Lamborghini Huracan STO vs Ferrari SF90 Spider: Classic Comparison
They come from a similar past, but step into the ring from opposite sides. We take the stripped-out, old-school Lamborghini Huracan STO for a drive to see how it compares with the more sophisticated, electrically assisted Ferrari SF90 Spider.
The crisp air accentuates the unmistakably piercing sound of a Lamborghini Huracan STO approaching, especially as there is little traffic in Franschhoek this early in the morning. While still revelling in the aural delight the STO provides, it dazzles me as it appears around the corner; its bright colours perfectly befit the din it creates. Moments later, the much smoother-sounding Ferrari SF90 Spider approaches.
For a moment, the Ferrari SF90 Spider might look understated compared with the sharp and angular Lamborghini Huracan STO, but its outright performance numbers will settle any bar fight.
Both Ferrari and Lamborghini’s roots lie in V12 engines – V12s powered Enzo Ferrari’s road and race cars, while Ferruccio Lamborghini commissioned engineering firm Societa Autostart to design a V12, which would carry the name of its chief architect, (Giotto) Bizzarrini, to power his firm’s first car, the 350GT.
Ferrari has stuck with this concept throughout its history, and so has Lamborghini. However, in the era of “downsizing for efficiency”, both companies now favour smaller, but still very high-performance engines.
The more outrageous of these 2 Italian exotics is undoubtedly the Huracan. Stripped out to the bare minimum (for a road car) and laced with performance-optimising tweaks, the STO is the pinnacle of the Sant’Agata firm’s super- (as opposed to hypercar) development since it launched the Gallardo in 2003.
On the opposite side of the ring, Ferrari offers a different concept. In the shape of the SF90 (here in Spider form), we have a smaller-capacity turbocharged engine: a 4.0-litre V8 assisted by a complex hybrid system consisting of no fewer than 3 electric motors.
These add-ons boost the performance of the Ferrari SF90 to a monumental 735 kW and 800 Nm of torque; the Lamborghini Huracan STO offers 470 kW and 565 Nm, but it’s notably lighter than the silver Prancing Horse. This begs the question, just how different are these machines to drive?
Lamborghini‘s commitment to weight saving in the Huracan is very impressive. Take, for example, the engine cover. In true race car fashion, you unclip this louvred carbon-fibre part and completely remove it from the car. There are no hinges or fancy releases.
Specifications:
- Model: Lamborghini Huracan STO
- Engine: 5.2-litre, V10, petrol
- Power: 470 kW at 8 000 rpm
- Torque: 565 Nm at 6 500 rpm
- Gearbox: 4-speed automatic, RWD
- Weight: 1 339 kg
- 0-100 kph: 3.0 sec (claimed)
- Top speed: 310 kph (claimed)
It has a large rear wing, while the rest of the rear has undoubtedly been designed to allow as much airflow to cool the engine as possible and offer the necessary aerodynamic benefits. There is a lot of visual drama going on here; even when you just walk around the car, the STO looks, well, outrageous.
Needless to say, there is no mistaking the STO for anything other than a full-fat supercar, the aggressive design putting any doubts to bed.
The SF90 Spider is completely different. Sure, based on its appearance, the Ferrari looks as powerful and rapid as it is, but the SF90 has a much classier and sophisticated aura – dare I say, most Ferraris do.
The flowing lines on the front wing focus the eye on the lower part of the nose, while the rear, with its 2 exhaust ends, is pure, but subtle, supercar. However, the gorgeous body hides hypercar performance.
As we lift the small engine cover (remember, this is the Spider variant), I am immediately impressed by how low the latest development of the F154 (FA) engine sits in the Ferrari’s bay. It is positioned quite low in the car, which allows the turbocharger plumbing and hybrid system to also be visible.
Peering along the side of the Ferrari SF90, the overall smoothness of the design continues. Even the side air intakes seem quite ordinary and simply flow into the side sculpting of the body work.
Specifications
- Model: Ferrari SF90 Spider
- Engine: 4.0-litre V8, turbo petrol + 3 electric motors
- Power: 574 kW at 7 500 rpm (+ 162 kW e-boost)
- Torque: 800 Nm at 6 000 rpm
- Gearbox: 8-speed auto, RWD
- Weight: 1 670 kg
- 0-100 kph: 2.5 sec (claimed)
- Top speed: 340 kph (claimed)
The manic colour scheme of the Lamborghini undoubtedly draws your eyes towards it, and while the silver colour of the Ferrari is more mundane, it is also classier.
Behind the wheel of the Ferrari SF90
As I slide into the Ferrari‘s driver’s seat, the Maranello marque’s modern and sophisticated approach is obvious. The cabin is luxuriously trimmed in leather and carbon fibre (even the fire extinguisher has a leather cover) – the high-end approach to the cabin clearly in line with the contemporary drivetrain.
Most impressive is the large digital instrument cluster. It would take a while to become familiar with all the functions and settings, but there is no time for that – I want to experience the full performance on offer.
