Ferrari GTC4Lusso Introduced

 

Ferrari has introduced a new four-seater to its range and it boasts integrated rear-wheel steering and four-wheel drive for the first time.

Ferrari will showcase its latest addition, the GTC4Lusso at the upcoming Geneva Motor Show. Using the concept of the Grand Tourer as a base, the GTC4Lusso combines rear-wheel steering and four-wheel drive for the first time, ushering in higher levels of versatility and usability. The name itself makes reference to previous Ferarris such as the 330 GTC, 330 GT and 250 GT Berlinetta Lusso while the ‘4’ refers to the four seats offered in the GTC4Lusso.

Engine Power

The Ferarri GTC4Lusso is powered by a 6.3-litre V12 engine that develops 507 kW and 697 Nm of torque. The GTC4Lusso is capable of achieving 0-100 kph in 3.4 seconds before reaching a top speed of 335 kph.

Thanks to its 4RM Evo four-wheel drive system and rear-wheel steering combination, the GTC4Lusso can be driven with confidence in a wide range of situations. The combination allows for increased control and stability in wet, snow and low-grip conditions. The new patented system is known as 4RM-S and is an evolution of Ferrari’s Slip Slide Control 4.0 and incorporates the electronic differential and SCM-E dampers which, further improves performance on rough surfaces while also enhancing ride comfort.

Performance enhancing elements such as the new front grille with integrated air intakes, air vents, roof mounted spoiler and a new triple-fence diffuser have made the GTC4Lusso even more aerodynamic than the Ferrari FF.

Interior Features

The GTC4Lusso features a ‘Dual Cockpit’ design which Ferrari says “enhances the shared driving experience for both driver and passenger, with the latter having its own generous optional display with a plethora of functions.” That aside, the GTC4Lusso features a bespoke handcrafted interior that includes four wraparound seats.

The GTC4Lusso will also show a new infotainment platform for the first time which utilises a 10.25-inch high-definition screen with capacitive touch technology. The steering wheel is more compact due to housing a smaller airbag and it features integrated controls.

What do you think of the new Ferarri GTC4Lusso? Share your comments with us in the section below. 

Jaguar XF (2016) Specs & Price

The new Jaguar XF has arrived in SA and is currently being launched to the media. The new XF brings the mid-size Jaguar up to date with segment rivals such as the Mercedes-Benz E-Class and Audi A6. Here are some of the key specs of the Jaguar XF.

  • Extensive use of Aluminium has resulted in a reduction of up to 190 kg over the previous model.
  • The interior for the XF has been made larger now that the Jaguar XE fills the entry Jaguar role. Row-two occupants gain 15 mm more legroom, 24 mm more knee room and up to 27 mm more headroom.
  • The infotainment system has had an entire remodel and is the same system currently being used in the Jaguar XE and the Land Rover Discovery Sport. It’s an eight-inch touchscreen with full Smartphone integration and navigation capabilities.
  • The rear suspension design of the XE has also been copied into the XF and supplies it with better handling and ride comfort.
  • XF offers modern technology including full-LED headlights, a laser head-up display, adaptive cruise control with queue assist, lane keep assist, intelligent speed limiter and semi-automated parking.

The all-new XF range will consist of: XF Prestige, XF R-Sport, XF Portfolio, XF S.

The powertrain range will consist of: 132 kW 2.0-litre turbocharged diesel; 177 kW 2.0-litre turbocharged petrol; 250 kW and 280 kW 3.0-litre V6 supercharged petrol. All engines are mated with an eight-speed automatic transmission.

Pricing

2.0D Prestige 2.0D R-Sport 2.0 Prestige 2.0 R-Sport 2.0 Portfolio 3.0 S/C R-Sport 3.0 S/C S
R714 800 R782 700 R749 100 R816 900 R850 200 R1 037 500 R1 178 800

 

Jaguar XF 2.0 diesel 132kW

ENGINE & TRANSMISSION

 

Engine capacity (cc)

1 999

Cylinders

4 in-line

Power (kW)

132 @ 4 000rpm

Torque (Nm)

430 @ 1 750-2 500rpm

Transmission

8-speed automatic

DIMENSIONS

 

Length (mm)

4 954

Width inc./ excl. mirrors (mm)

2 091/ 1 880

Height (mm)

1 457

Wheelbase (mm)

2 960

Track front/ rear (mm)

1 605 / 1 594

Kerbweight (kg)

From 1 595

Boot volume (litres)

540

Fuel tank; usable (litres)

66

PERFORMANCE &
FUEL ECONOMY

 

0-100km/h (sec)

8.1

Top speed (km/h)

229

Fuel consumption (litres/100km) EU combined

4.3

CO2 emissions (g/km)
EU combined

114

Jaguar XF 2.0 petrol 177kW

ENGINE & TRANSMISSION

 

Engine capacity (cc)

1 999

Cylinders

4 in-line

Valves per cylinder

4; DOHC, variable inlet and exhaust cam timing

Power (kW)

177 @ 5 500rpm

Torque (Nm)

340 @ 1 750-4 000rpm

Transmission

8-speed automatic

CHASSIS

 

Front suspension

Double wishbone

Rear suspension

Integral Link

Steering

Rack-and-pinion; electromechanical power-assisted

DIMENSIONS

 

Length (mm)

4 954

Width inc./ excl. mirrors (mm)

2 091/ 1 880

Height (mm)

1 457

Wheelbase (mm)

2 960

Track front/ rear (mm)

1 605 / 1 594

Kerbweight (kg)

From 1 590

Boot volume (litres)

540

Fuel tank; usable (litres)

74

PERFORMANCE &
FUEL ECONOMY

 

0-100km/h (sec)

7.0

Top speed (km/h)

248

Fuel consumption (litres/100km) EU combined

7.5

CO2 emissions (g/km)
EU combined

179

Jaguar XF 3.0 Supercharged petrol 250kW

ENGINE & TRANSMISSION

 

Engine capacity (cc)

2 995

Cylinders

6 in-vee

Valves per cylinder

4; DOHC, variable inlet and exhaust cam timing

Power (kW)

