ICE vs EV: Total 5-year cost of ownership in SA

April’s record-breaking fuel hike seeing 95 unleaded jump to more than R23/litre has turned ICE vehicle ownership into a budget crisis. But can an EV actually bridge the upfront price gap through running costs alone? We crunch the 5-year numbers on SA’s favourite petrol-powered B-segment hatch against its closest electric challenger. It’s ICE vs EV…

Although Cars.co.za is a car site, right now we wouldn’t blame you for shopping for a bicycle, hiking shoes, or considering public transport. With April’s fuel price increase set to vaporise wallets and antagonise motorists, it’s only logical to ask whether an EV would be cheaper to run in the long run. It’s the battle of ICE vs EV…

And with good reason. In 2021, using inland fuel prices, you’d have paid an average of R17.40 for a litre of petrol. Thanks to the Middle East conflict, inland today it’s over R23/litre. Now, there’s much to dislike about Nersa’s repeated inability to keep Eskom’s tentacles out of the SA public’s piggybanks, but in truth, electricity price increases have been far steadier than fuel, if still way above consumer inflation. Five years ago, residential rates averaged at about R2.10/kWh, compared to roughly R3.40/kWh in 2026.

With that in mind, if you’d bought a Volkswagen Polo 1.0 TSI 5 years ago and your neighbour an electric BYD Dolphin Standard,who’d have the most change left by each month-end in 2026? And what if you went completely bargain basement with the BYD Dolphin Surf, even if it’s more compact in dimensions and modest in aspirations?

As the Polo’s closest-sized electric competitors, neither BYD was yet available for sale in 2021. To enable a real-world 5-year comparison, combining current and historical data, we’ve had to simulate its price against the prevailing market of that period.

VW Polo vs BYD Dolphin: Does the fuel saving bridge the R125k gap?

Owing to fewer number of moving parts and common sense dictating that an EV’s running costs will always be less than that of a conventional internal combustion-powered (ICE) car, historically the latter’s perceived benefit would often be diminished by its disproportionate selling price. Once that discrepancy is cleared by using near-equivalent pricing, the benefit is much clearer.

Metric2021 VW Polo 1.0 TSI Life DSG2021 BYD Dolphin (Standard)2021 BYD Dolphin Surf (Comfort)
Launch price (2021)R370 000R495 000R339 900
Initial price gapR125 000-R30 100
Total energy cost (5 years)R135 100R34 875R30 600
Energy cost per kmR1.50/kmR0.39/kmR0.34/km
Maintenance cost per kmR0.34/kmR0.13/kmR0.13/km
Total running cost per kmR1.84/kmR0.52/kmR0.47/km
Total 5-year running costR165 600R46 875R42 300
Operating savingR116 825R123 300

The 90 000km reality: Why 2026 petrol prices make EVs inevitable

At a weighted 5-year average of R21.80/L, the Polo owner spends nearly R100 000 more on energy than the EV owner over the same distance. Maintenance, however, is where the true hidden costs lurk.

The real savings start happening only from 90 000 km onwards. From 45 000 km onwards, all services carried out on a Polo are out-of-pocket. After 90 000 km, the car would have undergone its second owner-financed major service (the previous one was at 60 000 km); comprising pricey items such as DSG gearbox flushes, belts, spark plug replacements, and at least one set of new brake pads.

Because the BYD’s primary retardation originates by means of electric resistance, even at 90 000 km, its brakes will still be in good shape. In both cases, the tyres would have also been replaced. Rubber replacement is the only area where an EV will forever lag behind an ICE rival. The BYD’s high mass and instant torque will see it chewing through tyres faster, so by 90 000 km, you might already be nearing your 3rd set of tyres.

That said, owing to its comprehensive maintenance plan, the latter will still only be the only expected extra for the Dolphin. At 1 000 km, the Polo is still the cheaper car. By 45 000 km, it’s a tie with the Dolphin, except you are now paying R0.34 maintenance tax per km thanks to its lapsed service plan versus R0.13 per km for the Dolphin – essentially, just the tyres. So, by 90 000 km, the latter has clawed back its R125k premium through accumulated energy and maintenance savings.

From R17 to R23.36 per litre: How 5 years of fuel hikes broke the ICE advantage

By now, you may be thinking that the petrol Polo is a lost cause, and certainly beyond 5 years of ownership, its running costs will progressively exceed those of the electric BYD. However, when ring-fencing the total cost of ownership (pertaining to vehicle purchase, fuel and tyres used) to the solely originally stated 5-year period, the facts show the Polo still trumps the bigger BYD by the narrowest of margins.

BYD Dolphin Surf 5-year TCO: R381 500

VW Polo 5-year TCO: R535 600

BYD Dolphin (Standard) 5-year TCO: R541 875

The difference (Standard vs Polo): R6,275 At face value, the numbers don’t lie. The Polo puts one small takeaway pizza (about R104) each month on your table over the original intended 5-year period. What it doesn’t do is protect you from future fuel shocks like those triggered by the Middle Eastern conflict, whereas had you opted for any of the 2 BYDs, you’d be future-proofed against not only price-volatility anxiety, but even fuel shortages if you are charging using solar power.

VW maintenance plan vs. BYD: Does pre-paying your services save the Polo?

To make this even more of an equitable comparison – and pocket some more peace of mind – Polo owners can extend the standard 3-year/45 000 km service plan with Volkswagen’s EasyDrive programme to 5 years/90 000 km for approximately R15 300. When you consider that out-of-pocket costs for the major 60 000 km and 90 000 km services (including DSG oil, spark plugs and filters) can easily exceed R30 000 at today’s dealership rates, the plan effectively pays for itself, offering a gross saving of over R15 000.

The only caveat is that the decision to extend must be made before the original plan expires. On the other hand, should an owner plan to sell the car shortly thereafter, they benefit from not having had to make the extra capital outlay. The downside is it also condemns the car to never qualifying for a dealer-grade maintenance plan again. (Car companies don’t like taking on the risk of unknown service history gaps.)

CategoryVW Polo 1.0 TSI (with maintenance plan)BYD Dolphin StandardBYD Dolphin Surf (Comfort)
R339 900
Purchase priceR370 000R495 000R339 900
Plan upgradeR15 300R0 (standard)R0 (standard)
Energy cost (90 000 km)R133 416R34 875R30 600
Tyres and consumablesR8 500R12 000R11 000
5-year TCOR527 216R541 875R381 500
The new difference+R14 659-R147 400

In 2021, the idea of ICE vs EV being a fair fight based on price was a fantasy. In 2026, it is a mathematical reality. While the Polo is technically cheaper over the 5-year measurement period, the gap is now so narrow that the choice is no longer about the bank balance; it’s about the lifestyle and resilience against future fuel price instability.

