Ford Everest 3.0 TDCI XLT 4×4 (2009) Driving Impression
Given South Africans’ love of all things outdoors, the success of the double-cab pick-up in this market is very easy to understand. Similarly, the desirability of a bakkie-based SUV seems pretty much a given, especially given the success of vehicles such as the Isuzu Frontier and locally developed Nissan Sani in the past.
However, it has only really been Toyota that has been quick to cash in on this genre with its Fortuner, a vehicle that has been a phenomenal success from the word go. But the competition is catching up… Mitsubishi has launched a Triton-based competitor (the Pajero Sport), and now Ford has launched its Ranger-based Everest. Sporting attractive pricing, can the latter spoil the Toyota’s party?
Old-fashioned design
The Ford Everest 3.0 TDCi XLT 4×4 is clearly of an older design than the Fortuner, looking more like a station wagon version of a Ranger double-cab. By contrast the Fortuner’s looks are better integrated. That said, the Everest is not unattractive, and certainly imposing. It is a very long vehicle, made even longer by the fitment of a spare wheel on the tailgate. With a 255 mm ground clearance and riding on striking 17-inch alloy wheels, the Everest has lots of presence.
The big body translates into a very spacious cabin, bigger even than the Fortuner’s. Unlike the Toyota, which features two fold-up rear seats that impinge badly on luggage space, the Everest has a solid bench, which can be easily removed, something that can’t be easily done with the Toyota’s individual rear seats. That’s just as important as the fact that rear legroom for third-row passengers is impressive.
Of course, with the rear seats occupied, the boot space is limited… more so than in the Fortuner. The good news continues in the second row… legroom here is excellent, too. That makes the Everest a really spacious and practical family hold-all, because it seats five passengers very comfortably, allowing for the rear bench to be removed, which in turn frees up massive luggage space. So far, so good.
Unfortunately, matters turn decidedly pear shaped in the front of the cabin… Facing the driver is a dashboard that comes straight from the Ranger. This is not an altogether bad thing, as it looks suitably upmarket and modern enough. But spend more than a couple of minutes behind the wheel and some irritations come to light.
For example, the driving position is rather flawed, because the seat lacks height-adjustment and the steering wheel can’t be moved telescopically. The problem is compounded by a high floor, which results in a somewhat unnatural seating position (high knees). It is possible to get used to this seating position, but it is certainly not ideal.
Also showing the Everest’s “technological” age is the fitment of a handbrake lever in the traditional, old-fashioned bakkie-position below the facia rather than the more modern “pull-up” type on the centre console floor. And the controls for the ventilation system are of the old-fashioned rotary knob type, too.
Build quality is good, though, and there’s a disarming lack of pretence about the Everest’s cabin that can be refreshing. But the choice of light beige upholstery for what is likely to be a family vehicle that will often see a dirt road is simply not ideal. At least the carpets are black.
Strong go
Powered by the same, refined, 3.0-litre turbodiesel engine that does duty so effectively in the Ranger, the Ford Everest 3.0 TDCI XLT 4×4 has 115 kW and 380 Nm of torque at its disposal, figures that compare well with the Toyota and others. With a weight of two tonnes, the Everest is never going to be a brisk sprinter, but generally the performance is satisfactory, especially as speeds rise, when both the overtaking power and refinement really come to the fore. It is also relatively economical, with a consumption figure of below 10 litres/100 km for such a big vehicle being more than acceptable.
Clearly then, the engine is not to blame for the cumbersome on-road dynamics. Rather, a quick glance at the specification sheet will identify the two major culprits… Firstly, the Everest uses a solid axle at the rear with leaf springs (as in a bakkie), and the steering is of the outdated recirculating ball and nut type. Consequently the Everest’s steering is very vague and slow, while the body movements are poorly controlled. Ride comfort in a straight line is acceptable, but corners soon upset its composure, as does a deterioration in the quality of the road surface.
It is significantly better off the beaten track. Here the long-travel suspension, high ground clearance and good low-down grunt make it a capable adventure machine, mostly because the speeds are lower.
The Everest’s five-speed manual transmission sends power to the rear wheels, but a separate lever on the centre console allows for four-wheel drive selection (high and low range). Sadly, there’s no diff-lock, but an electronic limited slip differential is fitted. Overall, the Everest is likely as good off-road as most owners will need it to be.
Verdict
Although the Everest is a fair bit cheaper than a Fortuner, the Toyota remains worthy of the extra cash not only due to its higher features count, but also because it is the better, more refined vehicle overall. The Fortuner has been criticised in the past for its poor dynamic stability, but it feels significantly more stable on the road than the Everest. And remember the Toyota now also features electronic stability control, a spec item the Ford lacks. In conclusion then, the Ford looks and feels like an older-generation product compared with its rivals. Consequently, it faces a tough challenge.
We like:
Massive cabin, with true seven-seat capability
Refined, powerful engine
We don’t like:
Dated facia
Impractical upholstery
Driving position
Wallowy ride
Lack of safety features
Fast facts
Engine: 3.0-litre, four-cylinder, turbodiesel
Power: 115 kW @ 3 200 rpm
Torque: 380 Nm @ 1 800 rpm
Transmission: five-speed automatic
Wheels: 16-inch alloy
Top speed: 166 km/h
0-100 km/h: N/A seconds
Fuel economy: <10 litres/100 km
Also consider:
Toyota Fortuner 3.0 D-4D 4×4:
Massively popular for obvious reasons – it boasts the proven underpinnings of the Hilux, but adds an attractive SUV body, seven seats and a good specification level. When stowed the rearmost seats impinge on luggage room, and they can’t be easily removed.
Chevrolet Captiva 2.0 VCDi LTZ:
A smaller vehicle, but a seven-seater nonetheless. The Captiva is really a slightly bigger crossover, and consequently its unibody construction gives it better refinement. The cabin is more car-like, too. On the downside, it is not as off-road capable as the Ford and Toyota.
Kia Sorento 2.2 4×4 7-seat:
This attractive unibody offering is similarly priced and boasts significantly higher levels of refinement as well as superb performance and on-road comfort. Of course, it also can’t match the off-road ability of the Toyota and Ford.