250 @ 6 500rpm

Torque (Nm)

450 @ 4 500rpm

Transmission

8-speed automatic

DIMENSIONS

 

Length (mm)

4 954

Width inc./ excl. mirrors (mm)

2 091 / 1 880

Height (mm)

1 457

Wheelbase (mm)

2 960

Track front/ rear (mm)

1 605 / 1 594

Kerbweight (kg)

From 1 710

Boot volume (litres)

540

Fuel tank; usable (litres)

74

PERFORMANCE &
FUEL ECONOMY

 

0-100km/h (sec)

5.4

Top speed mph (km/h)

250

Fuel consumption (litres/100km) EU combined

8.3

CO2 emissions (g/km)
EU combined

198

Jaguar XF 3.0 Supercharged petrol 280kW

ENGINE & TRANSMISSION

 

Engine capacity (cc)

2 995

Cylinders

6 in-vee

Valves per cylinder

4; DOHC, variable inlet and exhaust cam timing

Power (kW)

280 @ 6 500rpm

Torque (Nm)

450 @ 4 500rpm

Transmission

8-speed automatic

DIMENSIONS

 

Length (mm)

4 954

Width inc./ excl. mirrors (mm)

2 091 / 1 880

Height (mm)

1 457

Wheelbase (mm)

2 960

Track front/ rear (mm)

1 605 / 1 594

Kerbweight (kg)

From 1 710

Boot volume (litres)

540

Fuel tank; usable (litres)

74

PERFORMANCE &
FUEL ECONOMY

 

0-100km/h (sec)

5.3

Top speed (km/h)

250

Fuel consumption (litres/100km) EU combined

8.3

CO2 emissions (g/km)
EU combined

198

Ford Focus range expands in SA

 

Ford is now offering its PowerShift automatic transmission on the 1.0-litre EcoBoost derivatives.

The popular Ford Focus range has been bolstered with the addition of four new options for buyers to consider. Ford is offering its automatic transmission on the Focus 1.0-litre EcoBoost derivatives in both Ambiente and Trend specification levels for both the hatchback and sedan, bringing the total count of Focus models on offer to 14.

“By making the combination available on sedan and hatchback models, and in both Ambiente and Trend specification levels, these two great technologies are more accessible than ever. The Focus 1.0 EcoBoost Ambiente, in particular, offers exceptional value for money for private, company and fleet buyers alike,” says Tracey Delate, General Marketing Manager, Ford Motor Company Sub-Saharan Africa Region.

Engine Performance

Ford’s 3-cylinder 1.0-litre turbocharged engine offers 92 kW and 170 Nm of torque and achieves a claimed fuel consumption figure of 5.5 l/100km when paired with the automatic transmission. Other fuel saving technology includes auto-start-stop, active grille shutter and a regenerative charging system. It’s also worth mentioning that the Ford Focus 1.0T Trend is currently South Africa’s best compact car in the recent Cars.co.ca Consumer Awards.

If you are after a bit more power from your Focus, you can also consider the 1.5-litre EcoBoost Trend derivative that offers 132 kW and 240 Nm.

In terms of safety, the Focus comes well equipped with four airbags, ABS with EBD, emergency brake assist, electronic stability programme with traction control and hill launch assist. Ford MyKey also allows for personal settings on selected driving and in-car features.

Features

In Ambiente trim, the Ford Focus 1.0T comes fitted with electric windows and mirrors, electric power steering, trip computer with ECO mode, manual air-conditioning and a temperature gauge as standard.  An audio system with six speakers is also included while the 4.2-inch multimedia screen features Ford SYNC with Bluetooth and Voice control. There are also two USB ports for added convenience as well as an auxiliary input.

The Focus 1.0T Trend derivative gains 16-inch alloy wheels, fog lights, cruise control with speed limiter and all-round electric windows. This derivative also gets curtain airbags, taking the airbag count up to six.

Buyers can opt for a Styling Pack to personalise their Focus Trend model too, and this option includes 17-inch alloy wheels, rear spoiler, privacy glass, automatic headlamps, adaptive bi-Xenon HID headlamps with LED Daytime Running Lights, dual-zone climate control and heated and electrically folding side mirrors

A Driver Assistance Pack is also on offer as an option and this includes lane departure warning, lane keeping aid, active park assist, pull-out assist, active city stop, rear camera and front and rear parking sensors.

Ford Focus Prices in South Africa

 

Model

Price

Hatchback

 

1.0 EcoBoost Ambiente Manual

R233 900

1.0 EcoBoost Ambiente PowerShift Automatic

R246 900

1.0 EcoBoost Trend Manual

R255 900

1.0 EcoBoost Trend PowerShift Automatic

R267 900

1.5 EcoBoost Trend Manual

R287 900

1.5 EcoBoost Trend Automatic

R304 900

 

 

ST Hatchback

 

2.0 EcoBoost ST1 Manual

R403 900

2.0 EcoBoost ST3 Manual

R443 900

 

 

Sedan

 

1.0 EcoBoost Ambiente Manual

R228 900

1.0 EcoBoost Ambiente PowerShift Automatic               

R241 900

1.0 EcoBoost Trend Manual

R250 900

1.0 EcoBoost Trend PowerShift Automatic

R262 900

1.5 EcoBoost Trend Manual

R281 900

1.5 EcoBoost Trend Automatic

R299 900

All models are sold with a 4-year / 120 000 km warranty, 4-year / 80 000 km service plan and 3-year / unlimited km roadside assistance. A 5-year / unlimited corrosion warranty is also included. 

UPDATE: BMW M2 Pricing in SA (Video)

 

A trusted Cars.co.za source has confirmed the prices of the BMW M2, which will become available in South Africa in April 2016. Producing 272 kW and 465 Nm, the eagerly anticipated sportscar is said to rocket from zero to 100 kph in just 4,3 seconds… 

If the rather impressive BMW M235i just wasn't hot enough for you, BMW is readying the M2 for introduction to the local market. Featuring lightweight aluminium front and rear axles from the BMW M3/M4 models, forged 19-inch aluminium wheels with mixed-size tyres, M Servotronic steering with two settings and suitably effective M compound brakes, the BMW M2 promises entertainment by the bucketload. There's also an electronically controlled Active M Differential, which optimises traction and directional stability. The bonus is that the Dynamic Stability Control system's M Dynamic Mode (MDM) allows wheel slip and moderate, controlled drifts on the track. Should be music to the ears of driving enthusiasts the world over.