The slower and more compact Dolphin Surf is the outlier here as it was cheaper than the Polo from the outset and, as a result, its figures are disproportionately skewed in its favour.

However, getting back to the original argument: if you want the flexibility of a lower purchase price and the familiarity of the ICE network, the Polo is your winner.

But if you want to stop doomscrolling the fuel price announcements every first Wednesday of the month, the BYD Dolphin has earned its seat at the table. So, in 2026, the “electric gap” hasn’t just closed; in the face of R23.36 for a litre petrol, it has effectively flatlined.

MG3 vs Suzuki Swift vs VW Polo Vivo (2026): Ultimate Budget Hatch Comparison

In the South African motoring landscape, few segments are as vital or as fiercely contested as the budget hatchback market. For years, the Volkswagen Polo Vivo and the Suzuki Swift have traded blows at the top of the sales charts, but a new challenger has arrived to disrupt the status quo...

The MG3 marks the first modern hatchback entry from a Chinese brand in South Africa, promising high specifications and an aggressive price point. To see if it has the substance to match its impressive on-paper credentials, we pitted it against the locally built stalwart from the Eastern Cape and the frugal favourite from Japan in the battle of the best budget hatchback.

The established heavyweight: Volkswagen Polo Vivo

The Polo Vivo is more than just a car; it is a South African institution. Built at the Volkswagen Group Africa plant in Kariega, it remains the country’s best-selling passenger vehicle. In Life trim, the Vivo 1.4 offers a sense of maturity and solidity that is often lacking in the budget segment.

While it is the most expensive car in this comparison, Volkswagen has updated the 2026 model year to include more value. New additions like rear parking sensors, a reverse camera, and additional airbags help bridge the gap to its more modern rivals. The 1.4-litre naturally aspirated engine may be old-school, but its proven track record for longevity is a significant draw for many local buyers.

The frugal favourite: Suzuki Swift

The Suzuki Swift has carved out a massive following thanks to its exceptional value and industry-leading fuel efficiency. In top-spec GLX manual form, it offers a wealth of features including keyless entry, automatic climate control, and a leather-wrapped steering wheel.

The move to a 1.2-litre three-cylinder engine in the latest generation has made the Swift even more economical. During our testing, it consistently returned figures under 5.0 L/100 km, a feat neither of its rivals could match.

Despite its light weight, the Swift remains impressively well-damped, handling road imperfections with a level of refinement that belies its budget positioning.

The new challenger: MG3

MG enters the fray with the MG3, a vehicle designed to European standards that brings a fresh aesthetic to the segment. In Comfort specification, it undercuts its rivals on price while offering the most powerful engine on paper: a 1.5-litre unit delivering 81 kW and 142 Nm. It also boasts the longest warranty in this group at 7 years or 200 000 km.

The interior is a standout, featuring a modern dashboard with a nicely integrated touchscreen and high-quality graphics.

While the MG feels substantial and well-insulated on the move, its real-world performance and fuel consumption figures didn’t quite live up to the high expectations set by its technical specifications.

Practicality & Boot space

In the world of compact hatchbacks, every litre of luggage space counts. While all three vehicles feature ISOFIX child seat mounts and spare wheels, their boot layouts differ significantly. The Volkswagen Polo Vivo offers the most depth and overall volume, making it the practicality king for small families.

The MG3 follows closely behind, offering a decent amount of space for the weekly shop. The Suzuki Swift, while improved over its predecessor, remains the smallest in this regard. However, it is the only vehicle in this trio to offer 60/40 split-folding rear seats, providing an extra layer of versatility when you need to carry both passengers and longer items.

Verdict

Choosing the “best” budget hatchback depends heavily on your priorities. The Volkswagen Polo Vivo remains the safe, patriotic choice with excellent resale value and an extensive dealer network. The MG3 is the high-spec alternative for those who want the latest tech and the longest possible warranty at the lowest price.

Compare their specs: MG3 vs Suzuki Swift vs VW Polo Vivo

However, as an all-rounder, the Suzuki Swift continues to set a high bar. Its combination of standard features, refined ride quality, and incredible fuel economy makes it a difficult package to beat in a price-sensitive market. Each car has its strengths, and for the first time in years, the budget hatchback segment has a genuine three-way battle for supremacy.

Suzuki Jimny 3-Door (2026) Price & Specs

Scoop! The Suzuki Jimny 3-Door will soon receive several upgrades, including more safety equipment, optional ADAS kit and a larger touchscreen. Here’s what it will cost in SA…

  • Jimny 3-Door to upgrade to 6 airbags
  • Larger (9.0-inch) touchscreen coming
  • Optional ADAS package to be available

The Suzuki Jimny 3-Door is in line to receive a number of upgrades in South Africa, ranging from additional safety kit – including a full complement of 6 airbags – to a larger touchscreen and even optional advanced driver assistance system (ADAS) features. And Cars.co.za can confirm local pricing a little early.

As a reminder, the Jimny 3-Door line-up – which launched locally way back in November 2018 – currently comprises a pair of high-spec GLX derivatives, with the base GA and mid-tier GL variants no longer available. Interestingly, while the Jimny 5-Door (launched late in 2023 and offered in GL and GLX guise) is made in India, the Jimny 3-Door is instead imported from Japan.

The update for the Jimny 3-Door doesn’t include styling changes.

So, what changes have been made to the 3-door version of the Hamamatsu-based brand’s plucky little body-on-frame SUV? Well, while the Jimny 3-Door GLX – which remains available in 5-speed manual and 4-speed automatic guise – previously made do with dual front airbags, the updated version upgrades to 6 airbags (gaining front-side and curtain items).

In addition, Suzuki has ditched the old 7.0-inch infotainment system in favour of a 9.0-inch touchscreen (as used in the Jimny 5-Door GLX), complete with a reverse-view camera. Finally, the 3-door Jimny gains electrically foldable side mirrors. According to our information, the Jimny 3-Door 1.5 GLX AllGrip 5MT will be priced at R444 900, while the Jimny 3-Door 1.5 GLX AllGrip 4AT will come in at R466 900 (an increase of R8 000 in each case).

The Jimny 3-Door will upgrade to a 9.0-inch touchscreen (as used in the Jimny 5-Door GLX).

Interestingly, Suzuki Auto SA will also offer the Jimny 3-Door with what it terms “Dual Sensor Brake Support II” (DSBSII). Models such equipped will feature a monocular camera and laser sensor to detect vehicles, bicycles and pedestrians ahead (issuing audio and visual warnings or automatically applying the brakes, if necessary), unlocking various ADAS functions.

As such, the DSBSII-equipped derivatives will feature adaptive cruise control, lane-departure warning, lane-departure prevention, weaving alert and automatic high beams. These variants will also score front parking sensors (in addition to the seemingly now-standard rear items).

The Jimny 3-Door is in line to score optional new ADAS features.