I accelerate down the road and short-shift into 2nd gear. I decide not to hold back and lean firmly on the accelerator pedal, pressing it almost all the way down to the base of the footwell. With a complete absence of fanfare, the unruffled SF90 accelerates down the short stretch of tarmac with such a high level of performance that it catches me by surprise… even though I was fully expecting it to be quick.
The turbocharged V8, aided by that trio of motors, generates a sheer groundswell of torque that the all-wheel-drive system (somehow) transfers to terra firma in a manner I have not felt in any other supercar.
I’ve spent some time in the mild-hybrid LaFerrari, and in that car, its V12 utterly dominates proceedings. In the SF90, the combination of torque feels more balanced in the sense that, yes, the engine is certainly still the star performer, but the turbos and electric motors make for an especially strong supporting cast.
Threading this beauty through the first couple of corners confirms what I expected – the grip levels are high and the car handles predictably. Although this is a mostly smooth road, I immediately sense the ride quality is spot on, complementing the high levels of general comfort and impressive sound deadening.
Compared to the STO’s V10 cacophony, the Ferrari engine sounds, dare I say it, a little subdued. Having said that, it doesn’t take long to conclude that the Ferrari SF90 Spider is a superbly balanced package.
I park the Ferrari SF90 and walk over to the Lamborghini Huracan STO (abbreviation for Super Trofeo Omologato). The intensity of the Lamborghini continues when you climb into its cockpit. The seats are firm and very supportive. There are no carpets; only small patches of rubber underneath my feet.
The rest of the Lamborghini Huracan STO’s cabin is mostly clad in carbon fibre (much more so than in the Ferrari SF90) as well as Alcantara, while the focused nature of the car is again highlighted by the small roll bars behind the seats – something Ferrari seems to stay away from in its road cars.
What the Huracan STO is like to pilot
Press the start button and the engine barks into life like only a naturally aspirated engine can. Although I only had a few precious moments in the STO, memories of my time with the Performante came flooding back. This car is the Performante, BUT on steroids. In front of you is a digital display with an arch across it that highlights the rev range at the top – another indication of where the focus of this car lies.
Even when “taking it easy”, you experience the STO’s raw intensity from the moment you pull away. As with most mid-engined cars, you sit close to the nose with a near-perfect view through the windscreen.
Even when you short-shift, there is more than enough torque available for you to get a sensation of what that shrieking V10 can deliver, but the car creates so much such theatre that you can’t help but rev halfway to 9 000 rpm at every opportunity, no matter how laid-back you may be feeling at the time.
Suffice it to say, the engine revs freely around the clock, with gearchanges (through the 7-speed dual-clutch transmission) being slick and quick – quite unlike that of the previous-gen Superleggera.
Having driven several sports- and supercars on the Franschhoek Pass, it quickly becomes quite apparent that the STO’s electronically controlled magneto-rheologic suspension soaks up road irregularities better than the hardcore 991.2-series Porsche GT3 RS. The exceedingly firm bucket seats keep you in place, and they contribute to an incredibly close physical connection you soon develop with the car.
The addictive howl in the cabin from the high-revving 5.2-litre, V10 engine further contributes to your connection with the car. The exhaust pops and bangs from the high-mounted, centre exhaust ports, which reverberate off the cliffs, scaring a few birds (and other wildlife) away in the process.
I believe that, with familiarisation, I could learn to trust the STO more through very fast sweeps, partly thanks to how much downforce it generates. There are very few cars that demand the same level of concentration and offer the same kind of thrills as a superbike, but the STO comes tantalisingly close.
Verdict
The Lamborghini Huracan STO left me yearning for more time behind its ‘wheel. Indeed, few vehicles I’ve sampled over the past 16 years have managed to deliver the dynamic thrills I experienced in that car.
The Lamborghini Huracan STO may not offer the same degree of everyday usability as the Ferrari SF90, but from the pure adrenaline rush I experienced behind the wheel to the bold exterior design and the excitement its soundtrack elicits from every single person who hears it, the Lambo sits in a league of its own. It serves up an intense and undiluted driving experience that draws you back, time and again…
On the other hand, the Ferrari SF90’s outright, more sophisticated performance leaves one impressed by what can be achieved nowadays by employing high levels of technology; believe me, you will be less tired after a 5-hour drive in it compared to the Lamborghini Huracan STO – and so will your passenger!
In a way, the SF90 is also relatively discreet, which will increase its appeal for some prospective owners. After all, even if you order the STO in very humdrum colours, it will still grab attention wherever it goes.
Although both cars offer top levels of performance in each of their respective “categories”, the 2 Italian supercars’ approaches are now rather different. Whereas the Ferrari SF90 (probably) indicates the way forward for the supercar genre, the Lamborghini Huracan STO clearly shows what we’ll be missing.
Find a new/used Lamborghini listed for sale on Cars.co.za
Find a new/used Ferrari listed for sale on Cars.co.za
Related content:
Lamborghini Diablo vs Ferrari F512 M: Classic Comparison
Ciro drives a Lamborghini Diablo at Zwartkops
Ferrari 365 GTB/4 Daytona vs Lamborghini Miura P400S: Classic Comparison
Lamborghini Miura: Meet the SA man who owned 2 of them!
Ferrari 458 Speciale vs 488 Pista: Classic Comparison