Engine and Performance

Like the M235i, the M2's motor is a turbocharged 3.0-litre six-cylinder engine, but this version delivers peak outputs of 272kW and 465Nm. What's more, the torque increases to as much as 500Nm for short periods of time in Overboost mode. According to BMW, the 0-100 kph sprint is dispatched in 4.3 seconds (in the case of the seven-speed M DCT-equipped version), with the manual version fractionally slower. Top speed is limited to the pretty standard 250 kph, but this can be stretched to 270 kph if buyers opt for the M Driver's Package. It's not all about the performance though as BMW is claiming this model is efficient too, with a fuel consumption figure of just 7.9L/100km.

BMW ConnectedDrive Services

BMW, of course, has already made significant progress in integrating connectivity tech into its vehicles and the M2 will receive some very cool applications such as a GoPro app and an M Lap-timer app. The Lap-timer app records the car's speed, longitudinal and lateral acceleration, engine speed, the gear engaged at any one time, the steering angle, the accelerator position and fuel consumption. All of this data allows drivers to analyse their driving and gives them the option of comparing their laps with those of other drivers. The GoPro app allows drivers to use a GoPro camera to film fast laps of the race track. The cameras can be operated using the iDrive Touch Controller and viewed in the Control Display.

Exclusivity

We're likely to see only a few BMW M2s make their way to South Africa. There are four colours available: Long Beach Blue metallic, Alpine White, Black Sapphire and Mineral Grey. Some nice interior touches include M sports seats, an M leather steering wheel, an M footrest and a knee pad on the centre console, trim strips in porous carbon fibre, instruments in M2-specific design and the M logo on the door sill plates, gearshift lever, steering wheel and rev counter. As it stands, the BMW M2 has been confirmed for a South African launch in April 2016.

Standard and Optional Features

Standard features for the BMW M2 will include Dakota leather seats with blue contrasting stitching, an anthracite headliner, BMW Professional radio with hi-fi loudspeaker system and an instrument cluster with extended content displays. A hands-free smartphone facility with USB connectivity will also be standard. 

Optional features will include: steering wheel heating, electrically operated glass roof, interior and exterior mrrors with anti-dazzle function, electrically adjustable seats with memory function, heated seats, rear park distance control, rear camera and navigation. In addition, a Harmon Kardon sound system will be on offer and buyers can also opt for other other services such as real time traffic information and concierge services. 

BMW M2 Price in South Africa

BMW M2 6-speed manual R791 000

BMW M2 M-DCT R841 900

BMW M2 Launch Video

 

GWM M4 Mini SUV – In-Depth Review, Pricing and Specs

Great Wall Motors have certainly persevered and relatively successfully embedded the brand in the South African market. While the company is probably better known for its range of bakkies, the Chinese brand is looking to participate in a very different segment of the market, with the new M4.

Read a full review of the GWM M4 here

Not to be confused with the German speed demon of the same name, the GWM M4 is a compact passenger vehicle, which you could best describe as a mini SUV or perhaps compact crossover.

The approach is to keep things simple, mechanically at least, with a 1.5-litre non-turbo petrol engine, closely related to the Toyota engine of the same size. Power is sent through a 5-speed manual gearbox to the front wheels.

The drivetrain is sufficient if perhaps a little strained at highway speeds. However, where the M4 excels is build quality. The cabin is well built, well specced and solid, however the interior is let down by an awkward driving position – the steering wheel sits very low and the adjustment thereof is limited.

In terms of looks, the M4 is bold and quite attractive, although personally I’m not a huge fan of the chrome elements added for this facelift model.

If GWM can survive the current exchange rate fluctuations and keep the purchase price of this model in a reasonable zone, coupled with the impressive warranty for this segment of the market, I think the M4 has some potential to win a few new buyers over to the brand.

2015 GWM M4 Specs and Details

 

1.5

Price

R189 900

Engine

1.5 litre petrol

Power

77 kW

Torque

138 Nm

Gears

5

0 – 100km/h

Not specified

Fuel economy

7.2L/100 km

Boot space

310 litres

Airbags

2

Stability Control

No, but ABS + EBD

Cruise Control

Std

USB

Std

Bluetooth

Std

Warranty

5 years/100 000km

Service plan

0pt 5years/60 000

Five improvements: facelifted Mercedes-Benz A-Class

1. Adaptive suspension

The general ride comfort of the pre-facelift A-Class was its weak point – the car's suspension felt particularly unyielding over less than optimal road conditions. For the new model, Mercedes-Benz has included a Dynamic Select button that adjusts multiple functions within the car and if you add adaptive suspension as an option, the system allows the driver to toggle the suspension setting from Comfort to Sport. The latter is claimed to provide a better ride/handling balance.

2. Adding a Motorsport Edition

The Motorsport Edition helps link the road-going Mercedes-Benzes with the Formula One team that dominated the 2014 and 2015 F1 world championship seasons. The F1 team is sometimes dismissed as a pure Mercedes-Benz investment with little relevance to the brand's road cars, but these bespoke styling cues bring more excitement to the A-Class.

3. More tech systems from other Benzes

More of Mercedes-Benz’s high-tech safety and driving assistance systems, as fitted to C-Class and S-Class models, have filtered into the petite A-Class. Features such as the LED headlamps and Distronic Plus (with its adaptive cruise control function) are nice additions to the options list. Also new are an 180-degree reverse camera and Active Park Assist that will find you parking spaces and, when engaged by the driver, automatically steer the A-Class into them.

4. Design enhancements

Mercedes-Benz says that more than 60% of A-Class buyers choose the premium compact hatchback purely because of its design. Instead of revamping the design for the facelifted model, Benz merely tweaked a few bits for added aesthetic appeal. On the A 250 Sport for example, the rear exhaust tips are integrated into the bumper. Not many manufacturers do this as it’s an expensive exercise to develop a material that dissipates heat quickly so as not to melt the bumper. LED daytime running lights improve the frontal appeal and all models now come with the ‘diamond studded’ grille.