Based on our understanding, the Jimny 3-Door 1.5 GLX AllGrip 5MT DSBSII will be priced at R459 900, while the Jimny 3-Door 1.5 GLX AllGrip 4AT DSBSII will cost you R481 900. In each instance, that effectively translates to a R15 000 premium over the standard derivatives.

As before, the Jimny 3-Door is powered by Suzuki’s ubiquitous naturally aspirated 1.5-litre, 4-cylinder petrol engine (K15B), which delivers an unchanged 75 kW and 130 Nm to all 4 wheels via either a 5-speed manual gearbox or a 4-speed torque-converter automatic transmission.

What will the updated Suzuki Jimny 3-Door cost in SA?

DERIVATIVEPRICE
Jimny 3-Door 1.5 GLX AllGrip 5MTR444 900
Jimny 3-Door 1.5 GLX AllGrip 5MT DSBSIIR459 900
Jimny 3-Door 1.5 GLX AllGrip 4ATR466 900
Jimny 3-Door 1.5 GLX AllGrip 4AT DSBSIIR481 900

The prices above include Suzuki’s 5-year/200 000 km warranty and a 4-year/60 000 km service plan.

Find a Suzuki Jimny on Cars.co.za!

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) About the Updated Suzuki Jimny 3-Door

Q: What are the key safety improvements in the updated Jimny 3-Door?

 

A: The most significant change is the move from 2 to 6 airbags as standard, now including front-side and curtain airbags. Additionally, Suzuki is introducing an optional “Dual Sensor Brake Support II” (DSBSII) package, which adds a monocular camera and laser sensor to enable advanced driver assistance features like autonomous emergency braking.

Q: What tech and convenience features have been added to the cabin?

 

A: The updated GLX model ditches the old 7.0-inch display for a larger 9.0-inch touchscreen infotainment system, the same unit found in the Jimny 5-Door GLX. Other convenient additions include electrically foldable side mirrors.

Q: How much extra will the new ADAS features cost compared to the standard GLX?

 

A: Choosing the DSBSII-equipped version adds a R15 000 premium to the price. This package includes adaptive cruise control, lane-departure warning, lane-departure prevention, weaving alert and automatic high beams, making it the most technologically advanced 3-door Jimny offered in South Africa to date.

Related content

Why Suzuki likely won’t build Jimny bakkie

So long, Ciaz! Budget sedan departs SA

Best-selling ladder-frame SUVs in 2025

JMC Vigus DC (2026) Price & Specs

The new JMC Vigus double-cab bakkie has arrived in South Africa, powered by a 2.5-litre turbodiesel engine and priced from just under R400 000…

  • New Vigus DC revealed for Mzansi
  • Ties for title of SA’s cheapest DC
  • 3 derivatives available from launch
  • 2.5 TD makes 123 kW and 430 Nm

Jiangling Motors Corporation – or “JMC” for short – officially returned to South Africa late in 2025 with the JMC Vigus workhorse bakkie and the Carrying Plus truck. But the automaker has already rolled out a new version of the Vigus double cab, launching a model that’s badged as the “Baodian” in its domestic market of China.

The new Vigus double-cab portfolio comprises a trio of derivatives at launch, each powered by a 2.5-litre, 4-cylinder turbodiesel engine generating 123 kW (at 3 400 rpm) and 430 Nm (from 1 600 to 2 200 rpm). These peak outputs are delivered via either a 6-speed manual gearbox or an 8-speed automatic transmission. The range-topper features a BorgWarner 4WD system with a low-range transfer case.

The Chinese brand – which is distributed locally by Salvador Caetano Auto SA (the company that’s also responsible for GAC Motor in Mzansi) – has confirmed the Vigus 2.5TD DC 4×2 6MT will be priced at R399 900, while the Vigus 2.5TD DC 4×2 8AT will come in at R459 900 and the flagship Vigus 2.5TD DC 4×4 8AT at R499 900.

That base price of R399 900 sees the new Vigus tie for the title of South Africa’s most affordable double-cab bakkie, sharing the tag with fellow Chinese contenders the Foton Tunland G7 2.0TD TL 4×2 6MT (R399 900) and the JAC T8 2.0CTI Lux 4×2 6MT (R399 900).

The new ladder-frame bakkie measures 5 335 mm long, which makes it around 15 mm shorter than a Ford Ranger double cab. Though official specification details for the local market are still thin on the ground, we do know you’ll find a 9.0-inch instrument cluster and a 12.8-inch touchscreen inside, along with a reverse-view camera (complemented by parking sensors).

Claimed payload and towing-capacity figures have yet to be confirmed for the local market. It’s likewise not yet clear whether the older Vigus double-cab derivatives launched late last year (each powered by a 104 kW/350 Nm 2.0-litre oil-burner and priced close to these new entrants) will soldier on or fall away.

What does the new JMC Vigus cost in South Africa?

DERIVATIVEPRICE
JMC Vigus 2.5TD DC 4×2 6MTR399 900
JMC Vigus 2.5TD DC 4×2 8ATR459 900
JMC Vigus 2.5TD DC 4×4 8ATR499 900

The prices above include a 5-year/200 000 km warranty and a 4-year/65 000 km service plan.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) About the New JMC Vigus Double Cab

Q: What engine and transmission options are available in the new JMC Vigus?

 

A: The new Vigus range is powered by a 2.5-litre, 4-cylinder turbodiesel engine that produces 123 kW and 430 Nm. Buyers can choose between a 6-speed manual transmission or an 8-speed automatic gearbox. The flagship 4×4 model also features a BorgWarner four-wheel-drive system with a low-range transfer case for off-road use.

Q: How does the size of the JMC Vigus compare to established bakkies like the Ford Ranger?

 

A: The Vigus is a full-sized contender in the double-cab segment. Measuring 5 335 mm in length, it is only about 15 mm shorter than a Ford Ranger. This translates to a substantial road presence and a cabin that comfortably accommodates five passengers, while still offering a practical load bed for work or leisure gear.

Q: What standard warranty and service support does JMC offer in South Africa?

 

A: To provide peace of mind for local buyers, JMC includes a comprehensive 5-year/200 000 km warranty as standard. Additionally, the purchase price includes a 4-year/65 000 km service plan, which is significant in the budget-bakkie segment where such plans are often sold as optional extras.

Related content

5 cheapest double-cab bakkies in SA (2026)

JMC Vigus SC and DC (2025) Price & Specs

Chinese brand JMC revived in South Africa

Toyota Corolla Cross GR-Sport (2026) Launch Review

The GR-Sport version of the popular Toyota Corolla Cross is the most successful Gazoo-badged model on sale in South Africa. The midlife update of this model has a lot to live up to, then…

We recently found ourselves at Zwartkops Raceway for the launch of the refreshed Toyota Corolla Cross GR-Sport. An ambitious locale for a midsize crossover’s launch, I thought, despite its illustrious Gazoo Racing badging. Except, our test route immediately pointed away from the circuit to the leafy ‘burbs of Pretoria. Fine, I guess it’s where the family SUV thrives, after all.

