Why you don’t need a double-cab 4×4 with low range
There’s guessing – and there’s knowing. And in a world of measurable and trackable everything, we know much more. And guess a lot less. Or at least, we should. And when in doubt, there’s always the ChatGPT option…
Double-cab bakkies are very expensive, but they remain in terrific demand. It is a market reality that, in our country, the traditional luxury sedan market has been conquested by double-cabs. Whereas the majority of South African upper-middle-class family car buyers bought a BMW 3 Series or Mercedes-Benz C-Class in the early 2000s, their vehicle asset of choice is now a Toyota Hilux or Ford Ranger.
This migration of luxury sedan buyers into double-cab bakkies has its consequences, because wealthy South Africans still live in the suburbs… okay, okay, the overwhelming majority of them do. They don’t live on farms. And double-cab bakkies, despite their leather-trimmed cabins festooned with big infotainment touchscreens, are fundamentally designed to work on farms. Not suburbs. Especially the 4×4 versions.
This is where the question of guessing or knowing applies. Why would you buy a vehicle specification with an expensive feature that you’ll never use? And the double-cab 4×4 bakkie is exactly that. Why? Because it has a low-range transfer case, which is rarely engaged – often, never.
Very few double-cab 4x4s ever go ‘4L’
There are double-cab bakkie owners who live in the suburbs and occasionally journey into Botswana, Mozambique, Lesotho, Namibia or Zambia. They’ll use low-range gearing (4L) for a few driving hours on those adventure vacations. But they are in the minority.
In truth, many Hilux or Ranger double-cab 4×4 owners rarely engage low-range. And that’s such a waste, because they’ve paid for an effectively redundant mechanical feature that defines their vehicle choices. It begs the question: are most double-cab 4x4s surplus to requirements?
“No, they aren’t, because driving in 4×4 is much safer than 4×2, on dirt roads.” That’s true, in principle, but the theory around 4×4 traction and dirt road driving safety has changed significantly in the last 10 or so years. Why? Electronic stability control has become a standard feature in most double-cab bakkies.
Double-cab 4x2s have become much safer on dirt roads
I’ve done a lot of dirt road driving – over the worst corrugations imaginable. And I’ve rounded dirt road corners, where wind-blown sand ridges frame the apex. And yes, I always engage 4H on these journeys, believing the slight four-wheel-drive understeer bias will keep the rear axle from getting too wayward.
But there’s a caveat. All my dirt road journeys in the late 2000s and early 2010s, were in 4×4 bakkies without electronic stability control (ESP). The only traction enhancement and stability guardianship at my disposal was mechanical – by engaging 4H.
In the current market, all American and Japanese double-cab bakkies on sale in South Africa feature ESP. And that makes 4×4 traction and tracking stability, less of an absolute benefit for safer dirt-road driving. Framed differently: which is the safer vehicle to drive on an unscraped dirt road? A legacy double-cab 4×4 without ESP and 4H engaged, or a newer double-cab 4×2, with ESP on? It’s a tricky question.
Low-range is overkill for 99% of your driving experience
If ESP makes a double-cab 4×2 much safer on tricky dirt roads, why bother with the 4×4? Especially if you’ll never use the low-range (4L) of that 2-speed transfer case? This is important. I am not disputing the absolute utility of 4H, but I am casting doubt on the value of 4L for most double-cab 4×4 owners.
The double-cab bakkie is not going to revert to farm life. These vehicles will continue proliferating in the ownership profile of urban buyers, as family vehicles. And if you can save money by not buying a 4×4 configuration you’ll never use, why wouldn’t you? Why should you pay for 4L, if you only need 4H?
“But I want 4×4 traction, for sand driving and accessing a remote Airbnb cabin, atop a climb with cross-axle terrain?” Okay. Sure. Volkswagen’s first Amarok proved you don’t need low-range gearing for that. Just an automatic transmission with a really short 1st gear, lots of engine power and a lockable rear diff.
Bakkies are coming to market with more powerful engines, which solves part of that equation. Automatic transmissions are gaining gears, not losing them. And rear differential locks are now near-ubiquitous.
You’ll probably never use low-range
The kind of terrain that requires 4L isn’t something your family will enjoy exploring while seated in a double-cab bakkie. Trust us. Every time you venture into low-range 4×4 terrain, the risk of cosmetic vehicle damage is huge. Have you priced a new bumper or fender on a R900 000 double-cab? Quite.
Dirt-road travelling is a lived reality for the South African driving experience. Unlike many other global bakkie markets, South Africans journey on dirt roads for adventure, not only utility. Unless you drive on dirt roads weekly, they can be tricky to traverse.
Any assistance system that helps a driver operate safer on dirt roads is valuable. But the question is which configuration of double-cab, contextual of price, is the best solution? Because it could be a drivetrain hybrid between the current 4×4 and 4×2 double-cabs.
A double-cab 4×4 with ESP engaged and running in 4H is the safest dirt-road-journeying vehicle of its type. But you still carry the cost, complexity and weight of a transfer case with low-range, which you probably don’t need and might never use. Is there a market for double-cab bakkies with only 4H?
VW had the right idea
When you compare bakkies in the R900 000 to R1-million pricing spectrum, the difference between a 4×2 and 4×4 double-cab (of similar trim and specification) is about R50 000. That difference in pricing equates to about a year’s diesel double-cab running costs.
Wealthy buyers are often strangely price-sensitive when they feel shortchanged by unrealised value. Yet it’s strange how they keep absorbing the opportunity cost of paying for a mechanical feature they don’t want (or need) when buying a double-cab 4×4.
Many would prefer a double-cab 4×4 with only 4H. There’s no guessing: we know that is the most appropriate South African double-cab bakkie configuration for most buyers. Volkwagen’s previous-generation Amarok 3.0 V6 TDI proved this to be fact.
The question is: Which current bakkie model range might offer a 4H-only double-cab 4×4 again?
Related content:
What bakkie might Stellantis build in SA?
Green hydrogen could save South Africa’s car industry
Why no more Akio Toyoda at Toyota?
Why Tank 300 matters so much for GWM