5. Better infotainment screen with Garmin navigation

The infotainment screen can be optioned up to eight-inches now. It’s easier to see and read on the bigger screen and the resolution seems to appear crisper. If you don’t want to fork out for the whole online navigation system (R22 500) Mercedes-Benz offers a Garmin Map pilot system for just R2 200 that will give you navigation, but without all the real-time traffic that the major system offers.

 

Datsun Go 1.2 Lux (2015) Review

 

In response to concerns about the safety specification of its popular Go hatchback, Datsun has added a driver's airbag to the Lux model. Given the sales success of the Go, the Japanese brand's budget offering is as relevant as ever…

The Go competes in an ultra-competitive segment in which value for money and practicality count for a lot; its rivals are products such as the Chery QQ3, Geely CG2 and FAW V2 (to name just a few examples). And, what has been the secret of its success? It's simple: price. 

At R99 900 for the 1.2 Mid and R114 900 for the 1.2 Lux model tested here, the Go is significantly more affordable than "city car" offerings from mainstream, volume-selling manufacturers.

It's not a bad looking vehicle either, especially if you opt for the Sky Blue paint finish. By the standards of most inner-city runabouts available from new, the Go looks great.

Engine and Performance

Under the bonnet of the Datsun Go is a 1.2-litre three-cylinder petrol engine that produces 50kW and 104Nm and feeds power to the front wheels via a five-speed manual transmission. Those outputs suggest that the Go should feel sluggish to drive, but the Datsun Go tips the scales at around 800 kg. As a result, the engine doesn't have to work hard to get the vehicle moving; the Go's performance round town is spritely and it is pleasant to drive at the urban speed limit.

Datsun claims the Go will reach 100 kph from standstill in around 13 seconds, which doesn't sound that fast, but that figure doesn't tell the full story. After driving both on the highway and urban roads during the week-long test period, we saw an average fuel consumption reading of 5.9 L/100 km, which is a good for a vehicle in this segment.

Ride and Handling

For a car costing this little, you'd expect mediocre refinement, but although the noise from the 1.2-litre three-pot permeates to the cabin, road noise is fairly low at lower speeds. The power steering is light and the Go's agility in confined spaces is aided by its compact size and tight turning circle, which makes city parking so easy.

On the open road, the Go starts to battle at higher speeds, however. It'll reach 120 kph relatively easily, but you probably won't feel comfortable travelling at the national speed limit because the powertrain feels a little strained. The claimed top speed is 161 kph.

Features and Equipment

The Datsun Go 1.2 Lux has a trip computer, power steering, air conditioning, front electric windows, and a USB port (although this is for charging devices and not for music playback). What's more, the cabin feels comparatively spacious – the Go might not be quite as big as the market-dominating light hatchbacks, but it is bigger than most "city cars", which means that rear passengers will have a bit more legroom in the Datsun than most of the vehicles in its price bracket…   

This model also features a mobile docking station which allows you to connect your mobile device via the aux input for music playback. Some dealers have omitted this option and offered an aftermarket radio instead. This particular unit had the radio option and, in terms of ease of use, it's arguably the less clunky of the two systems.

The Elephant in the Room

When we first drove a Go we were concerned that the Datsun was equipped with neither anti-lock brakes (ABS) nor (at least) a driver's airbag. This 1.2 Lux model has one of those: a single 'bag for the driver.

Since then, a Datsun Go failed the standard 64 kph front offset crash test and that video went viral. NCAP safety testers commented that the vehicle's structure and body shell collapsed, which would have made the fitment of an airbag pointless…

This leads us to ask: why did Datsun fit an airbag when anti-lock brakes (ABS) would have been the most logical option? ABS would help the vehicle stop better and as the saying goes, "prevention is better than cure."

Despite our (and many other publications') criticisms of the Go for its lack of safety features, research shows the general buying public rates affordability above safety in terms of its requirements of a vehicle in the Go's segment. Go buyers are looking for a new car and don't have a lot of money to spend. And, you get what you pay for with this car and keep in mind that similarly priced vehicles in this segment also lack safety features that many of us take for granted.

Take a look at this social media survey which indicates a car buyer's priorities. Value for money counts for so much and this is why Datsun Go is popular. The sales figures for the Datsun Go in 2015 indicate that value for money far outweighs specification and safety, and incredibly the Datsun Go was the 8th most popular car in terms of sales.

Verdict and Summary

As we mentioned in our first experience with this car (read it here), we’re impressed with the simplicity and affordability of the Datsun Go. Its performance around town is good and we enjoy "the city car life". However, the Go's poor performance in crash testing and lack of ABS make it difficult for us to recommend it to consumers. Remove safety from the equation and you’re looking at a vehicle that’s better than you think and scores highly in terms of affordability. It is also worth noting that Datsun dealers operate in conjunction with Nissan South Africa's established network, which should provide buyers peace of mind in terms of ongoing after-sales support.   

Price and after-sales support

The Datsun Go range starts at R99 900 for the 1.2 Mid, while this 1.2 Lux with an airbag comes in at R114 900. The vehicle comes with a 3 year / 100 000km warranty while a service plan is optional.

We like: Pleasant to drive at low speeds, ease of use around town, willing engine, outstanding value for money.

We don’t like: Lack of safety features such as anti-lock brakes, lack of noise insulation.

Also consider: Chery QQ, Chevrolet Spark, Suzuki Celerio

Crossover Comparison: Honda HR-V vs Mazda CX-3

 

The compact crossover market is one of the most hotly contested vehicle segments in South Africa. In this review, two Japanese rivals square off and despite some differences, both are rather good. Which one is the better buy, however?

SHORT READ

LONG READ

The crossover market has grown tremendously over the past few years and it’s easy to see why. There are numerous benefits to a crossover. It incorporates elements of ruggedness and hints at marginal off-road ability, a raised driving positions affords better visibility and it's easy to get you, your passengers and an assortment of luggage in and out of the vehicle.