Where does the Toyota Corolla Cross GR-Sport fit in?

The Corolla Cross GR-Sport sits at the pinnacle of this hugely successful midsize crossover’s range.

This is, in fact, a midlife update. As mentioned up front, its predecessor was the most successful Gazoo-badged model in the Japanese marque’s portfolio here in Mzansi, so no pressure. Pricing remains compelling at R527 000 for the regular petrol-powered 1.8 GR-S, while R569 700 gets you the hybridised 1.8 GR-S HEV model.

Design & Packaging

Exterior tweaks include a bespoke GR-S grille and bumper treatment.

Both versions enjoy all the mod-cons and features you’d expect from models high up in the line-up, but benefit further from being the sportiest (in appearance) iterations.

The design changes include exterior tweaks, a dedicated GR-S grille, and new multi-spoke 18-inch machined alloy wheels.

18-inch alloys distinguish the GR-Sport.

Around the rear, you’ll encounter a stylish update on the LED lamps as well as the new black model name badge. This contrasts well against the body colours – Glacier White, Chromium Silver and Arizona Red – each with a black roof.

Hop aboard and you’ll encounter an interior that continues the race-inspired theme. Dark-silver accents and red stitching abounds, joined by sports pedals, red seat belts, a GR logo on the helm (and elsewhere) plus column-mounted shift paddles (ICE model exclusively).

A new 10.1-inch touchscreen display is standard throughout the Corolla Cross range.

All versions of the Corolla Cross receive a refreshed cabin design, and here the revisions include a 10.1-inch touchscreen media display and a 12.3-inch digital instrument cluster (on GR-S and XR derivatives). The cabin feels higher-end as a result, and tactile with a great usage of premium surfaces.

GR-S and XR versions gain a 12.3-inch digital instrument array.

It also serves as a great venue to drive. The driver’s pew is a grippy sports bucket finished in cowhide and adorned once again with a Gazoo Racing logo in the headrest.

Also present are park-distance sensors, dual-zone climate control, and a panoramic parking camera. There’s even a kick sensor to remotely open the tailgate.

Performance & Efficiency

While no firecracker, the hybrid version is smooth and efficient.

From that revised cockpit, you drop your palm onto a leathery gear shifter, stick it in D for drive and have access to 103 kW and 173 Nm in the regular ICE car, whereas the HEV produces 72 kW from its engine, bolstered by the electric motor’s contribution of 90 kW. Torque sits at 142 Nm.

These are hardly earth-shattering numbers, but overall acceleration is impressively linear, especially in the hybrid.

Despite its sportier positioning, the GR-S rides comfortably.

Bouncing between the derivatives revealed 2 comfortable-to-drive models that are easy to recommend not just for their proven practicality, but also because, in GR-S guise, this crossover is an attractive prospect. Literally… With its high-contrast colour scheme, large wheels and blistered bodywork, it’s a head-turner – one we don’t mind vouching for.

A full suite of safety features is standard, as is a 360-degree camera system.

As it’s the highest trim grade, GR-S also earns a 5-star NCAP rating due to the inclusion of Toyota’s suite of electronics dubbed Safety Sense 2.0 with features such as rear-cross-traffic alert, in addition to 7 airbags, including driver and passenger, driver knee, front side, and curtain.  

Ride, Handling & Comfort

Easy, fuss-free driving manners underscore why the Corolla Cross is so popular.

On the road, the updated Corolla Cross remains a pleasure to pilot, offering all the benefits of a compact crossover with a Toyota badge. It’s comfortable and unobtrusive, with a seamless CVT, a trio of driving modes that you soon ignore and easy usability on the move with lots of physical buttons still present.

Toyota Corolla Cross Prices & After-sales support

Hybrid variants gain an 8-year/160 000 km battery warranty.

All models boast a 6-service/90 000 km service plan, 3-year/100 000 km warranty and a 8-year/160 000 km warranty on the hybrid models‘ batteries.

Corolla Cross 1.8 XiR420 700
Corolla Cross 1.8 XSR458 400
Corolla Cross 1.8 XS HEVR501 100
Corolla Cross 1.8 XRR508 200
Corolla Cross 1.8 GR-SR527 000
Corolla Cross 1.8 XR HEVR552 400
Corolla Cross 1.8 GR-S HEVR569 700
Pricing correct as at March 2026.

Verdict

Right-sized and right-priced for our market, the updated Corolla Cross looks set to remain hugely popular.

Overall, Toyota has done well to deliver an even better-rounded package with the 2026 Corolla Cross, with the 1.8 GR-S and GR-S HEV models representing the tip of the spear.

Haval Jolion Pro vs MG ZS Pro vs Toyota Corolla Cross (2026): Ultimate SUV Comparison

The compact SUV/crossover segment in South Africa is arguably the most fiercely contested area of the new car market. To see how the status quo holds up against the latest challengers from Asia, we brought together a venerable fan favourite and 2 popular crossovers from China for the ultimate SUV comparison…

The dependable Toyota Corolla Cross has been a staple of the South African market for a good number of years now. However, nipping at its heels (and overtaking it in the sales charts last month) is the incredibly popular Haval Jolion Pro, while the new MG ZS Pro is hungry for its own slice of the compact crossover pie. Each of these vehicles offers a different take on the mid-sized SUV formula, but only one can be the best all-rounder in this ultimate SUV comparison.

Toyota Corolla Cross: The sensible stalwart

The Corolla Cross is a masterclass in “boringly brilliant” engineering. Built right here in South Africa at Toyota’s Prospecton plant, it was the 3rd best-selling passenger vehicle in the country in 2025.

It is the only vehicle in this group with a naturally aspirated 1.8-litre engine, which produces 103 kW and 172 Nm. While it lacks the turbocharged punch of its rivals, it counters with a reputation for bulletproof reliability and the strongest resale value in the business.

Inside, the Toyota feels the most traditional. It lacks the massive, high-resolution screens of the Chinese pair, but it makes up for it with tried-and-tested ergonomics.

Lastly, add a massive dealership footprint that provides unmatched peace of mind for long-distance travellers and the Corolla Cross is the choice for the head rather than the heart, offering a predictable ownership experience that few can match.

Haval Jolion Pro: The stylish high-tech contender

Haval has become a household name in record time, and the Jolion Pro is the reason why. It is packed to the rafters with features that would typically cost thousands more in European rivals. The Super Luxury trim tested here includes a panoramic sunroof, a fully digital cockpit, and a 1.5-litre turbocharged engine delivering 105 kW.

