30d

Mazda CX-30 (2019) International Launch Review

Mazda has launched the 5th member of its global SUV range, the CX-30, in Europe. The strangely-named newcomer, which squeezes between the Hiroshima-based firm's existing CX-3 and CX-5 models, will be launched in South Africa during the 1st quarter of 2020. Is it worth waiting for? Let's find out… 

One could argue that the only thing that doesn’t make sense about Mazda’s new CX-30 is its name. SUVs are selling in droves globally, city-SUVs (or crossovers) are all the rage and Mazda finds itself on more shopping lists thanks to its development of additional family-friendly high riders.

The move to expand Mazda’s SUV line-up to 5 models is quite logical, but why didn't the brand name this in-betweener the CX-4, given its size, expected price point and position in the product line-up? Well, it turns out Mazda already sells a "CX-4" in China, and didn’t want to double up.

Own a Mazda? Tell us about your experience here


Black cladding appends the CX-30's crossover looks. It's longer and more spacious than a CX-3, but it's no taller than its smaller sibling.

Three’s company

Naming conventions aside, the vehicle the CX-30 has most in common with is the Mazda3, which will be introduced in Mzansi shortly. The CX-30 shares the compact hatchback’s platform, suspension, electronic architecture and powerplants.

Under the body, the newcomer features a MacPherson strut front and torsion beam rear configuration – borrowed from the Mazda3, but tweaked for this high-riding application. Equally, the CX-30’s wheelbase is 70 mm shorter, while it gives best 65 mm in total length, at a pinch under 4.4 metres.


A narrow side glass area, defined bonnet lines and chrome-accented slimline headlamps add distinctiveness to the CX-30.

At the same time, the newcomer differentiates itself substantially from the CX-3 and CX-5: it is 120 mm longer than (but just as tall as) the former, and 150 mm shorter than the latter. It stands 1 795-mm wide and its wheelbase is 85 mm longer than the former and 45 mm shorter than the latter.

In South Africa, it's likely that the CX-30 will be offered with 1.5-litre- and 2.0-litre four-cylinder naturally aspirated petrol engines. Test cars at the CX-30’s launch sent drive to their front wheels via 6-speed manual or 6-speed automatic transmissions; we expect automatic versions to sell best.


The CX-30's rear aspect is sporty, replete with an integrated tailgate spoiler, sculpted taillight clusters and side-mounted exhaust tips. 

None of those aforementioned engines was available at the global launch, so we’ll reserve judgement on those until a more thorough local drive. 

So, what’s it like to drive?

Based on our first impression, the CX-30 bears all the hallmarks of a typical city-SUV. It’s light, nippy and easy to manoeuvre through the various tight, undulating streets, and is an easy car to navigate through intersections despite. The only anomaly in terms of navigating foreign roads is a partially obscured rear view: the newcomer’s raked roofline, narrow rear window and bulky C-pillar combine to block out much of your rear vision.


There is a price to pay for those low-slung looks and chunky C-pillars: rearward visibility out of the CX-30 is less than ideal. 

However, decent-sized side mirrors, a reverse-view camera and strong forward visibility help to offset this. Otherwise, the steering is light at low speeds, while the body feels well controlled (if a tad firm) over bumps – we believe the latter trait is owed, in part, to the 18-inch wheels.

The CX-30 is not just a city slicker, however. Its broader footprint (widened track, compared with the CX-3) endows it with genuine long-journey pretensions that are not all that removed from the larger CX-5. The suspension shakes off longer, drawn-out dips in the road with aplomb, and the CX-30 gently navigates bends with confidence. Indeed, a cross-country South African adventure would not be out of the question at all…


Although the newcomer's suspension is tuned for sporty handling, it rides acceptably well over poorer surfaces.

As with any new Mazda, the ride and handling tuning (ostensibly for the European market, in this case) naturally subscribes to a sporty brief. As a consequence, the CX-30 feels comfortable and competent when pushed through a corner. In these conditions, the steering, for example, imparts excellent weighting, feel and feedback, while the kerb weight (approximately 1 400 kg) feels well-controlled through fast changes in directions.

Refinement plus

Mazda has made huge in-roads with its noise and vibration levels in its cars in the past few years. Whereas earlier versions of Mazda3 cabins were filled with tyre roar, particularly on coarse asphalt, the newer model and its latest-generation siblings have climbed to class benchmark levels.


As is the case with the new Mazda3, the CX-30 has a sporty driving position and well-made cabin with quality finishes.

The CX-30 only reinforces this theme, such is the quietness and refinement of the newcomer's cabin. At highway speeds, the cabin is serene and devoid of squeaks or rattles – merely bolstering the car’s quasi-CX-5 open road characteristics.

Mazda reps claim that much of the CX-30’s 50 kg weight penalty over the Mazda3 is contributed by added sound insulation. We believe them.

The car’s on-road polish is supported by another quality interior layout replete with excellent materials and craftsmanship, and quality finishes. In European trims, there are soft-touch materials at the various contact points, supported by clear driver instrumentation and a swish centrally-mounted infotainment screen accessed via touch and rotary dial features.


Rear legroom is appreciably better than in the CX-3; note the narrow side glass area, which limits outward visibility.

The CX-30 is further endowed with "human-centric seats", Mazda claims. The Japanese marque says it has put a lot of focus into the positioning and shape of the front pews, so as to follow the natural S-curve of the human spine. The CX-30’s seat hip point – the one in which you pivot into the vehicle – is also elevated 45 mm from the Mazda3, which the larger framed and more seasoned among us will undoubtedly appreciate.

Is it family-friendly?

That will depend entirely on the size and age of the family, but yes, the CX-30 does have some family-friendly attributes. Mazda proudly proclaims the CX-30 as being able to accommodate a quartet of adults, by virtue of better-than-expected aft leg room, rear air vents and adequate head and shoulder room. The fitment of a flip-down armrest and bottle-friendly door pockets are noted inclusions at this end of the market, too.


With 430 litres of luggage space available, the CX-30 does justice to its "in-betweener" compact SUV/crossover billing.

The fitment of child anchorage points on the outer rear seats (with ISOfix attachments) reinforces the car’s family-carrying attributes, along with a 60:40 folding function. However, some parents may take issue with the car’s high-set window line, which impinges on outward visibility for aft occupants. Similarly, the car’s 430-litre load bay will be adequate for many families, but those with 2 prams might find the compromise too big.

Summary

Based on our first impression, this is another stellar effort from Mazda, and subscribes to the well-worn SUV theory of "if you build it, they’ll come". Like the Haval H2, Hyundai Creta and, to an extent, Nissan Qashqai, the CX-30 straddles the compact family car (Ford Ecosport, Renault Duster, Suzuki Vitara and Volkswagen T-Cross) and family car (Peugeot 3008, Toyota RAV5, Volkswagen Tiguan et al.) segments virtue of its in-between size. Either way, Mazda CX-30 is a name you’ll soon remember – and likely for all the right reasons. In fact, depending on its yet-to-be-confirmed price point, it might ultimately prove more popular than the car (Mazda3) it's based on in South Africa – as scandalous as that may sound.

Related content:

Volkswagen T-Cross (2019) Local Specs & Price

Mahindra XUV300 1.5TD W8 (2019) Review

Haval H2 1.5T Luxury Auto (2017) Review [with Video]

Nissan Announces 7 Speeds for Qashqai