The principle behind a crossover is simple. Take a normal family hatchback, raise its ground clearance, hike up the driving position a little, bolt on some cosmetic exterior and interior upgrades and you have a purposefully-styled vehicle that is compact, as well as versatile.

Short Read

The Mazda CX-3 strikes the first blow in this comparison simply because it is the better-looking contestant (courtesy of its sinuous Kodo design language). That’s not to say the Honda HR-V is unattractive; its looks are just more colour-dependent. The test unit's white finish contrasts well with the model’s black body cladding, for example. 

Whereas the HR-V boasts a fresh-looking interior with reasonable ergonomics, the CX-3's cabin is sportier, but feels a little sparse at first glance. Upon detailed inspection, you’ll notice both vehicles seem solid and well-built, but the Mazda feels like it is “built to last longer”.

The heated seats in the Honda are a welcome feature for those who have cold winters, while the HDMI port is a great way to connect devices. The Mazda is very well equipped and has very similar level of specification (satnav is available as an option), but given the price difference between the two, the CX-3 wins the specification-for-the-money battle.

The Mazda’s engine is the more refined of the two, plus it offers more power. What's more, the CX-3's automatic transmission has the edge on the Honda’s CVT by virtue of better responses to variable throttle inputs. The Mazda is also the more agile of the two, but its big wheels (and lower-profile tyres) impact negatively on its ride quality. If you're looking for a smoother ride quality (above everything else) from a driving experience, the Honda is better. 

As a stylish, fashionable and driver-focused offering, the Mazda adds a welcome element of sportiness to the segment. While the contenders are tied in terms of safety and fuel economy, in terms of driver enjoyment and outright value for money, the Mazda holds the edge.

However, the Honda is so much more practical than the CX-3 thanks to that trademark folding-seat setup and more spacious interior. By virtue of its versatility, space utilisation and superior ride quality, the Honda HR-V is the winner.

Both contestants sit near the top of the pile in the compact crossover segment. The Nissan Qashqai which is great to drive, boasts impressive levels of refinement and, provided you select the right engine/spec, offers sensible value for money. But the Nissan is the most expensive of the lot. Another Nissan, the Juke, has polarising looks, but is worth a look.

Long Read

What are we comparing?

The two vehicles featured in this comparative review are the Honda HR-V 1.8 Elegance and the Mazda CX-3 Individual Auto. They are the top-spec versions of their respective product line-ups and despite the price difference of about R45 000, there’s not much to separate the two.

The contenders were introduced to the South African market in 2015 as competitors to the Nissan Qashqai. There are two Honda HR-Vs to choose from: a 1.5 Comfort and 1.8 Elegance, while the Mazda has a one-engine, multiple trim-level line-up. The advantage goes to the Mazda for offering the consumer the choice of either a manual or automatic transmission.

Exterior styling

Both the Mazda and Honda have typical crossover design cues. They look rugged and purposeful, with a dashes of design flair added to the mix, plus daytime running lights that add to kerb appeal.

Design is such a subjective topic, but all our testers agreed that the Mazda CX-3 has the most striking design of the two. A particular highlight was those two-tone 18-inch alloy wheels, which are very stylish.

Summary: The Mazda CX-3 is the winner of the beauty contest thanks to its Kodo design language. That’s not to say that the Honda HR-V isn’t attractive. In the right colour, such as white, the HR-V is rather eye-catching too.

Interior design and finish

Both facias are contemporarily styled, feature-laden and dominated by large touchscreens. Ergonomics are good too.

However, there is a big difference insofar as build quality is concerned. As we've experienced before, the build quality of the Thailand-made HR-V is good, but not as good as that of the Japanese-made CX-3. While the Honda HR-V is not poorly made in any way, it’s just that the Mazda CX-3, which is the more affordable of the two, feels the most solid. 

The Honda offers a smartly designed dashboard and cabin, with plenty of practical places to put your keys and cellphone. We’re big fans of the USB/HDMI positioning. It is almost out of sight and prevents cables from being draped across the HR-V's transmission tunnel.

The Mazda’s cabin feels minimalist and sparse compared with the Honda. The infotainment controls have been placed on the centre console next to the handbrake, which frees up some space. There’s also a heads-up display on this top-spec model, but taller drivers will battle to find an ideal driving position to gain maximum benefit from the device.

Summary: The Mazda CX-3 has the sportier of the two interiors, but feels a little sparse at first glance. Upon detailed inspection, you’ll notice that both vehicles are solid and well-built, but it’s the Mazda that feels like it's built to last the longest.

Interior features

The price tags of these vehicles both fall under R400 000 and it’s impressive to see how much standard specification has been crammed into the Mazda and Honda.

The HR-V has climate control, auto lights and wipers, heated seats, cruise control, rear parking sensors and a multifunction steering wheel. It also features USB and HDMI ports, as well as Bluetooth. The infotainment and climate control functions are accessible via the touchscreen and while the system is fairly intuitive, it takes a few touch inputs for the system to recognise a command. Satellite navigation is possible through a smartphone app. Leather upholstery is standard.

The CX-3 offers rear park distance control, a reverse camera, cruise control, a multifunction steering wheel, climate control, auto lights and wipers and a heads-up display. There are USB (2x) and auxiliary ports, as well as Bluetooth connectivity and, as this is the top-spec model, partial leather trim with satellite navigation is available as an option. There are two ways to use the infotainment system: either use the controller dial located near the handbrake or the touchscreen. Given that in-car touchscreens are not quite as reactive as those of mobile phones, it’s best to use the dial and its adjacent buttons.

Summary: The heated seats in the Honda are a welcome feature for those who have cold winters, while the HDMI port is a great way to connect devices. The Mazda CX-3 is very well-equipped too and satnav is available as an option. However, given the price difference between the two, the Mazda CX-3 wins the specification battle.

Practicality

Honda's products are well known for their interior practicality. Thanks to its trademark seats, the HR-V's luggage area can grow from generous to cavernous, and a big mountain bike and its accessories can be loaded with ease. The split-loading bench allows the accommodation of a rear passenger even if you’re hauling abnormally long items such as curtain rails.