The Jolion Pro stands out with its bold design and premium-feeling cabin. It also boasts the longest wheelbase in this group, which translates into class-leading rear legroom – a vital metric for families with growing teenagers.

While its fuel consumption is the highest of the three, the sheer amount of “car for your money” makes it an incredibly tempting proposition.

MG ZS Pro: The surprising newcomer

MG is the newest player on the South African block, but the ZS Pro proves the brand isn’t here to simply make up the numbers. Unlike the ZS, the “Pro” version is a massive leap forward in quality, refinement, and performance. Its 1.5-litre turbo engine is the powerhouse of the group, churning out 125 kW and 275 Nm, which makes it noticeably more effortless when overtaking on the highway.

Perhaps the most surprising aspect of the MG is its ride quality. The suspension is exceptionally well-damped, soaking up road imperfections with a level of sophistication that matches more expensive vehicles.

With a 5-year/200 000 km warranty and a cabin built to European standards, it is a formidable alternative to the more established brands.

Practicality & the Family Test

When it comes to their boots, the numbers can be deceiving. While the Haval and Toyota both claim 440 litres of space, the MG ZS Pro features a clever false floor that makes it surprisingly adept at swallowing bulky items.

However, for those concerned about South African road conditions, the Toyota is the only one in this test to offer a full-size spare wheel, which is a significant “green flag” for many local buyers.

Compare their specs: MG ZS Pro vs Haval Jolion Pro vs Toyota Corolla Cross

We also put these SUVs through the ultimate stress test: fitting a child seat. While all three feature ISOFIX mounting points, the height of the vehicle and the ease of access through the rear doors become critical factors. Each car had its quirks, but the overall ease of use highlighted just how well suited this class of vehicle is to the modern family lifestyle.

Verdict

Choosing the best vehicle in this SUV comparison is no easy task. The Toyota Corolla Cross remains the safe, logical choice for those prioritising longevity and resale. The Haval Jolion Pro is the style and technology leader, offering a premium experience at a mainstream price. Meanwhile, the MG ZS Pro is the performance and comfort dark horse, delivering a drive that punches well above its weight.

Ultimately, the best choice depends on your specific family needs – be it the peace of mind of a massive dealer network, the allure of cutting-edge tech, or the refined punch of a modern turbocharged engine.

Mercedes‑Maybach van? Flagship VLS confirmed!

Mercedes-Benz has confirmed it plans to offer a Mercedes-Maybach van, basing this upcoming flagship “Grand Limousine” model on the as-yet-unrevealed VLS…

  • Flagship VLS to feature Maybach badge
  • Set to be first Maybach based on a van
  • Likely to feature all-electric powertrain

German brand Mercedes-Benz has officially confirmed it will affix the storied Mercedes-Maybach badge to a (seemingly not-so-humble) van for the very first time, revealing plans to roll out a flagship version of the upcoming VLS.

As a reminder, the Mercedes-Benz VLE is tipped to eventually replace the current-generation V-Class, with the yet-to-be-revealed VLS set to be positioned above it. However, the Stuttgart-based brand has now confirmed a Mercedes-Maybach VLS will serve as the very pinnacle of the range.

The Vision V concept of 2025 may well serve as a preview of the Maybach VLS.

Describing the upcoming luxury van as a “Grand Limousine defined by prestige and exceptional elegance”, Mercedes-Benz promised the Maybach-badged version would appeal to “customers with the highest expectations”. The company suggested the Maybach VLS would bring together “generous space, uncompromising elegance and an uncompromising commitment to the rear passenger”.

“The all-new Mercedes‑Maybach VLS delivers an exceptional sense of space with unrivalled exclusivity, welcoming passengers into a completely new world of comfort and digital sophistication,” the automaker said in a short statement. Currently, the Maybach range includes ultra-luxury versions of the fully electric EQS SUV, the S-Class sedan, the GLS SUV and the SL roadster.

Note the Vision V concept’s distinctive rear lighting arrangement.

“This extravagant Grand Limousine transforms the generous space into an extraordinary private lounge with everything that characterises a Mercedes‑Maybach: impeccable craftsmanship, luxurious materials and exquisite design details. It’s a true Maybach, now combined with the ultimate spatial and immersive digital experience, elevating automotive excellence even further,” Mercedes-Benz added.

Though the official announcement made no mention of powertrains, it’s all but certain the new Maybach-branded van will ride on Mercedes-Benz’s latest modular Van Electric Architecture (VAN.EA). It will also likely draw plenty of inspiration from the “Vision V” concept revealed by Mercedes-Benz Vans back in April 2025.

Mercedes-Benz Vision V concept
The Vision V concept’s extravagant rear quarters.

That concept vehicle – which effectively took the form of a 4-seater – featured a large, automatically opening door on the right-hand side as well as an illuminated, retractable running board. Meanwhile, a “switchable” glass wall separated the “private lounge” area from the cockpit. The seating area furthermore featured a retractable 65-inch cinema screen (with split-screen functions and 4K resolution).

According to British publication Autocar, the “standard” version of the new VLS is expected to go into production towards the end of 2026, with the flagship Mercedes-Maybach VLS set to follow in 2027. Look out for a full reveal in the coming months…

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) About the Mercedes-Maybach VLS

Q: Is this the first time Mercedes-Benz has put a Maybach badge on a van?

 

A: Yes, the upcoming VLS will mark the official debut of the Mercedes-Maybach nameplate in the MPV segment. While 3rd-party tuners have customised V-Class interiors for years, this is a factory-backed “Grand Limousine” designed to offer the same level of prestige as the Maybach S-Class and GLS SUV.

Q: What can we expect from the interior of the Maybach VLS?

 

A: Based on the “Vision V” concept, the Maybach VLS is expected to function as a mobile private lounge. Potential features include a switchable glass partition between the cockpit and rear quarters, a massive 65-inch retractable 4K cinema screen and an emphasis on “immersive digital sophistication” for rear passengers.

Q: Will the Mercedes-Maybach VLS be electric or petrol-powered?

 

A: While official engine specs haven’t been released, the VLS is set to ride on the new modular Van Electric Architecture (VAN.EA). This strongly indicates that the flagship Maybach version will be a fully electric vehicle, aligning with Mercedes-Benz’s strategy to electrify its top-tier luxury portfolio.

Related content

Mercedes-Benz EQV 300 (2025) Price & Specs

BMW vs Mercedes-Benz: global sales for 2025

New (bigger) Mercedes-Benz GLB revealed

Is the Chery diesel hybrid bakkie a good idea?

Nobody does diesel hybrids. But Chery is going to bring a turbodiesel hybrid bakkie to South Africa, soon. What do Chery engineers know, that everyone else, doesn’t?

Chery is now the dominant Chinese car company in South Africa. It might not be obvious from the numbers at first, but if you do the smart math, it’s true.