The Honda is a longer, wider and higher vehicle than the Mazda. While it’s not a huge difference, there’s a better use of space, which is evident in its boot dimensions. The Honda can swallow 393L worth of kit, but the Mazda only 264L.

There’s a sense of space in the Honda that the Mazda cannot replicate. The CX-3's cabin feels a little claustrophobic and very similar to the Mazda2 upon which it is based. The Honda has plenty of head and legroom for driver and passengers alike. The Mazda CX-3 is fine for driver and passenger, but rear legroom is a little tight.

Summary: The Honda trounces the Mazda in this department thanks to its patented seats that fold neatly into the floor. With this arrangement, loading capacity is exceptional and space generous. The Mazda CX-3 is comparably compact.

Powerplant and refinement

Despite the age of turbocharging being in full swing, both of these vehicles use naturally-aspirated motors. The Mazda and the Honda tested here are both automatics, while only the Mazda has the option of a manual gearbox.

The CX-3 has a 2.0-litre four-cylinder motor delivering 115kW and 204Nm. The brand has been a firm believer in its Sky-Activ engines, which are quite impressive. Power is fed to the front wheels through a six-speed automatic gearbox.

The HR-V's 1.8-litre four-cylinder engine produces 105kW and 172Nm and powers the front wheels through a CVT (as opposed to a conventional automatic). CVTs are supposedly lighter on fuel, which is something we'll address later.

The Mazda immediately feels the livelier of the two and offers an involving and youthful driving experience. The engine does get a little coarse towards the top of the rev range, but the mechanical noise doesn’t intrude into the cabin too much.

The Honda is the softer of the two and this is purely down to its CVT. These transmissions are the antithesis of performance driving and are instead tuned to deliver a smooth driving experience. When you’re not pressing on, the Honda offers a relaxing drive, but if you accelerate aggressively, the engine drones loudly enough to translate into the cabin.

Summary: The Mazda’s engine is the more refined of the two, plus it offers more power. The automatic gearbox is better than the Honda’s CVT as it’s more responsive.

Ride and handling

Neither these vehicles are performance orientated, which means ride comfort and refinement take priority.

Thanks to its compact dimensions, the Mazda feels the more nimble of the two vehicles. The Honda behaves more like a typical SUV and exhibits the kind of body roll associated with a higher crossover. Both suspensions soak up the bumps really well, but due to the 18-inch alloys on the Mazda, traversing bumps in the road can be a little jarring. The Honda’s 17-inch alloys fare a little better, but it’s evident that these lower-profile tyres aren’t happy on imperfect South African roads.

Summary: The Mazda is more agile than the Honda, but the latter offers a more absorbent ride.

Safety features

With families in mind, both the Honda and Mazda are well equipped in terms of active and passive safety features. Both vehicles come with six airbags, ABS with EBD and brake assist, stability control as well as Isofix mounts for child seats. Both vehicles come with rear parking sensors as well as full-size spare tyres.

Summary: It’s a tie in terms of safety. 

Fuel economy

Both vehicles offer average fuel consumption. Honda claims 6.8l/100km for its HR-V, while Mazda’s CX-3 is claimed to return just 6.1L/100km. In reality, you’re likely to see closer to around 7.5L/100km.

Summary: These two vehicles are evenly matched in terms of fuel economy.

Pricing and after sales

The Mazda CX-3 2.0 Individual Auto retails for R325 900. You get a 3-year/unlimited mileage warranty, as well as a 3-year/ unlimited mileage service plan. Mazda South Africa has 47 dealers.

The Honda HR-V 1.8 Elegance retails for R370 500. You get a 5-year/200 000 km warranty, as well as a 4-year/60 000 km service plan. There are 38 Honda dealerships in South Africa.

Summary: In terms of specification, engine and outright value for money, the Mazda CX-3 holds the edge. But, if you require optimal practicality, then you should not ignore the marginally more expensive Honda.

Verdict

Both contestants sit near the top of the pile in the compact crossover segment. The Nissan Qashqai which is great to drive, boasts impressive levels of refinement and, provided you select the right engine/spec, offers sensible value for money. But the Nissan is the most expensive of the lot. Another Nissan, the Juke, has polarising looks, but is worth a look.

As a stylish, fashionable and driver-focused offering, the Mazda adds a welcome element of sportiness to the segment. While the contenders are tied in terms of safety and fuel economy, in terms of driver enjoyment and outright value for money, the Mazda holds the edge.

However, the Honda is so much more practical than the CX-3 thanks to that trademark folding-seat setup and more spacious interior. By virtue of its versatility, space utilisation and superior ride quality, the Honda HR-V is the winner.

Compare these two vehicles here.

Buy a new Honda HR-V here.

Buy a new Mazda CX-3 here.

Maserati Ghibli S At The Red Line – Video Review

 

In the latest James Bond movie, one of the eternal starlets of the silver screen, Monica Belluci, makes an all-too-brief appearance. Even though her character’s short narrative is overshadowed by the death of her husband, and her own imminent assassination, Ms Belluci is the very essence of sultry, classic beauty, a wonderful anachronism in the gritty modern world of the Daniel Craig’s era.

And so when I first encountered the Maserati Ghibli S, underground in a dimly lit parking lot, I couldn’t help but think of the Italian actress.

The Ghibli is striking in the metal. Its flowing lines barely make an allowance for four doors, evoking a more athletic shape reminiscent of the sports cars in Maserati’s past and present line up.

The looks, the heady exhaust note, the promise of new generation twin turbo V6 engine all made me a bit weak at the knees, but had the Italian marque done enough to make this a practical, usable, sedan?

We took the car to a deserted, twisty road to find out, and the result is our latest video.

A full written review penned by Ciro will follow this video next week.

 

Chevrolet Trailblazer 2.8D 4×4 LTZ Automatic (2016) Review

 

The Trailblazer has garnered plenty of praise since its launch, but sales statistics suggest the Chevrolet has failed to capture the imagination of the South African leisure-vehicle buyer. We spent a month with the flagship LTZ model to figure out why this could be the case.