Take all the Chery sales, add in the Chery sub-brands (which operate independently) and it is the biggest Chinese car company (as an associated entity) operating in South Africa. It’s a huge achievement for a brand that started off with terrible reverse-engineered Daewoo Matiz clones nearly 20 years ago.

The one thing Chery doesn’t have is a bakkie. Product planners at Chery have clearly seen the strong demand for bakkies in the South African market. They would have observed the success of GWM’s P-Series range, too. That’s possibly part of the reason why Chery purchased the Nissan assembly plant at Rosslyn, which has operated as a specialist bakkie assembly plant during the last phase of its Japanese ownership.

There is no containing Chery’s ambition and it has confirmed that the Himla bakkie will be marketed locally this year. But the more interesting news is the diesel-hybrid KP31, which Chery has also confirmed for the local market later this year or early in 2027.

South Africans are buying more hybrid vehicles than ever before, and last year saw a huge increase in demand for PHEVs. But they are all petrol-electrics, not diesel. And that begs the question: why has nobody built true diesel-electric PHEVs? And does Chery know something we don’t with the KP31?

Everyone loves hybrids … with petrol engines

The Corolla Cross is one of SA’s most popular hybrids, with a simple, naturally-aspirated, petrol engine.

Hybrids are great to own but an engineering nightmare. Integrating both internal-combustion and electric powertrains into a single platform is complicated, costly and sacrificial in terms of packaging. You have some of the benefits of an ICE powertrain or electric drive, but also all of the disadvantages of each.

Since the first hybrids came to market in the late 1990s, engineers have preferred to make them naturally aspirated petrol-electrics. Why? Because naturally aspirated petrols are simpler, with lower long-term maintenance risk. But also because the linear power delivery of a naturally aspirated petrol engine complements the hybrid’s setup best.

Why do naturally aspirated petrol engines work so well with hybrids? Because there is so little power delivery overlap. What do we mean by that? The battery-electric part of a hybrid drives at pull-away and low speeds, where a naturally aspirated petrol engine is weakest and not very efficient. At the speed where the hybrid system’s electric motor becomes overburdened for its power output, the petrol engine is in its ideal power curve to take over.

Why diesels aren’t good hybrids

Back in 2008, SsangYong tried to develop diesel hybrid tech…

The reason nobody really makes any diesel hybrids is that their energy-delivery overlap is too great. Diesels are all about lots of torque at low speeds, and that means they’d make the electric-motor bit of a hybrid setup nearly redundant.

In a hybrid, you want the 2 elements of the powertrain to be complementary, not operating simultaneously. The other issue is that diesels have heavier engine internals and are less tolerant of the inconsistent duty cycle that is inherent to a hybrid. All that on/off operation isn’t great for diesel engine efficiency.

Experienced diesel bakkie and SUV owners know that these engines run best when they are at a very constant throttle and speed. An issue with diesels in hybrid systems is the durability risk. Modern diesels have many emissions-control components, which can become problematic. The diesel particulate filters and exhaust gas recirculation systems need high temperatures to function properly and to burn off carbon and other particulates.

When diesel engines run start/stop, they are at risk of more carbon and particulate matter buildup, with very expensive maintenance and repair costs. Why? Because of the interrupted duty cycle of being part of a hybrid system, the diesel engine doesn’t run consistently hot enough for all its emissions systems to function.

Petrol engines are just inherently less risky in the hybrid duty cycle. And cheaper to maintain, in the long term, as part of a hybrid system. Petrol engines also have much less vibration, especially at start-up, low speeds, and during acceleration than diesel engines.

The Chery diesel hybrid

Chery KP31 diesel PHEV concept
Chery’s PHEV turbodiesel. Is this the Chinese hybrid that changes everything in the bakkie market?

If diesel hybrids aren’t a great idea, and nobody really makes them, why is Chery choosing to be an outlier? Because being first to market with a diesel PHEV will give it huge brand standing in the bakkie market. And it promises a huge range – in excess of 1 000 km – with ease of refuelling in rural areas, where diesel is always available but petrol is not.

There’s no question that Chinese engineers know more about hybrids than their rivals in traditional vehicle development hubs like Europe. But the Chinese have not been diesel-engine pioneers at all. And that’s where the powertrain of Chery’s KP31 raises questions.

Sourcing the best automotive-grade battery is a given because Chery will use a Chinese-made battery pack for the KP31, so the electric portion of the hybrid powertrain will be excellent.

But what about that 2.5-litre turbodiesel Chery’s developed? Theoretically, the ideal engine for a South African-market bakkie is still a pure turbodiesel, not a hybrid. The Toyota Hilux is the measure of everything in the South African bakkie market, and yes, technically it does offer a “hybrid” option. But those Hilux 2.8-litre turbodiesel “hybrids” are compliance hybrids, with a 48 V integrated starter motor that does very little to drive the bakkie.

Buy a new or used Chery on Cars.co.za

Is there a market for diesel hybrid bakkies?

The form factor of an electric drive unit under the front or rear axle can become a ground clearance issue…

Chinese brands, especially those in the Chery brand stable, have dominated the surge in demand for PHEVs in the local crossover-SUV market. But South African bakkie buyers seem disinterested in transitioning from diesel to hybrid bakkie powertrains.

GWM’s big hybrid bakkies and the BYD Shark are halo models, but both have been criticised for their limited range and true all-terrain ability in South African conditions.

Demand for these petrol-hybrid bakkies from GWM and BYD has been low, while demand for traditional turbodiesel brands’ double-cabs, priced in the same segment as the P500 and Shark, remains very strong. The fact that Hilux and Ranger turbodiesel sales have not been impacted by the P500 and Shark is evidence of how traditional South African bakkie buyers still are, even at the R1-million price point in the lifestyle bakkie market.

We don’t yet know the output numbers of Chery’s KP31 engine but there is an official thermodynamic claim of 47% efficiency. How good is that? Well, an AMG One has a thermal efficiency rating of only 40%. Perhaps even more importantly for the KP31 is the 30% reduction in noise and vibration compared to other diesel engines in the market.

Can Chery solve diesel hybrid issues?

Those 6-stud wheels suggest the KP31 will be a lot more off-road capable than P500 or BYD’s Shark.

The main issues with a diesel hybrid – the fact that all the best diesel benefits overlap with those of the electric motor, thereby reducing the overall benefit of the system – seem difficult to solve. What could Chery’s engineering innovation breakthrough be to make hybrid power and diesel engines work?

Could Chery’s engineers somehow keep the engine at an operating temperature that is ideal for diesel engine health, especially the emissions treatment systems, while it’s coasting and syncing with the battery pack and electric motor? That kind of duty-cycle frequency management appears complicated and costly. Still, Chinese engineers have done amazing things in the hybrid and EV powertrain space over the last decade, so there’s every possibility that they will surprise the market with the KP31’s powertrain integration.