With fewer than a thousand sales in 2015, compared with the outgoing Toyota Fortuner’s 8 000+, General Motors South Africa must consider the South African market's acceptances (or lack thereof) of the Trailblazer with a large degree of frustration. It is certainly a somewhat baffling situation to us – we rate the Trailblazer highly, going so far as to nominate it as a Leisure Category semi-finalist in our inaugural Cars.co.za Consumer Awards.

Do you own a Chevrolet Trailblazer? If so, please let us know what you think of it by completing this survey.

The Trailblazer was conceived and developed with a very clear purpose – to be better than an established favourite (the Fortuner), and to reign supreme in the very popular bakkie-based SUV segment. And yet, this has not happened.

Now, in the face of increased competition not only from the imminent all-new Fortuner, but also the dramatically improved  Ford Everest, is the Trailblazer doomed to remain an also-ran in a vital segment? To find out, we spent a few weeks with the range's flagship model, drove many kilometres on a variety of surfaces, and loaded the test unit to the roof with people as well as leisure gear.

Big… but not so bold


Trailblazer LTZ specification means extra chrome and 18-inch alloy wheels.

By now the Trailblazer is a familiar sight on South African roads and it remains a handsome vehicle that errs on the conservative side of the styling spectrum. This flagship LTZ model is fitted with 18-inch alloys wrapped in Bridgestone Dueler rubber. A full-sized spare wheel is mounted underneath the vehicle. Side steps are fitted, as are functional roof rails that can carry a load of up to 100 kg. Besides the odd bit of chrome here and there, there isn’t all that much to distinguish the LTZ from lesser Trailblazers. In fact, compared with the bold machismo of the new Ford Everest, as well as the instant recognition and status that come part and parcel with owning a Fortuner, the Trailblazer’s relative anonymity may be one of the reasons why the market has struggled to warm to it.

Note, however, that a facelift is on the way much later in 2016 that could address this in a rather dramatic fashion. Rumours abound that the Trailblazer will get the same face as the American-specification Colorado pick-up, which is a rather handsome beast as I’m sure you’ll agree (see the pic below).


The forthcoming Trailblazer update could see it adopt the face of the US-market Colorado pick-up.

Upgraded cabin


Facia design shared with Isuzu, but finish is more upmarket following 2014 update. Build quality is very good.

Hop up into the cabin and the Trailblazer's facia will be instantly familiar to anyone who has ever sat in an Isuzu KB, a vehicle with which the Chevrolet shares many genes. In 2014, the Trailblazer underwent a minor upgrade that moved the cabin upmarket in terms of colour coordination, as well as through the fitment of the MyLink infotainment system. The current combination of dark grey plastic, light grey leather upholstery and piano black detailing works relatively well, but some satin trim accents would have lifted the ambience to the next level. This may be addressed with the facelift.

Compared with some of the first Trailblazers, this latest version appears to be very impressively built – neither a rattle nor a squeak presented itself throughout my extended test term – and there were very rough gravel sections on the test route. So, although you’ll struggle to find soft-touch plastics and the facia serves up little in the way of surprise-and-delight features, I’d rate the Chevrolet as near the top of the class in terms of creating a perception of solidity.

Finding a comfy driving position should not present any problems, as the driver’s seat is fully electrically adjustable, but it is disappointing that the steering column doesn’t offer reach adjustment – that's a drawback of the latest Ford Everest as well. Nevertheless, I spent six stints of more than 400 km each behind the wheel of the Chevrolet and can’t complain about a lack of long-distance comfort. Note that the front passenger seat is also height-adjustable, albeit manually.

Those seated in the second row had no reasons to complain, either. The seats are mounted slightly higher, to afford their occupants a good view out of the vehicle. The seatbacks also offer a welcome reclining function and there are overhead ventilation outlets and even a separate ventilation speed control knob. Boosting the family/leisure capability of the vehicle, there are seatback pockets, a multitude of drinks holders and a 12V outlet for those in the second row.

Genuine seven-seater SUV


Neat lidded storage compartment mounted near the back of the load area. 

As far as seven-seaters go, the Trailblazer affords a surprisingly generous amount of passenger space in its third row. Again, you sit higher, so taller passengers' heads will be in close proximity to the roof lining. Legroom is quite generous, and certainly sufficient for average-sized adults, but you sit very upright, which is not very comfortable. Again, overhead ventilation outlets and drinks holders are supplied. Access to the third row is quite convenient, too. In fact, the second row of seats tumble forward and out of the way in a one-handed operation.

Moving backwards to the luggage compartment, the large tailgate opens up to a height of 1,8m and reveals a high loading level, as well as a compromised luggage area when the third-row seats are in position. This, of course, is to be expected, especially when you consider the relatively spacious third-row seating. Those two rearmost seats can easily be folded forward, however, and when this is done the luggage area is suitably large for family holiday use. But the floor is high, so you have to hoist heavy stuff up quite some way before they can be slid onto the floor.

A very nice touch is a lidded compartment in the luggage area floor. It is spacious enough for wet shoes or other dirty leisure items, and can be easily unbolted from the boot floor, taken out, and cleaned. Very handy indeed…

If you need to transport (very) big items, especially long ones, you’d be pleased to know that the utility loading space is truly capacious when you fold the second row of seats forward. I could fit two mountain bikes in there (on top of each other) without needing to take off their wheels, handlebars or seats.

The features race


Hard buttons for MyLink infotainment system are not sensitive enough.

Being the top-spec model, you’d rightly expect the Trailblazer LTZ to come with heaps of toys. Unfortunately, it misses a few tricks, especially now that the Ford Everest, even in XLT specification, has set the bar so high.

Yes, the Trailblazer features a fairly comprehensive trip computer, but the display looks old fashioned compared with the slick set-up in the new Everest. The Trailblazer only offers single-zone climate control (compared with the Everest XLT’s dual-zone), and it lacks auto lights and rain-sensing wipers. Even the highly lauded MyLink infotainment system has dated (compared with Ford’s latest offering), and the “hard” buttons on the screen's plastic surround are not sensitive enough. Still, the system should be comprehensive enough for most needs and a rear-camera display is incorporated.