On some of its pure ICE vehicles, Chery’s low-speed throttle calibration lacks refinement. But on the hybrids, Chery’s engineers are masters of integration and software control. However, with most turbodiesels operating best between 1 500 and 2 800 rpm, it’s difficult to imagine what the KP31’s diesel engine will be doing at low speed in city traffic. Or, even more problematically, when driving on challenging, steep terrain off-road.

If Chery has solved the pairing and integration issue of a turbodiesel hybrid, it could be the biggest thing in bakkie powertrains since common-rail diesel injection.

Buy a new or used Chery on Cars.co.za

245 kW Audi S3 vs 440 kW Omoda C9 (2026) Drag Race

The world of performance motoring is in a state of flux, where established German icons are being challenged by high-tech, high-output contenders from the East. To see how these two worlds collide on a quarter-mile strip, we brought together the recently facelifted Audi S3 and the formidable Omoda C9 PHEV for a comparison that, on paper at least, seems entirely mismatched...

It’s the unlikely battle of the S3 vs the C9… The Audi S3 has long been the gold standard for accessible, everyday performance. In its latest guise, the turbocharged 2.0-litre engine has received a power bump to 245 kW and 420 Nm.

Opposing it is the Omoda C9, a Chinese plug-in hybrid (PHEV) that claims a staggering 440 kW and 950 Nm from its combination of three electric motors and a petrol engine.

Read more: Audi S3 Facelift (2026) Review & Omoda C9 PHEV (2025) Review

S3 vs C9: The power debate on paper vs pavement

There is often a significant discrepancy between manufacturer-claimed figures and real-world performance, particularly with hybrid systems. While Omoda’s numbers suggest the C9 should comfortably outpace almost anything on the road, these figures are often a cumulative total of all power sources which don’t always peak at the same time.

Furthermore, weight plays a massive role in drag racing. The Audi S3 is a relatively lean machine at approximately 1.5 tonnes, whereas the battery-laden Omoda C9 tips the scales at around 1.9 tonnes. Despite this weight penalty, both vehicles claim a 0-100 kph sprint time in the region of 4.9 seconds, setting the stage for a remarkably close encounter.

Standing starts & launch control

The Audi S3 benefits from a tried-and-tested launch control system that is remarkably easy to engage, allowing for consistent, hard launches off the line.

In contrast, the Omoda C9 proved more temperamental to get off the mark effectively. In a standing start, the initial reaction time and the car’s ability to put its power down instantly are critical.

During our testing, the results were closer than many might have anticipated. The S3’s agility and superior aerodynamics at higher speeds allowed it to stay relevant, while the C9’s massive torque from its electric motors provided a “bullet-like” surge once it found traction. The battle quickly turned into a game of inches, with the winner often decided by who managed the cleaner getaway…

Curious to find out which vehicle won? Watch the full video to see the final results of this high-speed showdown.

Audi S3 Facelift (2026) Review

The Audi S3 facelift recently arrived in local showrooms. Armed with 245 kW, it promises a performance punch in a premium glove, but this comes at a price! Worth it? Let’s take a closer look.

We like: Great balance of performance, practicality and premiumness, fit and finish.

We don’t like: Price of extras, understated design, quiet exhaust.

FAST FACTS

  • Model: 2026 Audi S3 Sportback TFSI quattro
  • Price: R1 091 100
  • Engine: 2.0-litre 4-cylinder turbocharged petrol
  • Transmission: 7-speed dual-clutch transmission
  • Power / Torque: 245 kW/420 Nm
  • Claimed fuel consumption: 7.9 L/100 km
  • Claimed 0-100 kph: 4.7 seconds

Where does the Audi S3 facelift fit in?

Daytona Grey Audi S3.

This is not Audi’s first attempt at blending premium with performance, and the recipe is straightforward. Take a standard A3, shove in a performance engine, upgrade the suspension and add on some sporty visuals … and you’re pretty much good to go for the S3 recipe.

For this iteration, Audi has increased the power, enhanced the handling with the clever torque splitter lifted straight from the RS3, upgraded the suspension and given it a sharper look to separate it from the lesser A3 derivatives in the range. It’s available in two body styles: Sportback and Sedan.

Sadly, the badge on the nose has been deleted, leaving just this.

In terms of rivals, what else is out there if you have around R1 million to spend on something fun? The Audi S3 facelift’s natural competitors are the BMW M135 xDrive and Mercedes-AMG A35 4Matic. We’d be chastised if we didn’t mention the S3’s less premium twin, the Volkswagen Golf R, but if you’re wanting something which sacrifices “premiumness” for raw performance, take a look at the Honda Civic Type R and the Toyota GR Corolla.

At the time of writing (March 2026), AMG’s A35 had been withdrawn from the new-car specifications database and we’re still awaiting the local debut of the latest iteration of Volkswagen Golf 8.5 R.

See how they compare: Audi S3 vs BMW M135 vs Toyota GR Corolla

How the Audi S3 facelift fares in terms of…

Design & Packaging

In the right light, the Audi S3 looks sporty and premium.

The Audi S3 facelift looks particularly understated, especially in this Daytona Grey Pearl finish. Interestingly, Audi says this is one of its most popular colours. Shows how little we know! That said, it’s going to take a keen eye to separate this S3 from a standard A3, especially as the subtle S3 badge on the front grille is no more. It ticks the petrolhead boxes, though: wing, quad exhausts, big wheels and big brakes. Disclaimer, the carbon-fibre wing is an optional extra, and we’ll be saying those two words quite often in this article.

Optional red stitching adds some sportiness to the cabin.

Climb inside, and the facelift treatment introduces a minimalist gear selector, upgraded infotainment system and some neat touches like new materials and the introduction of ambient lighting. We would have liked some sense of occasion, something other than the flat-bottomed steering and sporty seats to remind us that we’re in a near-halo model.

This gloss black plastic is challenge to keep clean, but the neat gear selector is impressive.

It all feels very nice to look at and stroke, with the common touch points all screaming premium. Well, almost everything, as the gloss black plastic around the gear selector is a fingerprint and dirt magnet. The digital instrument cluster has been revised and now has an interesting-looking rev counter and plenty of performance-related stats.

One of the more interestingly styled instrument clusters.

We’re happy to report that Audi has not fallen into the trap of integrating all functionality within the touchscreen and there are still plenty of high-quality buttons, both on the dashboard and on the steering wheel. Connectivity is taken care of by a pair of USB-C charging ports and Apple CarPlay/Android Auto add a further layer of tech.

Wireless Android Auto and Apple CarPlay adds an additional layer of tech.