Also keep in mind that the Trailblazer does have an electrically adjustable driver seat (the Everest XLT's is manual) and the spare on the Everest is a 17-inch steel item (as opposed to a full-size alloy on the Chevrolet).

Other standard features on this Trailblazer include cruise control, electrically folding side mirrors, rear Isofix child seat anchorages, electronic stability control and six airbags.

On the road… and off


Trailblazer does a commendable job off-road, and ride/stability is very good on gravel. 

Fire up the Trailblazer’s 2,8-litre Duramax turbodiesel motor and the initial clatter is quite agricultural. Thankfully, with speed, the engine become less vocal and cruising at the national speed limit is a calm, relaxing affair. The engine develops 144 kW and 500 Nm of torque, the latter figure from 2000 rpm. The power and torque figures are certainly competitive, and once it gets going, the Trailblazer certainly feels powerful enough. Off the mark, however, the engine and six-speed automatic transmission struggle to disguise the vehicle’s weight, so it can feel sluggish. We achieved an impressive fuel consumption figure of 9,4L/100km, which is actually slightly less than what Chevrolet claims (9,5L/100km). This translates to a range of over 800 km on a single 76-litre tank.

With a family of five and a boot full of luggage and holiday gear on board, the Trailblazer proved a very impressive kilometre muncher. The ride quality is certainly superior to the Fortuner’s and probably on par with the new Everest. What also impressed was the insulation of the cabin – there was little intrusion of wind and road noise, even at higher speeds and on coarser surfaces. The steering set-up is predictably light and devoid of feel, but pleasingly accurate. Around town the Trailblazer’s size and comfort-oriented set-up results in somewhat of a lumbering demeanour, especially when attempting to nip somewhere in town quickly, but out on the open road, there is precious little to fault.

We also headed onto gravel for long stints, and here the Trailblazer's good showing continued. The suspension (and tyres) iron out many of the thumps and bumps, but allow just enough through to the cabin, so that the driver knows exactly what the grip and traction levels are. The cabin also stayed impressively dust free in these conditions. If you want to head into the rougher stuff, the Trailblazer may not be the best in this segment, however. Yes, it offers an easily understandable off-road system (a rotary knob access 2/4H/4L modes) and hill-descent control, as well as a limited slip differential, but hardcore off-roaders will want a manually locking diff as well as more ground clearance. The LTZ Auto specification Trailblazer’s ground clearance is 218 mm, compared with the 239 mm of the LT-spec.

So, what’s the problem?


Would the Trailblazer have sold better if it was badged as an Isuzu in South Africa? 

As you’ve just read, there’s not terribly much wrong with the Chevrolet Trailblazer. In fact, as a leisure/family vehicle, it must still rate as one of the most capable offerings on the market. Then why aren’t more of you buying it? I’ve given it a lot of thought, and think it’s due to a combination of the following;

  • Given the market’s love for Toyota products in this country, the Trailblazer isn’t priced aggressively enough against the Fortuner, even though it might be the superior product. Of course, the Fortuner is produced in South Africa, whereas the Trailblazer is imported, so the pricing problem is understandable. Nevertheless, it’s an issue. Now add the run-out incentives and special editions that have been offered on the Fortuner for a good while now, and the appeal of the Toyota grows further. Our Ownership Satisfaction survey also appears to point to another potential issue: the Chevrolet sales process is not nearly as highly rated as Toyota's, particularly in areas such as product knowledge and trade-in price offered.
  • The Trailblazer lacks a stand-out feature. The Fortuner’s “must-have” feature is that it is a Toyota Fortuner, and everything that implies and the Everest brings butch looks and loads of technology to the segment. The Trailblazer is good at many things, but it needs to blow our socks off, somehow… with something… Again, owners appear to agree: there is nothing particularly wrong with the Trailblazer. In fact, according to survey data it runs the Fortuner very close in terms of overall product satisfaction.
  • The Trailblazer is not (badged as) an Isuzu. Back in the ‘90s, when the Camry was selling well and before the Fortuner was even born, Isuzu sold a vehicle called the Frontier in South Africa. It was very popular. Then, it disappeared from the market, creating a vacuum into which the Fortuner was born. Talk about dropping the ball… The Isuzu brand is still highly respected and loved in South Africa. Chevrolet, in this country at least, is not known (anymore) for tough bakkies and macho SUVs. The Trailblazer may have received a more hearty welcome had it been badged as a modern-day Isuzu Frontier.
  • After-sales service – It has always been a perception that Toyota after-sales service was a very big reason for its sales success, and our survey proves it. Owners rate Toyota tops for after-sales service, out of the 12 brands with a big enough sample size. Chevrolet, on the other hand, is far from the top three…

 

Verdict

As mentioned earlier in this report, a facelifted version of the Trailblazer will appear in the not too distant future, reportedly boasting the more aggressive look of the brand’s American pick-ups and SUVs, as well as LED-infused headlamps, new wheels, bumpers and an upgraded interior. As evidenced by this seemingly cosmetic-only update, there is not much wrong with the Trailblazer as an overall package. In fact, it is a first-rate family cum leisure vehicle. It really is up to General Motors to ignite this offering’s potential – sharpen the pencils on the pricing, offer better trade-in values and improve the after-sales service. All that said, if you’re in the market for a robust, capable seven-seat vehicle, then the Chevrolet Trailblazer should not be ignored – owners seem to be very happy with them.

Price and After-Sales Support

The Chevrolet Trailblazer 2,8D 4×4 LTZ automatic sells for R591 500 and comes back with a 5-years/120 000km warranty and 5-years/90 000km service plan. The service intervals are scheduled for every 15 000km.

We like: Spaciousness, fuel economy, solidity, cruising comfort

We don’t like: Lack of some features, price, sluggish off the mark

Also consider: Toyota Fortuner (wait for the new one), Ford Everest, Mitsubishi Pajero Sport (wait for the new one)

Click here to compare the Trailblazer with the Toyota Fortuner and Ford Everest.