Our test unit came loaded with a number of optional extras. The list was comprehensive and, due to space constraints, we’re not going to itemise everything. The interesting stuff was the Akrapovič performance exhaust system (R80 000), Daytona paint (R14 700), Black styling package (R13 300), carbon style package for the wing mirrors and rear roof spoiler (R31 200), uprated infotainment package pro (R33 800), interior red stitching (R8 100) and so on.

The total amount came to R271 200, taking the grand total from R1 091 100 to R1 362 300. We do think its a bit cheeky of Audi to charge for adaptive dampers and drive modes for one of its sportiest models…

Gimmick or gadget? We can’t decide…

Given its base as a premium hatchback, it is still expected to perform as transportation that can seat 4 people. While the front 2 seats offer space and outward visibility, the rear cabin starts to feel a touch on the cramped side for adults. If you have little ones, they’ll be fine. Adults? Don’t subject your mates for anything other than short drives.

Rear legroom is tight for adults, despite the sport seats having indents for your knees.

Ride, Handling & Comfort

The Audi S3 has always been able to handle both of its roles well. On one hand, it’s premium transport to get from A to B. On the other, it must entertain and excite as a performance vehicle. New for this model are revised settings for the power steering, upgraded suspension, enhanced 7-speed S tronic gearbox, and of course, the torque splitter system straight from the Audi RS3.

Audi S3 brakes offer commendable stopping power.

In its default Comfort setting, there’s very little to show that you’re in a performance vehicle. Slightly lethargic throttle response, slurred gearshifts and a generally relaxed demeanour. Once you start playing with the sportier modes and changing those gears yourself, however, the car starts to feel significantly more alive and befitting of that S3 badge.

Customise those settings to your heart’s delight.

Once you’ve ventured out of the comfort zone and found some traffic-free corners, the S3 showcases its high levels of grip and balance. We pushed and tried to coax it into some shenanigans, but the feeling of stability was impressive. With the adaptive dampers set to their sportiest mode, there was less body roll and we enjoyed how agile it was.

The steering setup is worth a mention, as the responsiveness is near instant. It feels like you’re encouraged to enter a corner at higher than normal speeds. Remember, you do have high levels of grip and stability as a safety net, but as you power out, the torque splitter comes into play to try to dial out that Audi habit of understeer. We don’t think many S3 customers will try push as hard as we did, but it’s reassuring to know that it’s capable!

The gearshift paddles are pleasant to use when in Dynamic mode.

Performance & Efficiency

The 2.0-litre EA888 Evo 4 engine is on duty and has outputs of 245 kW and 420 Nm. As is the case with every sporty Audi product, quattro all-wheel drive is also present. In comparison to its predecessor, which mustered 213 kW and 400 Nm, this is quite the jump. Interestingly, the model before that had 228 kW, but by now you know the drill about hot climate, fuel quality and so on…

The most powerful S3 to date.

With such muscular outputs, we eagerly dashed off to our local test strip, dialed up probably one of the easiest launch control programs and set off. Usually, Audi SA’s sportier vehicles run very close to claimed times and we’re prepared to accept being a 10th slower as still within expectations. However, despite our best attempts, this particular S3 would run no quicker than 4.96 seconds to 100 kph, some way off its 4.7 claim.

4.96 seconds to 100 kph is some way off the 4.7-second claim…

A quick call to some industry colleagues who had also evaluated this particular unit confirmed that they too encountered times way off the predicted pace. Perhaps a bad batch of fuel had forced the car’s ECU to reduce performance to protect the powertrain? All we know is, we were left feeling a tad disappointed and we hope that customer cars perform as close to advertised as possible.

R80k Akrapovič exhaust system is not worth it.

Another grumble we had was with the optional Akrapovič performance exhaust system. For R80 000, you’d expect some theatrics like a crackle or some pops on the overrun, but this system is eerily subtle. We can appreciate that, due to emissions laws and noise courtesy, exhausts are becoming quieter and quieter, but if a customer is paying for an overt soundtrack, they should be getting it in abundance. To add further embarrassment, we suspect there’s some artificial engine noise coming through the speakers.

Dynamic Plus is the S3 at its most extreme.

New for this model is an interesting setting called Dynamic Plus, on top of your usual drive select medley of Comfort, Auto, Efficiency and so on. It lives up to its name and makes everything like the throttle mapping and gearshifts extreme. Be mindful as it also summons the rear torque splitter into its most deranged rear-biased mode. Yes, you can get properly sideways in a quattro Audi S3. Factor in the cost of replacement tyres if you like this sort of thing.

Price & Aftersales support

The facelifted Audi S3 is sold with a 5-year/100 000 km Audi Freeway (maintenance) Plan as well as a 1-year/unlimited km warranty.

Audi S3 Sportback TFSI quattroR1 091 100
Audi S3 Sedan TFSI quattroR1 106 100

Verdict

Mind those options as the price can easily spiral.

With these headlining power outputs and the RS3’s handling hardware bolted in, this is pretty much the most performance-biased version of the Audi S3 on sale right now. Previous models were quick in a straight line, sure, but lacked that hands-on involvement when it came to the corners.

This facelift addresses those criticisms and delivers a surprisingly happy and engaging experience from a product known for its conservative demeanour. Should you buy one? Given the price of the options, it’s effortless to suddenly add almost R300k on to the list price, so we implore you to spec carefully. Not everything on the configurator is worth it, and given its subdued tone, that R80k for the Akaprovič is better spent elsewhere.

Want to purchase a new or used Audi? Browse vehicles for sale

All the latest Audi news and reviews

Frequently Asked Questions

How much does the Audi S3 cost in South Africa?

As of March 2026, the updated Audi S3 (facelift) is priced from R1 091 100 for the Sportback and R1 106 100 for the Sedan. These prices include VAT and the standard Audi Freeway Plan.

What are the engine performance specs for the new Audi S3?

The Audi S3 is powered by a 2.0-litre turbocharged petrol engine (TFSI) that has been uprated to produce **245 kW** and **420 Nm** of torque. This allows both the Sportback and Sedan to accelerate from 0 to 100 kph in just **4.7 seconds**, with a top speed electronically limited to 250 kph.

What is the Audi S3 torque splitter?

Borrowed from the high-performance RS 3, the torque splitter is a new addition to the S3. It uses two electronically controlled multi-disc clutches to actively distribute torque between the rear wheels. This significantly reduces understeer and improves agility, especially when using the new **Dynamic Plus** driving mode.

What is the fuel consumption of the Audi S3?

Audi claims a combined fuel consumption figure of approximately **7.8 L/100 km**. In real-world South African driving conditions, owners can expect figures closer to **9.5 – 10.5 L/100 km** depending on driving style.

What warranty and maintenance plan is included?

The Audi S3 comes standard with a **1-year/unlimited km warranty** and the **5-year/100 000 km Audi Freeway Plan**, which covers all scheduled services and maintenance. This plan can be extended at a cost for up to 15 years or 300 000 km.